recording upright bass
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:55 pm
recording upright bass
I own a nice LDC and a nice SDC (and have a decent ribbon on the way). Can anyone help w/ mic placement ideas - and or any compression or eq tips that have worked for you?
That's perfect, now I need you to change it all!
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:58 pm
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Re: recording upright bass
On messageboards, you'll always hear "There are no special tricks. Just listen, learn and trust your instincts."Edisonsarm wrote:I own a nice LDC and a nice SDC (and have a decent ribbon on the way). Can anyone help w/ mic placement ideas - and or any compression or eq tips that have worked for you?
This is true, 98.9% of the time.
However, upright bass is one of the few cases where there actually is a secret trick. All you need is an an, LDC, an SDC and a couple of rubber bands.
Well, it's not super-duper-secret.... but if you think about it, it's odd enough that it would take a rare person to discover it on their own. I know I wouldn't have. So I guess it's only kinda-secret.
Nowadays, I can't imagine recording upright bass any other way. (unless I was going for a particularly oddball or novel sound). Yes, it's that good. (provided the player and instrument sound good, as with anything else). Don't worry... someone will spill the beans. I just can't bring myself to do it, for fear that no-one will ever entrust me with super-secret recording methods ever again.
Some people use foam. I think that's silly. It has the potential to compromise the instrument's resonance. Rubberbands are much better, if you ask me.
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:55 pm
I'm both intrigued and disappointed in your post fossiltooth. C'mon let's hear the rubber band trick!!!
Also for the record - I've always thought the whole "no special tricks, listen, trust your instincts" is lame - sure that's a given - inexperienced people are just looking for advice and a place to start from.
Also for the record - I've always thought the whole "no special tricks, listen, trust your instincts" is lame - sure that's a given - inexperienced people are just looking for advice and a place to start from.
That's perfect, now I need you to change it all!
-
- pushin' record
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:44 pm
- Location: in my own little world
I guessing that he meant to say "suspend the SDC from the bridge with the rubber bands pointing up towards the fingers."
The foam refers to stuffing the mic behind the tailpiece with foam, which would be the other way of doing it. Rubber bands are definitely a better idea.
As an alternative, I've gotten good results with an omni SDC equidistant from the f-hole and strings, but on-axis to the strings (where the fingers are). However, if there is a jazz trio (or more) involved and they start playing some up-tempo stuff, you can forget about isolation - you'll get more drums than bass in your bass mic.
You'd probably be better off using fossiltooth's idea and taking a DI as a safety
btw - there's nothing secret about it - I think Steve from Aurasonics once posted pictures of this in his forum on Gearslutz.
The foam refers to stuffing the mic behind the tailpiece with foam, which would be the other way of doing it. Rubber bands are definitely a better idea.
As an alternative, I've gotten good results with an omni SDC equidistant from the f-hole and strings, but on-axis to the strings (where the fingers are). However, if there is a jazz trio (or more) involved and they start playing some up-tempo stuff, you can forget about isolation - you'll get more drums than bass in your bass mic.
You'd probably be better off using fossiltooth's idea and taking a DI as a safety
btw - there's nothing secret about it - I think Steve from Aurasonics once posted pictures of this in his forum on Gearslutz.
"We have met the enemy and he is us"
- Pogo Possum
- Pogo Possum
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Mission accomplished.Edisonsarm wrote:I'm both intrigued and disappointed in your post fossiltooth. C'mon let's hear the rubber band trick!!!
If you keep at this gig, you will eventually find yourself making this 'lame' point again and again. Sometimes, "there is no answer" is the only answer. You just won't get it 'til ya get it. Stay at it long enough and you'll start turning green, shrink 36" and start talking backwards.Edisonsarm wrote:Also for the record - I've always thought the whole "no special tricks, listen, trust your instincts" is lame - sure that's a given - inexperienced people are just looking for advice and a place to start from.
We all go through exactly what you're going through right now. We all want answers... now. Then we find out the key is asking the right questions and trying to answer them yourself.
.........................no comment.locosoundman wrote:I guessing that he meant to say "suspend the SDC from the bridge with the rubber bands pointing up towards the fingers." .
Thank you.locosoundman wrote:The foam refers to stuffing the mic behind the tailpiece with foam, which would be the other way of doing it. Rubber bands are definitely a better idea.
...oops.. I mean 'no comment'.
Well, if you ask me, the LDC is essential. The SDC by itself won't do the trick. It really has to be blended with an LDC pointed at the..... oh, you'll figure it out.locosoundman wrote:You'd probably be better off using fossiltooth's idea and taking a DI as a safety
For my tastes, I'd consider a DI to be anal extra protection, and a potential waste of channels. But under (un)certain circumstances, having one ready to roll could save the day.
