Nakamichi Casette Decks
Nakamichi Casette Decks
I found a store with two Nakamichi decks locally. They have a 700 for $150, and a 1000 II for $400. I believe both are in good working condition-cosmetically they are great. I've heard Nakamichi's are really nice machines. Are these reasonable prices?
- analogcabin
- buyin' gear
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 10:38 am
- Location: Afton, Virginia
- Contact:
Not to sound sarcastic but.... It's a cassette deck. Granted, in 1988 a Nak was the one to own due to S/N ratio and low wow & flutter. But nowadays we have CD burners built into our computers and so forth.
Unless of course you're trying to pull stuff off of your old cassettes and transfer them into our 21st century, in which case the one for $150 ought to do quite nicely.
Unless of course you're trying to pull stuff off of your old cassettes and transfer them into our 21st century, in which case the one for $150 ought to do quite nicely.
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 10890
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
- Location: Charlotte, NC
- Contact:
The Nakamichis aren't the most robust things in the world (mine's in the shop again right now), but they sound freaking awesome. I've had mine for like 12 years and I've always loved the way it sounded. It has some really great features as well.
If you're willing to spend that kind of money on a cassette deck, then I'd say they're worth it. I don't know the difference in those two particular ones.
Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC
If you're willing to spend that kind of money on a cassette deck, then I'd say they're worth it. I don't know the difference in those two particular ones.
Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC
- carlsaff
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 11:55 am
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
I love my Nakamichi deck. Has come in very handy for some delicate transfer work.
Carl Saff Mastering
http://www.saffmastering.com
http://www.saffmastering.com
- I'm Painting Again
- zen recordist
- Posts: 7086
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:15 am
- Location: New York, New York
- Contact:
or unless you like the sound of a nice sounding cassette recorder..and need to archive your recordings for the long haul..e.maynard wrote:Not to sound sarcastic but.... It's a cassette deck. Granted, in 1988 a Nak was the one to own due to S/N ratio and low wow & flutter. But nowadays we have CD burners built into our computers and so forth.
Unless of course you're trying to pull stuff off of your old cassettes and transfer them into our 21st century, in which case the one for $150 ought to do quite nicely.
- TapeOpAndy
- TapeOp Family
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 1:59 am
- Location: Cambridge, MA; New York, NY
- Contact:
Way overpriced in my opinion.
I've owned 8 Nakamichi cassette decks since about 1983. Most of them have died and weren't worth fixing--mostly due to failed idler wheels. (Fixing a cassette deck costs more than buying a replacement!)
I have three working Naks in my collection now: an LX-5, a DR-2, and a CR-3. All were purchased for less than $100 on eBay. The latter two are in truly mint condition and came with original packaging and materials.
BTW, have you visited www.naks.com?
And who was it at the first TapeOpCon that said cassettes are like roaches? They'll be around forever, and they'll survive a nuclear blast.
I've owned 8 Nakamichi cassette decks since about 1983. Most of them have died and weren't worth fixing--mostly due to failed idler wheels. (Fixing a cassette deck costs more than buying a replacement!)
I have three working Naks in my collection now: an LX-5, a DR-2, and a CR-3. All were purchased for less than $100 on eBay. The latter two are in truly mint condition and came with original packaging and materials.
BTW, have you visited www.naks.com?
And who was it at the first TapeOpCon that said cassettes are like roaches? They'll be around forever, and they'll survive a nuclear blast.
- scott anthony
- suffering 'studio suck'
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 1:00 pm
- Location: jersey
- Contact:
The Nak MR-2 I had sounded awesome with tapes made in other decks, and sounded awesome with tapes made with it. Where it fell apart was in making tapes and playing them in other decks; always really disappointing.
I sold it and got one of these after hearing it at another studio...
http://cgi.ebay.com/Sony-3-Head-Hi-Fi-S ... dZViewItem
Nice 3 head deck...
I sold it and got one of these after hearing it at another studio...
http://cgi.ebay.com/Sony-3-Head-Hi-Fi-S ... dZViewItem
Nice 3 head deck...
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
That was always the thing with Nak decks, something about the heads meant that tapes made on them would never translate to other decks.scott anthony wrote:The Nak MR-2 I had sounded awesome with tapes made in other decks, and sounded awesome with tapes made with it. Where it fell apart was in making tapes and playing them in other decks; always really disappointing.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 76 guests