xy capsule positioning?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
User avatar
Dave Stanley
pushin' record
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:46 am
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

xy capsule positioning?

Post by Dave Stanley » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:18 am

Quick question(s), what's the proper way to position capusles for an XY setup?

Do you make an X w/ the capsules by putting one mic top of one another?

Do you form a V by pointing the mics torward one another?

Do you form a upside down V by putting the mics on top of one another?


OR does it really matter? :)
Sorry for the lame questions!

User avatar
suppositron
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 456
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 6:59 am
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Post by suppositron » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:24 am

I think the proper way is to have the capsules on top of one another, but I've done the V thing when my stands wouldn't quite reach. The point is to get the capsules as close together as possible. That way any phase difference between the two is shifted just about out of the audible range.

User avatar
Dave Stanley
pushin' record
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:46 am
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Post by Dave Stanley » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:24 am

Shoot, I just googled it. :oops:

The answer is B, form a V by facing the capsules toward one another at a 90 degree angle.

But, I dont think that the X method would hurt a recording.

User avatar
Dave Stanley
pushin' record
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:46 am
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Post by Dave Stanley » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:25 am

And thanks suppositron for the speedy reply!

MoreSpaceEcho
zen recordist
Posts: 6677
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am

Post by MoreSpaceEcho » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:46 am

i've always done it with the capsules on top of each other. i have an akg c33e stereo mic, and this is how the capsules are on that, i'm trusting that they made it correctly...

vorian
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:48 am
Location: AZ

Post by vorian » Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:03 am

It seems like having them on top of each other makes more sense for a couple of reasons.

1. However minimal reflections might be, the V option would cause stuff to be reflected off one mic into the other. With the mics on top of each other this couldn't happen.

2. The direct sound is what's going to be the loudest, and the on-top-of-each-other setup has the capsules closer together in terms of direct sound traveling on a roughly horizontal axis.

That said, would you hear a difference? Seems a bit close to call. I've done it both ways and while I've never specifically listened for a difference I've certainly never noticed one.

:shrug:

KyleWieder
audio school
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:24 am

Post by KyleWieder » Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:28 am

You can place them in a V and you will get a wider stereo spread often

User avatar
Ryan Silva
tinnitus
Posts: 1229
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:46 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by Ryan Silva » Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:59 pm

Why the hell is it called xy?

Paging the professor, paging the professor
"Writing good songs is hard. recording is easy. "

MoreSpaceEcho

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:03 pm

Ryan Silva wrote:Why the hell is it called xy?
Google "Cartesian coordinates"
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7488
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Post by drumsound » Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:05 pm

I do the V and it works quite well...

Professor
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:11 pm
Location: I have arrived... but where the hell am I?

Post by Professor » Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:36 pm

Ryan Silva wrote:Why the hell is it called xy?

Paging the professor, paging the professor
Yo!


I have to admit that on the history of the name I've never heard or read any kind of explanation and I never really cared enough to go find one. My best guess would be that Alan Blumlein named it when he patented everything else about stereo recording in 1931, but I don't recall whether he used the 'XY' to describe that technique there let alone whether he explained why that would be the best choice of names for the technique. I always assumed it was a cartesian coordinate reference also, but then again that doesn't really make much sense either. On a 2-channel oscilloscope AB-mode is where both signals are displayed separately and XY-mode is where the two signals are compared on an XY graph to watch the phase coherence, but I don't know if that's where they took the name for the mic placement.


But as for the placement of the capsules, it doesn't really matter just as long as they are as close as possible to one another.
Dual LDC stereo mics like the AKG C-24 & C-422, the Neumann USM 69, and all the similar models out there have the two capsules stacked with at least one capsule able to rotate to adjust the angle. (Remember 90? is just the 'textbook' setup and you could wider or narrower as you like.) The Rode NT-4 is fixed at 90? and stacked. The Audio Technica AT-822 & AT-825 mics are edge-to-edge in an inverted V if I remember correctly, while the new little Sony palm recorder is edge-to-edge in a V (capsules facing each other).
What I usually to do demonstrate the setup in class is I hold up two coins representing the diaphragms of the mics and explain that they have to be as close as possible to the same point in space and set at a right angle (to start with at least). When you do that, the edge-to-edge "V" setup seems much more obvious.

The reflections idea sounds like a pretty reasonable explanation for stacking capsules, but more so on LDCs where the far edges would actually be about 1.5" apart. With SDCs any phase cancellations from reflections would be at a high enough frequency to be inaudible.
Although I would have to say that my best guess at why the capsules are stacked in those dual-LDC mics is because it's easier to build them that way, especially if you want to be able to adjust the angles between the capsules.

Hope that helps.

-Jeremy

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests