STAX/MOTOWN soul drum sound - how?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

User avatar
joninc
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2100
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: canada
Contact:

STAX/MOTOWN soul drum sound - how?

Post by joninc » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:03 am

hey all - i have been mesmerized by stax and motown for the past several years and would love to learn how they recorded the drums. please don't misunderstand me - i am not asking "how can i make recordings that sound like theirs?" - i know the player is key but i am just curious how they captured the sound. where did they place the mic(s)?

i'm assuming that its quite minimal micing -

mono overhead?

snare?

kick?

hat?

i know ribbons were very popular - i don't have any rca's but i have a coles and a m160. i figured the kick might be a D12 which i have as well...

i have done lots of reading about STAX and motown but not really found any clues or even good photos of the drums with mics..

i'd love it if anybody has insight here.

*yes i know stax used a wallet on the snare to help deaden and for the thud*
the new rules : there are no rules

sparky
pushin' record
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:47 am
Location: Brooklyn

Post by sparky » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:25 am

Image[/img]

rwc
resurrected
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:21 pm
Location: Bed Stuy, Brooklyn

Post by rwc » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:28 am

From what I've read a lot of it was a FET47 on the kick, km84 on the snare, and a U67 overhead bussed to one track on tape.
Real friends stab you in the front.

Oscar Wilde

Failed audio engineer & pro studio tech turned Component level motherboard repair store in New York

User avatar
joninc
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2100
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: canada
Contact:

Post by joninc » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:29 am

ahh! i just googled it and found that picture as well. i always was under the impression that the room was much smaller than that. the photos around the piano make it seem a lot more intimate.

so - what mic is that overhead? looks small - maybe a 635?

looks like no kick mic and something on a boom towards the floor tom...

like the glyn johns 3 mic technique *minus the kick* maybe?
the new rules : there are no rules

User avatar
joninc
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2100
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: canada
Contact:

Post by joninc » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:35 am

they got such a dry punchy sound in that big cavern! i guess the gobos are the key there.
the new rules : there are no rules

RoyMatthews
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 778
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Sunnyside Queens, NY

Post by RoyMatthews » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:39 am

There looks like there is a kick mic. If you look at the rim just in from the left is (I think) a xlr connector. The mic is black near the top of the kick aimed 'bout 45 deg. down.
The OH. Maybe a KM84[/list]
"If there's one ironclad rule of pop history, it's this: The monkey types Hamlet only once."

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:45 am

Stax was in an old movie theatre. Motown's place in Detroit was much smaller.

The overhead in the photo doesn't look like a 635A to me. I would have guessed a KM84 or KM54 or something like that, although the one in the photo does look a bit longer. I'm sure stuff would have changed occasionally, especially over the period of time those labels were operational. For instance, although a FET 47 may have been used on some of that stuff, it wasn't developed until 1969, so anything prior to that would have been something else. I've hard lots of different stories about and seen lots of different photos of what was used on that stuff over the years.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

User avatar
joninc
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2100
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: canada
Contact:

Post by joninc » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:52 am

cgarges wrote:I've hard lots of different stories about and seen lots of different photos of what was used on that stuff over the years.
do tell....

(it does look like a km 84 -no bulb on the end like a 635)
the new rules : there are no rules

User avatar
joninc
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2100
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: canada
Contact:

Post by joninc » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:53 am

what do you think the drum riser contributed to the tone of the kit?
the new rules : there are no rules

User avatar
Recycled_Brains
resurrected
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:58 pm
Location: Albany, NY
Contact:

Post by Recycled_Brains » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:55 am

http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/index. ... msg_146017

That thread outta answer some questions.
Ryan Slowey
Albany, NY

http://maggotbrainny.bandcamp.com

User avatar
joninc
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2100
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: canada
Contact:

Post by joninc » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:17 am

great thread! thanks for sharing that.

"I always thought that the old school memphis sound was recorded in an old school in memphis"
the new rules : there are no rules

User avatar
Recycled_Brains
resurrected
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:58 pm
Location: Albany, NY
Contact:

Post by Recycled_Brains » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:21 am

I did a session a few months back and the drummer and I were talking about the wallet trick while I was micing things up.

We recorded one song where the snare sounded particularly cool. I asked him what he did...

Well.... take a wild guess.
Ryan Slowey
Albany, NY

http://maggotbrainny.bandcamp.com

sparky
pushin' record
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:47 am
Location: Brooklyn

Post by sparky » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:25 am

the problem is you need a mid 60s sears-roebuck tri-fold for the most warmth, filled with all pre-1970 currency. a double fold has a cool sound too, but its a bit bightier in the uppermids. Today's wallets, filled with today's money, have a too-detailed overly harsh sound, I think.

User avatar
joninc
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2100
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:02 pm
Location: canada
Contact:

Post by joninc » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:29 am

especially the digital ones ;)
the new rules : there are no rules

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:36 am

joninc wrote:
cgarges wrote:I've hard lots of different stories about and seen lots of different photos of what was used on that stuff over the years.
do tell....
Same stuff as mentioned in that thread. I've seen pics of Al Jackson at a kit with an RCA 77 overhead. I've also seen different pictures of Roger Hawkins with KM54s and U67s as overheads. I also know that a lot of guys from that period (like Tom Dowd) were using Altec 639s or 633s on bass drum (when there was a bass drum mic) or sometimes EV 666s. (I'm about 99% sure that's what was used on "Papa's Got A Brand New Bag.")

Of the Motown multitrack masters that I've heard (probaby the same ones a lot of you guys have heard), drums were usually printed to one track, sometimes two if there was a separate bass drum track on a 16-track session. The sound of the drums individually was pretty unremarkable, but totally awesome at the same time.

I would bet that a lot of what was cool about the drum sound on some of those records (Aretha's version of "Respect" comes to mind, even though that was Tom Down engineering for Atlantic) had everything to do with whatever other mics were open in the room.

Of course, I wasn't there, but that's my two cents.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC
Last edited by cgarges on Fri Sep 26, 2008 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests