directionality in cable?
- calaverasgrandes
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
- Location: Oakland
- Contact:
directionality in cable?
I am curious what others think of directionality in cables. Or polarization. Where a cable will sound differently from one direction than it will if you reverse ends. Have you experienced it? Do you think it's a bunk idea? Do you own "directional" cables?
Last edited by calaverasgrandes on Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
??????? wrote: "everything sounds best right before it blows up."
- ;ivlunsdystf
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:15 am
- Location: The Great Frontier of the Southern Anoka Sand Plain
- Contact:
There's no "Directionality in cable is bullshit, the audible phenomenon doesn't exist" option, or I'd tick it.
UPDATE: My vote is cast.
UPDATE: My vote is cast.
Last edited by ;ivlunsdystf on Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- calaverasgrandes
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
- Location: Oakland
- Contact:
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:45 pm
- Location: Sunny Tucson
Re: directionality in cable?
Anyone who thinks that cable is "directional" is a fucking idiot.calaverasgrandes wrote:I am curious what others think of directionality in cables. Or polarization. Where a cable will sound differently from one direction than it will if you reverse ends. Have you experienced it? Do you think it's a bunk idea? Do you own "directional" cables?
-a
"On the internet, nobody can hear you mix a band."
- calaverasgrandes
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
- Location: Oakland
- Contact:
Re: directionality in cable?
You know, I came here because I was told that they folks on the tape-op boards were more inteligent and friendly but you make me wonder if I was lied to...Andy Peters wrote: Anyone who thinks that cable is "directional" is a fucking idiot.
-a
A cable can be directional in two ways:
The first is in which the shield is floated on one end. THAT IS DIRECTIONAL, and calling people "fucking idiots" doesn't chance a scientific fact.
The 2nd way has to do with solid core cables, specificly EA and you can read about it here:
http://www.peerlesstone.com/node/96
And, here:
http://www.thegearpage.net/board/showth ... ?p=5088470
John Mayer uses a sold core cable that he likes to reverse the direction on because he likes the tone better (No, I'm not a fan of his so don't bother going down that road).
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:07 pm
- Location: Sunnyside Queens, NY
Re: directionality in cable?
Neither of those links are very conclusive or convincing.BOWIE wrote:You know, I came here because I was told that they folks on the tape-op boards were more inteligent and friendly but you make me wonder if I was lied to...Andy Peters wrote: Anyone who thinks that cable is "directional" is a fucking idiot.
-a
A cable can be directional in two ways:
The first is in which the shield is floated on one end. THAT IS DIRECTIONAL, and calling people "fucking idiots" doesn't chance a scientific fact.
The 2nd way has to do with solid core cables, specificly EA and you can read about it here:
http://www.peerlesstone.com/node/96
And, here:
http://www.thegearpage.net/board/showth ... ?p=5088470
John Mayer uses a sold core cable that he likes to reverse the direction on because he likes the tone better (No, I'm not a fan of his so don't bother going down that road).
"If there's one ironclad rule of pop history, it's this: The monkey types Hamlet only once."
john mayer also spends $50 on a bottle of water.
Real friends stab you in the front.
Oscar Wilde
Failed audio engineer & pro studio tech turned Component level motherboard repair store in New York
Oscar Wilde
Failed audio engineer & pro studio tech turned Component level motherboard repair store in New York
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:07 pm
- Location: Sunnyside Queens, NY
I only got 5 pages in but it seems this thread seems to have the most reasonable discussion on the topic:
http://www.thegearpage.net/board/showth ... p?t=433095
http://www.thegearpage.net/board/showth ... p?t=433095
"If there's one ironclad rule of pop history, it's this: The monkey types Hamlet only once."
Re: directionality in cable?
Well, I'm not interested in convincing anyone but for those who actually want to learn what it's about, and benefit from it, here's a good explanation of the first case of directionality taken from Planet Waves:RoyMatthews wrote: Neither of those links are very conclusive or convincing.
"This configuration provides the best shielding against external noise. The shield intercepts external noise and diverts it to the amplifier ground, reducing interference. Connecting the shield to the amplifier end provides the shortest and most direct path to the amplifier ground and maximizes the shielding effectiveness. If the shield is connected at the guitar end, the intercepted noise is forced to travel through the cable before reaching the amplifier ground; this causes extra noise pickup by the cable and reduces shielding effectiveness. If the shield is connected at both ends, some of the noise can still travel through the cable before reaching the amplifier ground, thereby reducing shielding effectiveness."
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:07 pm
- Location: Sunnyside Queens, NY
I think the lifting of the shield is really a different issue. I wouldn't really even refer to it as 'directionality'. When this topic usually comes up the question is usually whether or not cable sounds better in one direction or another. Lifting the shield on one end is a noise issue not tone. Sure less noise will probably make the overall tone better but the audiophile belief is that the sound 'flows' better in one direction due to a grain that develops in the manufacturing process. Lifting the shield would be separate from the discussion because the end that's lifted might not coincide with the 'grain'. The tone might be better the noisy way.
I think it's hogwash. I couldn't see how this supposed grain would have any effect on the electrons. I'm sure someone with a firmer grasp of the physics could explain why it shouldn't matter better than i could.
Especially after all that turkey.
I think it's hogwash. I couldn't see how this supposed grain would have any effect on the electrons. I'm sure someone with a firmer grasp of the physics could explain why it shouldn't matter better than i could.
Especially after all that turkey.
"If there's one ironclad rule of pop history, it's this: The monkey types Hamlet only once."
I know what you mean! I am supposed to be screening tubes for customers but all that turkey kicked my ass. I ate so much my ears started poping.RoyMatthews wrote:I'm sure someone with a firmer grasp of the physics could explain why it shouldn't matter better than i could.
Especially after all that turkey.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], T-rex and 148 guests