"Sound cloak" makes surfaces impervious to sound.

brainfreezebob · Post by **brainfreezebob** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:44 pm

Could use a little in my space: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7450321.stm

kdarr · Post by **kdarr** » Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:09 pm

brainfreezebob wrote:Could use a little in my space: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7450321.stm

Not to get sidetracked, but you have the best avatar in history.

That is all.

[<|>]

jmiller · Post by **jmiller** » Sat Jun 14, 2008 3:35 am

kdarr wrote:
Not to get sidetracked, but you have the best avatar in history.

That is all.

[<|>]

I noticed that right away, too. Outstanding.

I read that article earlier today. I could really use a lot of it.
Pretty cool.

Aquaman · Post by **Aquaman** » Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:24 am

According to the article, you'd need about 200 layers of this product to be effective at low frequencies. Wake me up when they get it down to like 2 or something.

brainfreezebob · Post by **brainfreezebob** » Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:57 pm

kdarr wrote:
brainfreezebob wrote:Could use a little in my space: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7450321.stm
Not to get sidetracked, but you have the best avatar in history.

That is all.

[<|>]

First compliment ever. Thank you.

themagicmanmdt · Post by **themagicmanmdt** » Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:51 pm

MAGIC ALEX WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG

Message Board

"Sound cloak" makes surfaces impervious to sound.

"Sound cloak" makes surfaces impervious to sound.

Re: "Sound cloak" makes surfaces impervious to sou

Re: "Sound cloak" makes surfaces impervious to sou

Re: "Sound cloak" makes surfaces impervious to sou

Who is online