...Oh crap, I meant to say: "I have no idea what you're talking about."
I thought it was pretty clear that I was just being cheeky.locosoundman wrote:btw - there's nothing secret about it - I think Steve from Aurasonics once posted pictures of this in his forum on Gearslutz.
Last edited by fossiltooth on Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:52 pm, edited 3 times in total.
414 on the bridge in cardioid pointed towards the strings.
There's no other way to do it. The definition of a DI with the fullness of an amp, and you don't have to deal with the bullshit that occurs if their pickup is fucked up on the upright. Which, for me, has always buzzed, or stopped working in the middle of a session.
For me, it's an octava MK219 or some cheapass audio technica because, I cannot afford a 414. Maybe if I get more sessions. But the one time I did get to try the 414 this way, it kicked ass.
There's no other way to do it. The definition of a DI with the fullness of an amp, and you don't have to deal with the bullshit that occurs if their pickup is fucked up on the upright. Which, for me, has always buzzed, or stopped working in the middle of a session.
For me, it's an octava MK219 or some cheapass audio technica because, I cannot afford a 414. Maybe if I get more sessions. But the one time I did get to try the 414 this way, it kicked ass.
Real friends stab you in the front.
Oscar Wilde
Failed audio engineer & pro studio tech turned Component level motherboard repair store in New York
Oscar Wilde
Failed audio engineer & pro studio tech turned Component level motherboard repair store in New York
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
So you're basically saying "point a decent sounding mic at the thing".RWC wrote:414 on the bridge in cardioid pointed towards the strings.
There's no other way to do it. The definition of a DI with the fullness of an amp, and you don't have to deal with the bullshit that occurs if their pickup is fucked up on the upright. Which, for me, has always buzzed, or stopped working in the middle of a session.
For me, it's an octava MK219 or some cheapass audio technica because, I cannot afford a 414. Maybe if I get more sessions. But the one time I did get to try the 414 this way, it kicked ass.
Sure. That works too!
Last edited by fossiltooth on Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Z MINOR SOUND
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 12:27 pm
- Location: Salinas, CA
- Contact:
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:55 pm
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/attachme ... ndsron.jpg
yeah right after I posted my reply, I found the gearslutz threads.
FOSSIL - I don't know how to make my point any clearer, and I think you're missing it... there's a difference between looking for "answers" and just wanting to hear about other people's experiences and from those - getting ideas for directions to explore.
Anyway - thanks for the rubber band trick... now you're gonna be in big trouble!
yeah right after I posted my reply, I found the gearslutz threads.
FOSSIL - I don't know how to make my point any clearer, and I think you're missing it... there's a difference between looking for "answers" and just wanting to hear about other people's experiences and from those - getting ideas for directions to explore.
Anyway - thanks for the rubber band trick... now you're gonna be in big trouble!
That's perfect, now I need you to change it all!
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 10890
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
- Location: Charlotte, NC
- Contact:
I record a decent amount of upright bass frequently in a variety of situations: traditional jazz, bluegrass, singer/songwriter, rockabilly, etc.
I've seen many, many different ways of recording upright bass and I've tried almost all of them at some point. It's interesting that many of the techniques that I've seen people use or heard them describe time and time again just don't work for me. I've heard plenty of great recordings that were allegedly made with some kind of large figure-eight ribbon mic pointing at the f-hole. For me, that's been about the boomiest possible scenario and any combination of those ingredients aren't far off, either. DI's never sound anything like the instrument to me. A mic down near the bottom (anywhere down there) combined with a mic up on the neck sounds unbalanced and artificial to me. The "omni in the bridge" thing can be cool, but a lot of the upright players in this area have those pickup systems that go under one leg of the bridge and leave a big, stiff cable running right across the gap between the bridge and the body, so you can't put a mic there. On top of that, you'd have to have a long-enough omni mic to get the positioning correct.
I've found two procedures that work really well in most instances, one of which works better than the other in terms of sound and unobtrusiveness, but can lead to difficult bleed issues if there are other instruments in the same room. The other is a decent compromise for that situation. I arrived at those techniques by listening and experimentation and are (as far as I've seen) unique to me.
It really is a bizarre instrument to mic and I have no idea why so many of the tried and true techniques don't work for me, but such is life.
Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC
I've seen many, many different ways of recording upright bass and I've tried almost all of them at some point. It's interesting that many of the techniques that I've seen people use or heard them describe time and time again just don't work for me. I've heard plenty of great recordings that were allegedly made with some kind of large figure-eight ribbon mic pointing at the f-hole. For me, that's been about the boomiest possible scenario and any combination of those ingredients aren't far off, either. DI's never sound anything like the instrument to me. A mic down near the bottom (anywhere down there) combined with a mic up on the neck sounds unbalanced and artificial to me. The "omni in the bridge" thing can be cool, but a lot of the upright players in this area have those pickup systems that go under one leg of the bridge and leave a big, stiff cable running right across the gap between the bridge and the body, so you can't put a mic there. On top of that, you'd have to have a long-enough omni mic to get the positioning correct.
I've found two procedures that work really well in most instances, one of which works better than the other in terms of sound and unobtrusiveness, but can lead to difficult bleed issues if there are other instruments in the same room. The other is a decent compromise for that situation. I arrived at those techniques by listening and experimentation and are (as far as I've seen) unique to me.
It really is a bizarre instrument to mic and I have no idea why so many of the tried and true techniques don't work for me, but such is life.
Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC
Gee, I thought I was the only one who can't get these approaches to work!cgarges wrote:I record a decent amount of upright bass frequently in a variety of situations: traditional jazz, bluegrass, singer/songwriter, rockabilly, etc.
I've seen many, many different ways of recording upright bass and I've tried almost all of them at some point. It's interesting that many of the techniques that I've seen people use or heard them describe time and time again just don't work for me. I've heard plenty of great recordings that were allegedly made with some kind of large figure-eight ribbon mic pointing at the f-hole. For me, that's been about the boomiest possible scenario and any combination of those ingredients aren't far off, either. DI's never sound anything like the instrument to me. A mic down near the bottom (anywhere down there) combined with a mic up on the neck sounds unbalanced and artificial to me. The "omni in the bridge" thing can be cool, but a lot of the upright players in this area have those pickup systems that go under one leg of the bridge and leave a big, stiff cable running right across the gap between the bridge and the body, so you can't put a mic there. On top of that, you'd have to have a long-enough omni mic to get the positioning correct.
I've found two procedures that work really well in most instances, one of which works better than the other in terms of sound and unobtrusiveness, but can lead to difficult bleed issues if there are other instruments in the same room. The other is a decent compromise for that situation. I arrived at those techniques by listening and experimentation and are (as far as I've seen) unique to me.
It really is a bizarre instrument to mic and I have no idea why so many of the tried and true techniques don't work for me, but such is life.
Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC
The one system that works consistantly for me is to place a SD omni (measurement mic) out front at approx the bridge height, plus a 414 at the player's shoulder height angled down to the upper bout. For more string attack, I'll replace the 414 with a SD condensor omni up close to the plucking hand. With other instruments in the room, I'll use cardioid mics.
Two important things I've learned when recording upright bass: 1) SD mics and omni mics have less proximity effect. Proximity effect is NOT what is desired when recording upright bass (not for me, anyway). 2) Size matters...of the room, that is. You need lots of air space for the lows to blossom without LF buildup and reflections to invade your mics.
I have been playing & recording upright bass for over 25 years, so I've had plenty of experiment time
I think women should leave the toilet seat UP!!!
- centurymantra
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:02 am
- Location: Michigan
- Contact:
MORE secrets...?! Man, I didn't realize that upright bass recipes were such a well guarded bit of audio alchemy.cgarges wrote: I've found two procedures that work really well in most instances, one of which works better than the other in terms of sound and unobtrusiveness, but can lead to difficult bleed issues if there are other instruments in the same room. The other is a decent compromise for that situation. I arrived at those techniques by listening and experimentation and are (as far as I've seen) unique to me.
Upright bass IS a tricky beast to record. I've gotten into it a fair amount lately, and have been falling back on the standard of 1 mic near the bridge out front and and SDC up near the hand, tweaked to minimize phase issues. Ribbons can be boomy, but can sound really cool too. I'm working with a bass/mandolin duo right now and an R84 down near the bridge witha an SDC up top sounds pretty great on this particular bass. I still feel like the upright bass is something I'm a LONG way from being comfortable with. An earlier post suggested an SDC down at the bottom with an LDC up top pointing down over the bout. I like that idea...have to try it. Then there's folks who are adamant about using one well placed mic, and I can fully appreciate this concept too. I need to do more experimenting. Recording a band recently with a number of instruments in the same room led me to use a dynamic down below (in this case a Beyer M88) near the bridge/f-hole pointing up. I considered the SDC up top in this scenario to be serving double duty as a 'room mic'.
__________________
Bryan
Shoeshine Recording Studio
"Pop music is sterile, country music is sterile. That's one of the reasons I keep going back to baseball" - Doug Sahm
Bryan
Shoeshine Recording Studio
"Pop music is sterile, country music is sterile. That's one of the reasons I keep going back to baseball" - Doug Sahm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests