totally.kayagum wrote:The only time this ever worked for me was Minor Threat's classic cover version of Stepping Stone.
The Obligatory Fake-Out Lo-Fi Intro, is it Cliche Yet?
Bingo. I think this sums it up. And as a technique it is cliche and it sucks in the first place.theBaldfather wrote: Dynamic mixing seems to be more important than ever now that the mixes are getting crushed at the final stage. It probably is getting cliched, but there are a limited number of ways to make the current forms of music sound dynamic while being super squashed.
"If you will starve unless you become a rock star, then you have bigger problems than whether or not you are a rock star. " - Steve Albini
- wrenhunter
- pushin' record
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 2:54 pm
- Location: Boston, MA
maybe we should make a list and see how many major label releases have used the technique.
I seem to remember the first track of "Blood Sugar Sex Magik" did that. Of course it was probably still relatively fresh then.
On the Joni Mitchell record "Blue" there's one track where that happens in the middle, and I don't remember which one. It's sort of word-painting something in the lyrics about a jukebox or stereo or telephone or something, if I remember right. That certainly had a reason for existing so it gets a pass for sure.
I seem to remember the first track of "Blood Sugar Sex Magik" did that. Of course it was probably still relatively fresh then.
On the Joni Mitchell record "Blue" there's one track where that happens in the middle, and I don't remember which one. It's sort of word-painting something in the lyrics about a jukebox or stereo or telephone or something, if I remember right. That certainly had a reason for existing so it gets a pass for sure.
- logancircle
- tinnitus
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2003 8:45 am
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
I don't think it's as much a surprise techniques as it is a fade-in, like the establishing shot in a movie which often has an affected feel to it, that changes once the actualy movie begins. You wouldn't want it to happen more than maybe once in a movie/record, then it would get annoying, but I don't think it's annoyingly cliched.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Studio and Field Recorder in NYC.
I like dirt.
IG: stormydanielson
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Studio and Field Recorder in NYC.
I like dirt.
IG: stormydanielson
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Re: The Obligatory Fake-Out Lo-Fi Intro, is it Cliche Yet?
Does it count if it starts lo-fi and then, well, gets slightly higher?
I'm thinking of a cool track on the Liars first album "They threw us all in a Trench and stuck a monument on top" (circa 2001).
The track ("The Garden was crowded and Outside") starts with lo-fi typewriter clacking away.
This lil' rhythmic ditty is soon accompanied by a Bonham-esque simple drum beat, which was recorded on a little monophonic cassette recorder.
After ~ 30s, this yields to a full version of the song. Cliche I guess, but I still think it sounds pretty cool. 'specially if your good and buzzed.
I'm thinking of a cool track on the Liars first album "They threw us all in a Trench and stuck a monument on top" (circa 2001).
The track ("The Garden was crowded and Outside") starts with lo-fi typewriter clacking away.
This lil' rhythmic ditty is soon accompanied by a Bonham-esque simple drum beat, which was recorded on a little monophonic cassette recorder.
After ~ 30s, this yields to a full version of the song. Cliche I guess, but I still think it sounds pretty cool. 'specially if your good and buzzed.
"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."
- apropos of nothing
- dead but not forgotten
- Posts: 2193
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 6:29 am
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
- Contact:
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Re: The Obligatory Fake-Out Lo-Fi Intro, is it Cliche Yet?
Sure, the lo-fi intro sctick is a bit of an overused trick, but not quite as overused as a 16th-note hi-hat disco beat section in the middle of an indie rock song. I don't think it's gotten to that point of being totally nauseating and contrived yet.
Grandiose changes in mood, feel, tempo or sonic landscape will always be with us.
Grandiose changes in mood, feel, tempo or sonic landscape will always be with us.
I think this is one of the primary reasons we hear this. There is no big without small. Lo-fi intros can definitely make ok mixes sound better by comparison... at least for the next 16 bars or so.A-Barr wrote: Is it an attempt to lower the listener's expectations to make the regular mix sound better by comparison?
- LVC_Jeff
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:29 pm
- Location: Lebanon Valley College, Annville, PA
- Contact:
It's about as cliche'd as a reversed cymbal crash and then a short pause before the first chord of a metalcore song
But I enjoy them both. Cliches can sound good. Depends on the record and the band.
But I enjoy them both. Cliches can sound good. Depends on the record and the band.
Jeff- Music Recording Technology Student at LVC
Skinny Shamrock Recording- http://www.myspace.com/skinnyshamrockrecording
Skinny Shamrock Recording- http://www.myspace.com/skinnyshamrockrecording
I hadn't thought about it being an official cliche yet but I've tried to stop thinking about music in those terms because especially with pop/rock music it's all cliche and it's all been done a zillion times. It's a formula. Just like someone else pointed out the whole I IV V chord progression. I've done the lo-fi vocal/guitar intro technique three or four times recently and it didn't make me cringe so at least in those cases it helped more than it hurt but it was their choice so I just did what I was told. Usually by the time we're at the mixing stage I can give an honest opinion and if I think it sucks then I'll speak up but ultimately I'll do whatever I'm told to do.
Thanks for mentioning Barkmarket I'd forgotten how good they were. Used to see them out in Philly, always loved the name.
And hellyea it works on Stepping Stone.....I just finished a book about the history of American Hardcore music. Great great stuff.....
Thanks for mentioning Barkmarket I'd forgotten how good they were. Used to see them out in Philly, always loved the name.
And hellyea it works on Stepping Stone.....I just finished a book about the history of American Hardcore music. Great great stuff.....
Of course I've had it in the ear before.....
*steals this idea*inverseroom wrote:I intend to have ten seconds of glorious full spectrum ROCK at the beginning of my next record, followed by 45 minutes of transistor radio static.
*fails to make anything entertaining out of it*
?What need is there to weep over parts of life? The whole of it calls for tears.? -- Seneca
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 195 guests