Original Rode Classic vs Classic 2

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
btswire
gettin' sounds
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 6:56 pm
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Original Rode Classic vs Classic 2

Post by btswire » Tue Feb 03, 2009 3:21 pm

I have a Rode Classic mic that I sent out for repair. The power supply needs new parts, which unfortunately are no longer being manufactured. I was offered a new Classic 2 as a replacement. Does anyone have any comments on how these two mics differ in sound quality? On gearslutz someone mentioned that the Classic 2 is brighter with less low end boost, and can be grainy in the hi end. Any impressions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Re: Original Rode Classic vs Classic 2

Post by joel hamilton » Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:46 am

btswire wrote:I have a Rode Classic mic that I sent out for repair. The power supply needs new parts, which unfortunately are no longer being manufactured. I was offered a new Classic 2 as a replacement. Does anyone have any comments on how these two mics differ in sound quality? On gearslutz someone mentioned that the Classic 2 is brighter with less low end boost, and can be grainy in the hi end. Any impressions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
The classic sounds better than the classic II. I dont know why, but it is true.
keep the classic, thats my opinion.
I have used both a bunch, back before Rode wa available everywwhere and it felt like a cool , weird "boutique" brand... kind of like the oktava 012's that I love so much and really had a unique thing in 1999, but not anymore...
anyway, the classic sounds like a classic microphone.really. the classic II sounds like any old microphone being made today. like any of the condenser mics in the 1000-2000 range.

kayagum
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:11 pm
Location: Saint Paul, MN

Post by kayagum » Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:47 am

Shot in the dark- would the Hamptone tube mic power supply work?

You could try emailing Scott to see if his stuff would work, or just get some advice....

http://hamptone.com/v/content/oldsite/about___.htm

Edit: dang, post #3000 :D

studjo
audio school
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:04 pm

Post by studjo » Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:07 pm

I hardly use my Classic - it's way too bright for most sources. You guys have darker mics or is my mic getting old in a strange way?

User avatar
Slider
george martin
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 2:00 pm

Post by Slider » Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:41 pm

My classic is bright too but then again, so is a C12.
I put a big U87 foam pop filter on mine. Knocks the top down a bit and retains the character of the mic all with no eq!
I also prefer the original over the II version.
On the right voice the Classic is REALLY good. The trick is knowing when to use it.

kayagum
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:11 pm
Location: Saint Paul, MN

Post by kayagum » Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:28 pm

Here's a better page for the Hamptone power supplies:

http://hamptone.com/v/content/tmps_info.html

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Post by joel hamilton » Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:24 am

Slider wrote: The trick is knowing when to use it.
This is the answer for like 90% of the questions about gear on this forum.

kayagum
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:11 pm
Location: Saint Paul, MN

Post by kayagum » Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:54 am

Isn't it more like 99.9% Joel? :D

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Post by joel hamilton » Thu Feb 05, 2009 6:55 pm

kayagum wrote:Isn't it more like 99.9% Joel? :D
10% would be "why" you are using it.... ;)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Theo_Karon and 99 guests