300 Hz and below in MONO? (for vinyl)
- stevedood
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:00 am
- Location: Berkeley, CA
- Contact:
300 Hz and below in MONO? (for vinyl)
what's the easiest method to get 300 Hz and below of a stereo WAV file to be in MONO (panned center)? I'm assisting an artist with prepping files for vinyl.
I have Cubase & Wavelab at my disposal.
Within Cubase, I am guessing I would high pass filter the stereo track above 300 Hz and then create a mono duplicate which gets the low pass filter below 300 Hz, even summing between the two and hope the EQ doesn't mess up the phase.
Would this work ok?
Any other ideas?
thanks,
steve
I have Cubase & Wavelab at my disposal.
Within Cubase, I am guessing I would high pass filter the stereo track above 300 Hz and then create a mono duplicate which gets the low pass filter below 300 Hz, even summing between the two and hope the EQ doesn't mess up the phase.
Would this work ok?
Any other ideas?
thanks,
steve
Re: 300 Hz and below in MONO? (for vinyl)
Easiest? How's about Basslane? Freeware VST does exactly what you want without all the bussing, possible latency induced phase shifts, etc.
There are others out there, google Bass Management and you'll find a few. Most are designed for multi-channel surround audio, but should work.
There are others out there, google Bass Management and you'll find a few. Most are designed for multi-channel surround audio, but should work.
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
Leave the low end to your cutting engineer. It is a myth that it's standard practice to mono the low end on vinyl. It's done, but not always.
I've never monoed my bass before sending it off to be cut to lacquers and the cutting guys never complained.
I should have a lathe in the next several months or so and my opinion may change after that.
I've never monoed my bass before sending it off to be cut to lacquers and the cutting guys never complained.
I should have a lathe in the next several months or so and my opinion may change after that.
-
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3307
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:11 pm
- Location: I have arrived... but where the hell am I?
For that matter, 300Hz is hardly just the low-end, that's just above middle C. That's 4 octaves out of ten that we can hear. Nothing wrong with choosing that as the starting point for your roll off, but you may want to keep that at a more shallow crossover point.
The thing to be more concerned with is the high frequencies. I had a group take a project to URP for a small vinyl package, and the cutter just obliterated the high-end with something like an 18dB/octave roll off from 6kHz. And I had done a lot of work to smooth the top end, control 'S' sounds and limit stuff above 12k. I'm not entirely sure the company even listened before the pressing.
-Jeremy
The thing to be more concerned with is the high frequencies. I had a group take a project to URP for a small vinyl package, and the cutter just obliterated the high-end with something like an 18dB/octave roll off from 6kHz. And I had done a lot of work to smooth the top end, control 'S' sounds and limit stuff above 12k. I'm not entirely sure the company even listened before the pressing.
-Jeremy
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests