tascam ms 16 help--punch ins
tascam ms 16 help--punch ins
punching in is no problem, but punching out always leaves a noticeable gap between old and new. basically, punching out is not possible unless there's a good blank space, like a comfortable distance between lines for the lead vocals.
what the hell?
what the hell?
- woodhenge
- pushin' record
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 11:28 am
- Location: Hangin' with Jake and Elwood @Bob's Country Bunker, Indiana
You're making me miss my old Tascam!
The glitch is caused by the gap between the erase head and the record head. The faster the tape machine is (or the closer the heads are together), the less of a dropout you'll have. About the only ways around this are to run it as fast as it'll go and strategically plan your tracks to allow for punch-outs. Kind-of the nature of the beast, unfortunately.
The glitch is caused by the gap between the erase head and the record head. The faster the tape machine is (or the closer the heads are together), the less of a dropout you'll have. About the only ways around this are to run it as fast as it'll go and strategically plan your tracks to allow for punch-outs. Kind-of the nature of the beast, unfortunately.
insert witty comment here...
thanks for the really prompt reply, my friend. this thing sounds great. really good. using a ramsa board (20 channel 8 bus) and basic mics. shit, using some cheap-ass mics, too...those superlux eco-88's are a ton better than sm 58's and only cost $10-20 used.
so, with this punch in/out problem, why do i not have the problem punching in? only punching out there is a gap.
so, with this punch in/out problem, why do i not have the problem punching in? only punching out there is a gap.
- woodhenge
- pushin' record
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 11:28 am
- Location: Hangin' with Jake and Elwood @Bob's Country Bunker, Indiana
When you punch in on an analog recorder, there is a natural "crossfade" between your old and new take due to the same gap between heads. (The record head starts recording to a spot that the erase head hasn't erased yet.)
Generally, I always tried to track to the end of the tune if I had to punch in (eg. a busy guitar part or drums, etc...) unless there were natural spaces in the part being played. I did that for so long that I still tend to operate that way on a DAW... course of habit, I guess!
The good news is that if you follow this m.o., you can always punch in if a mistake happens later on as you roll. All part of the fun!
Generally, I always tried to track to the end of the tune if I had to punch in (eg. a busy guitar part or drums, etc...) unless there were natural spaces in the part being played. I did that for so long that I still tend to operate that way on a DAW... course of habit, I guess!
The good news is that if you follow this m.o., you can always punch in if a mistake happens later on as you roll. All part of the fun!
insert witty comment here...
-
- gimme a little kick & snare
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:37 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 3:55 pm
- Location: philly
- Contact:
-
- pluggin' in mics
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:19 pm
- Location: Atlanta
+1 I miss my old MS16 too
As far as the punch outs I never heard much of an issue once the entire mix was going. Vox were the toughest though.
Great sounding recorder though. What I miss most about the old MS 16 is if a channel become flaky you could pull the card and blow on it (like the old Nintendo games) reinsert and you were back in business.
As far as the punch outs I never heard much of an issue once the entire mix was going. Vox were the toughest though.
Great sounding recorder though. What I miss most about the old MS 16 is if a channel become flaky you could pull the card and blow on it (like the old Nintendo games) reinsert and you were back in business.
-
- pluggin' in mics
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:19 pm
- Location: Atlanta
I gotta say the Otari MTR 90's sure have attractive prices right now. One sold here locally a few weeks ago without remote for $1,200. I have seen clean examples for as little as $2,500 including the remote.woodhenge wrote:That's it... My wife is gonna kill me, but I'm gonna buy another analog deck on ebay!
- woodhenge
- pushin' record
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 11:28 am
- Location: Hangin' with Jake and Elwood @Bob's Country Bunker, Indiana
I saw both a Sony and MCI 24-tracks on ebay this morning... very tempting! Of course, then I'd have to find a nice vintage console to go with it... and add on a new wing to my studio just to put it all in. I'm sure she'd LOVE that!
But, I really miss the smell of fresh tape in the morning!
But, I really miss the smell of fresh tape in the morning!
insert witty comment here...
- woodhenge
- pushin' record
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 11:28 am
- Location: Hangin' with Jake and Elwood @Bob's Country Bunker, Indiana
I think you'd be better off hitting stop, but there STILL will be a gap. What's erased is erased. Changing the direction of the deck while recording won't change this fact, but it may have other serious repercussions!Zygomorph wrote:I've heard that it can help somewhat to press the Reverse button instead of Stop, as this *may* stop the tape (from moving over the erase head) faster.
insert witty comment here...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 57 guests