Sonar user -> Reaper experimenter

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
LeedyGuy
tinnitus
Posts: 1032
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 9:15 am
Location: Dirty Jerzey
Contact:

Sonar user -> Reaper experimenter

Post by LeedyGuy » Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:32 pm

Okay so I am trying Reaper today. So far, it's been a few hours and I have been able to record audio, play it back, and add some effects. My initial impression is that this is a great program and really easy to use right off the bat, but doing anything that I think should be easy (or at least was really quick and easy in Sonar) sometimes takes me several menus deep.

A few questions though from anyone who can help me out because I just can't figure it out.

1. In order to make a send, I created a new track (named reverb) then I made my guitar track send through it and added a Waves RVerb and made an attempt at trying to figure out what all those sliders all over the place meant. Is that right? I'm not sure how I feel about having the reverb be a track rather than a bus...but I can't figure out how to bus anything anyway!

2. How do I solo a track AND here the send as well? In Sonar, if you solo anything, it plays it with all the sends etc. that are tacked on it. In Reaper, I'm getting a no-send solo signal. Weird or am I too used to Sonar?

3. How do I delete a piece of a track? In Sonar, I just click on the picture of the audio and it highlights and then I press Delete and it's gone. Reaper deletes half my other tracks as well when I try to do this!

Any other long time (since Sonar 1!!) users out there trying to make this switch?

-Ken
Current band - www.myspace.com/nickafflittomusic
My music - www.myspace.com/kenadessamusic
Recording space - www.myspace.com/twinreverbsound
HOT soul music - www.enzoandthebakers.com
Freelance drum hookups available constantly

mjau
speech impediment
Posts: 4030
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Orlando
Contact:

Re: Sonar user -> Reaper experimenter

Post by mjau » Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:59 am

kentothink wrote:Any other long time (since Sonar 1!!) users out there trying to make this switch?

-Ken
I tried, but gave up after a few attempts. I'm too used to the Sonar interface, and I've learned all the keystroke shortcuts and all that fun stuff. I'm still on Sonar 3.1...so that tells you that I'm not one to change it up much.

Wilkesin
steve albini likes it
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:03 pm

Post by Wilkesin » Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:13 pm

Hmmh,

1. Call it a bus, a track, or a whatsawhosit, but all you have to do is create one, plop a reverb on it, click the IO button on that track either in the track control panel or the mix control panel, click the receives drop down menu and click on gtr or whatever channel (by name) you want that reverb on. ..

2.When you solo the gtr track you should still hear the reverb (automatically solo safe). The sliders are there for level and panning but should already be set.

3.works for me, just be sure that you only have that item highlighted.
Slider wrote:"we figured you'd want to use your drum samples and reamp through your amps anyway, so we didn't bother taking much time to get sounds".

LeedyGuy
tinnitus
Posts: 1032
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 9:15 am
Location: Dirty Jerzey
Contact:

Post by LeedyGuy » Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:17 pm

1. Got it. A little getting used to, but...awesome.

2. Okay, I have no idea what I was thinking before. Works fine.

3. If I click on an item (track 6 let's say) and it turns green I then hit delete and a large portion of track 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 is ALSO deleted. Am I the only one? Do I have something set weird? The part that gets deleted seems to have nothing to do with anything...seemingly random!!
Current band - www.myspace.com/nickafflittomusic
My music - www.myspace.com/kenadessamusic
Recording space - www.myspace.com/twinreverbsound
HOT soul music - www.enzoandthebakers.com
Freelance drum hookups available constantly

jakerock
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Post by jakerock » Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:43 pm

Did you possibly group the items together by hitting "G"?
To see if you did:

select the item that you are trying to delete and hit "U" to Ungroup it,

or right click on the item, GROUP>"select all of selected items groups"
Then hit "U" to ungroup all of the items in the group

Then see if you can delete to one item!


Best, Jake

Wilkesin
steve albini likes it
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:03 pm

Post by Wilkesin » Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:37 pm

be sure you are clicking on the waveform/item within the track and not the track itself on the left edge of the screen because (i think) that will delete the entire track and then Reaper automatically renumbers all previous and subsequent tracks to keep them in sequential order...
Slider wrote:"we figured you'd want to use your drum samples and reamp through your amps anyway, so we didn't bother taking much time to get sounds".

Tallisman
audio school
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:23 pm
Location: Fort Smith Canada
Contact:

Post by Tallisman » Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:38 pm

Jake item grouping doesn't work like that here.
It sounds like inadvertent adjacent selection, to me, but I can't reproduce that here...

Kentothink... you have probably already figured all this out but try it anyway:
* right-click+drag = marquee selection.
* add [Alt] before releasing the right mouse button, to make a marquee + time selection (try this over the portions of an item you want to delete, then press ctrl+delete)

*quickly send a bunch of tracks to the same reverb: select the tracks in the TCP, right-click the i/o icon on one of them and navigate -->Sends-->the track you want

*...you have created a track and put a reverb on it. Right click the i/o button-->Receives-->the track(s) you want feeding the reverb.


if you come and visit us over at the forum dot cockos dot com, you will find a good many longer time sonar users happy to help (many of whom are still active sonar users and cakewalk forum members - who said daw affiliation has to be exclusive?)

greetings
.t
it ain't no beans in ice cream. baby!

User avatar
calaverasgrandes
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3233
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: Oakland
Contact:

Post by calaverasgrandes » Wed Oct 15, 2008 11:41 am

I tried Reaper a year or two ago and found it fast and flexible.
But I also found it very ugly. Maybe its my OCD or my ADHD or some other acronym, but the visual interface was just too cluttered and unorganized. Iwas always squinting at my screen and getting headaches.
I guess I would make the analogy of linux.
I have installed linux on several machines. Its interesting, it goes faster for given hardware than windows. It's flexible and powerful. But at the end of the day I just want my windows back. Call me when this linux thing has a compelling thing that windows lacks.
Reaper is kinda the same thing. It works, but it doesnt compel me to use it.
??????? wrote: "everything sounds best right before it blows up."

Tallisman
audio school
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:23 pm
Location: Fort Smith Canada
Contact:

Post by Tallisman » Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:14 pm

In deed reaper was fugly! and by some accounts it still is despite the efforts of White Tie, and the many, many themers. But cluttered? I gues it could be considered such. Personally I am lobbying to see some of the empty GUI space donated to some new tools and macro buttons.

Image

be well

.t
calaverasgrandes wrote:I tried Reaper a year or two ago and found it fast and flexible.
But I also found it very ugly. Maybe its my OCD or my ADHD or some other acronym, but the visual interface was just too cluttered and unorganized. Iwas always squinting at my screen and getting headaches.
I guess I would make the analogy of linux.
I have installed linux on several machines. Its interesting, it goes faster for given hardware than windows. It's flexible and powerful. But at the end of the day I just want my windows back. Call me when this linux thing has a compelling thing that windows lacks.
Reaper is kinda the same thing. It works, but it doesnt compel me to use it.
it ain't no beans in ice cream. baby!

LeedyGuy
tinnitus
Posts: 1032
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 9:15 am
Location: Dirty Jerzey
Contact:

Post by LeedyGuy » Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:42 pm

Yeah, I had something called ripple editing enabled as well as item grouping via those little push things in the upper left hand corner. Man that was causing me a world of hurt! This is a breeze now.
Current band - www.myspace.com/nickafflittomusic
My music - www.myspace.com/kenadessamusic
Recording space - www.myspace.com/twinreverbsound
HOT soul music - www.enzoandthebakers.com
Freelance drum hookups available constantly

User avatar
calaverasgrandes
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3233
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: Oakland
Contact:

Post by calaverasgrandes » Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:10 pm

its not so much the usage of empty space or not. Sonar and cubase tend to eat up every pixel with buttons and such. But it also is obvious that they spent a while refining their gui. Sonar is the 3rd generation for TTS. And its on its 8th rev now. So they have had a while to refine the visual space. Stupid things like how big the buttons are and how the meters work tend to influence what we "feel" about the DAWs.
I wish reaper all the luck in teh world though. because as it stands NONE of the major DAWs are independent. Cubase=Yamaha, Sonar=Roland, PT=Avid. Sure their are others, but who is gonna use frooty loops studio for all their production?
??????? wrote: "everything sounds best right before it blows up."

User avatar
@?,*???&?
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5804
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Just left on the FM dial
Contact:

Post by @?,*???&? » Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:32 pm

calaverasgrandes wrote:I tried Reaper a year or two ago and found it fast and flexible.
But I also found it very ugly. Maybe its my OCD or my ADHD or some other acronym, but the visual interface was just too cluttered and unorganized. Iwas always squinting at my screen and getting headaches.
I guess I would make the analogy of linux.
I have installed linux on several machines. Its interesting, it goes faster for given hardware than windows. It's flexible and powerful. But at the end of the day I just want my windows back. Call me when this linux thing has a compelling thing that windows lacks.
Reaper is kinda the same thing. It works, but it doesnt compel me to use it.
Are you making records or recording these days?

User avatar
calaverasgrandes
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3233
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: Oakland
Contact:

Post by calaverasgrandes » Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:36 pm

@?,*???&? wrote:
calaverasgrandes wrote:I tried Reaper a year or two ago and found it fast and flexible.
But I also found it very ugly. Maybe its my OCD or my ADHD or some other acronym, but the visual interface was just too cluttered and unorganized. Iwas always squinting at my screen and getting headaches.
I guess I would make the analogy of linux.
I have installed linux on several machines. Its interesting, it goes faster for given hardware than windows. It's flexible and powerful. But at the end of the day I just want my windows back. Call me when this linux thing has a compelling thing that windows lacks.
Reaper is kinda the same thing. It works, but it doesnt compel me to use it.
Are you making records or recording these days?
No I am making CDs
Only turntablists, punk rockers and stoner metalers make records.
??????? wrote: "everything sounds best right before it blows up."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 334 guests