Best software mix buss
-
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3490
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:11 pm
- Location: Saint Paul, MN
Best software mix buss
So here's a straight up question: which DAW has the best sounding mix buss? As in mixing down to the final 2 track?
Any opinions welcome....
Any opinions welcome....
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5572
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
Re: Best software mix buss
None of them. All of them.kayagum wrote:So here's a straight up question: which DAW has the best sounding mix buss? As in mixing down to the final 2 track?
Any opinions welcome....
I typically will mixdown ITB , but leave headroom, so as to accomplish 2 things, one, enough room for the mastering engineer, and two, avoiding inter sample clipping, by not reaching the top level.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- Jay Reynolds
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:48 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
-
- speech impediment
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
- Contact:
I agree with that.superaction80 wrote:I know I like neither Reason's nor Garageband's mix buss. Not sure after that...
I also have never had a good ITB mixing experience with DP 5. I mostly use DP for projects that will be mixed on an analog board. But, the few times I've tried mixing inside DP have been unsatisfying.
I love mixing in Cubase. Bur, I've also mixed hundreds of songs in Cubase. It might just be a familiarity thing. It might just be the scale of the faders in the GUI. I don't know. It seems like the DP faders are a little shorter.
Yeah, I really like Nuendo... I can't be sure if it actually sounds better but it seems to sound better to me...However I still buss everything into 16 channels of my board for mixdown cause I like it like that.
Many people feel the Nuendo mix buss is superior, they certainly advertise it as god's gift to audio... maybe it's hype?
Many people feel the Nuendo mix buss is superior, they certainly advertise it as god's gift to audio... maybe it's hype?
Everything louder than everything else.
-
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 7:30 pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
- Contact:
- Jay Reynolds
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:48 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
I was on Cubase for years and recently switched to Logic and I don't notice a difference. This is a wholly unscientific and untested opinion.
Same goes for Ableton Live, though I only really print mixes in Live for reference purposes and I have yet to do a full-fledged mix with it.
Same goes for Ableton Live, though I only really print mixes in Live for reference purposes and I have yet to do a full-fledged mix with it.
Prog out with your cog out.
-
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3490
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:11 pm
- Location: Saint Paul, MN
Audition and Tracktion. Audition will always be a permanent tool for me just for some of the wav editing plugins like noise reduction. Tracktion came with my interface, and I'm still in the beginning stages of putting it through its paces.audiogeek1 wrote:What software do you own? Make that sound the best it can. There has been no real study of Mix buses that I have seen. I use pro tools and it works.
Mike
Just seeing if I'm missing anything out there in DAW land.
- Jeff White
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3263
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
I happen to love mixing in Digital Performer. To each their own.
Pan law is involved, aside from that most mix busses should sound the same. This has been hashed and rehashed over and over again here and at Gearslutz, with people over there trashing every program at some point as sounding like dog shit. They don't and people make great sounding records in Pro Tools LE, Logic, Digital Performer, Sonar, Cubase, etc every day.
The only time I heard a difference was mixing internally in Live 4 vs. DP4.61. And that was with warping on every track in Live eating the CPU in my G5. I learned to warp a track in live and rerecord it in digital Performer and mix in Digital Performer. So I use Live 5 more like a sampler than anything else. However, I'm sure that Live 7 or whatever is out now sound fine.
Also, in my travels, there is a huge difference between running 24 tracks of dry WAV files (or whatever) through any mix bus in a DAW or applying plug-ins across these tracks. I've been working in Digital Performer long enough to realize that there are some AU plug-ins that do not take high levels well at input. They will clip or distort. I'm talking about WAVES, IK Multimedia, etc. Even if you record hotter than the -15dBfs or whatever (aim for the middle), you can still insert a Trim plug-in set to -12dB before your insert effects chain that will totally help things and make this a non issue. And I sometimes insert another Trim post fx to bring thing up a bit. I do this all the time and believe me, my mixes sound much much better in 2008 than in 2005.
Jeff
Pan law is involved, aside from that most mix busses should sound the same. This has been hashed and rehashed over and over again here and at Gearslutz, with people over there trashing every program at some point as sounding like dog shit. They don't and people make great sounding records in Pro Tools LE, Logic, Digital Performer, Sonar, Cubase, etc every day.
The only time I heard a difference was mixing internally in Live 4 vs. DP4.61. And that was with warping on every track in Live eating the CPU in my G5. I learned to warp a track in live and rerecord it in digital Performer and mix in Digital Performer. So I use Live 5 more like a sampler than anything else. However, I'm sure that Live 7 or whatever is out now sound fine.
Also, in my travels, there is a huge difference between running 24 tracks of dry WAV files (or whatever) through any mix bus in a DAW or applying plug-ins across these tracks. I've been working in Digital Performer long enough to realize that there are some AU plug-ins that do not take high levels well at input. They will clip or distort. I'm talking about WAVES, IK Multimedia, etc. Even if you record hotter than the -15dBfs or whatever (aim for the middle), you can still insert a Trim plug-in set to -12dB before your insert effects chain that will totally help things and make this a non issue. And I sometimes insert another Trim post fx to bring thing up a bit. I do this all the time and believe me, my mixes sound much much better in 2008 than in 2005.
Jeff
I record, mix, and master in my Philly-based home studio, the Spacement. https://linktr.ee/ipressrecord
I've tried to hold off, but I'm compelled to make the obligatory Reaper plug.
Reaper uses 64 bit internal math processing. Apparently some other DAWs do/did not (although many/most may now).
I've read that some of the problems with "cloudy mixes" in the past was not enough processing headroom available when one tries to jam all the multiple tracks into the 2-mix buss.
Supposedly 64 bit internal processing removes this problem.
Reaper uses 64 bit internal math processing. Apparently some other DAWs do/did not (although many/most may now).
I've read that some of the problems with "cloudy mixes" in the past was not enough processing headroom available when one tries to jam all the multiple tracks into the 2-mix buss.
Supposedly 64 bit internal processing removes this problem.
"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."
I don't have much to compare to, but when I switched from Vegas (yeah, yeah) to Sonar a few years ago, the difference was HUGE. I think Sonar sounds awesome. And it does have the 64-bit internal business going on.
I also have never noticed much about the mixdown from Pro Tools LE in the last few years, and that's a compliment in my book.
I also have never noticed much about the mixdown from Pro Tools LE in the last few years, and that's a compliment in my book.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests