Granddad's old wire recorder
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 12:30 pm
- Location: El Paso, TX
Granddad's old wire recorder
So I've been recruited (not that I resisted) to archive my late grandfather's old wire recordings and entrusted with his old Webster Chicago Model 181 wire recorder. Thought all you TOMB folks might find it fun to see the thing and hear a bit about the process. Here is the beast:
There's some serious corrosion on the knobs (the knobs are supposed to be red) and the nuts of their underlying switches, but as some of the switches seem from the schematic to be rather specific, I'm hoping I can get away with just a thorough cleaning. The knobs may get replaced, if I can find a good replacement without just buying another one of these things. So far I've done a smoke test and confirmed that it powers up and does not smoke (although the first time I switched it on the motors puffed out some dust that scared me). The bailer (the head itself moves up and down to ensure that the wire spools well) works just fine, so now it was time to play something. I spooled up a wire and listened to about 30 seconds, which was long enough to determine that everything works, but that the volume knob has a loose wire or something going on as it crackles and cuts out if you turn or tap the knob, so it looks like I will have to open it up and fix. While I'm at it, I'll probably replace the proprietary output jack with a 1/4" one. Looking at the schematic, it's just a standard unbalanced connection. It has 2 mics, so I think I'll cut the connector off one to make an XLR pigtail so I can run other mics and line level signals into the input instead of just being able to use the supplied crystal mics, although that's something for after the archiving is completed. Looking at the schematic, it seems like I can use the same numbering system they use for their schematic and connect pin 3 on their connector to pin 3 of the XLR and so on... am I right on this or am I missing something? Looking at some other tube mic pres, this seems to be correct. Schematic:
Sorry for the bunch of pictures, but the thing is just so cool looking!
There's some serious corrosion on the knobs (the knobs are supposed to be red) and the nuts of their underlying switches, but as some of the switches seem from the schematic to be rather specific, I'm hoping I can get away with just a thorough cleaning. The knobs may get replaced, if I can find a good replacement without just buying another one of these things. So far I've done a smoke test and confirmed that it powers up and does not smoke (although the first time I switched it on the motors puffed out some dust that scared me). The bailer (the head itself moves up and down to ensure that the wire spools well) works just fine, so now it was time to play something. I spooled up a wire and listened to about 30 seconds, which was long enough to determine that everything works, but that the volume knob has a loose wire or something going on as it crackles and cuts out if you turn or tap the knob, so it looks like I will have to open it up and fix. While I'm at it, I'll probably replace the proprietary output jack with a 1/4" one. Looking at the schematic, it's just a standard unbalanced connection. It has 2 mics, so I think I'll cut the connector off one to make an XLR pigtail so I can run other mics and line level signals into the input instead of just being able to use the supplied crystal mics, although that's something for after the archiving is completed. Looking at the schematic, it seems like I can use the same numbering system they use for their schematic and connect pin 3 on their connector to pin 3 of the XLR and so on... am I right on this or am I missing something? Looking at some other tube mic pres, this seems to be correct. Schematic:
Sorry for the bunch of pictures, but the thing is just so cool looking!
---
ross ingram
[brainville]
ross ingram
[brainville]
- Dakota
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:14 am
- Location: West of Boston
- Contact:
Re: Granddad's old wire recorder
No need at all to be sorry - the pictures are great fun! I bet other tapeoppers will agree. Good luck with that. I love archaic technology.signorMars wrote:Sorry for the bunch of pictures, but the thing is just so cool looking!
- calaverasgrandes
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
- Location: Oakland
- Contact:
-
- gimme a little kick & snare
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 12:35 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
Re: Granddad's old wire recorder
It looks like pin 3 of the input actually bypasses the first gain stage, and pin 2 utilizes it. so it's not a balanced input like an xlr. maybe depending on what is plugged in to the jack, the designers wanted to be able to rout different types of things to different parts of the circuit? you could tell by the jack on the mic you have, are all three pins connected? it's hard to suss what those ganged rotary switches do from the schematic, but it looks like there are settings for record, playback, and maybe hi/lo gain?signorMars wrote: Looking at the schematic, it seems like I can use the same numbering system they use for their schematic and connect pin 3 on their connector to pin 3 of the XLR and so on...
I have a similar wire recorder that a friend gave me years ago, I never used it because I have no wire spools to go with it. this post has inspired me to try using it as a mic pre... it will probably need to be modded to do that, but could be worth it.
-David
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
I have one as well, and it's pretty cool. Actually sounds pretty nice as well. Two issues mine has:
1) the motor speed is not constant unless I hold my finger on the lever.
2) the record head is not powerful enough to completely erase previous material. While this would be great for Les Paul-type sound on sound recordings, for other applications it means I can only record over a section of wire once. And since the wire spools that came with the machine are pretty much full with a previous owner's stuff...I don't use it much. I guess I need a tape degausser to bulk-erase my wire spools.
1) the motor speed is not constant unless I hold my finger on the lever.
2) the record head is not powerful enough to completely erase previous material. While this would be great for Les Paul-type sound on sound recordings, for other applications it means I can only record over a section of wire once. And since the wire spools that came with the machine are pretty much full with a previous owner's stuff...I don't use it much. I guess I need a tape degausser to bulk-erase my wire spools.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 12:30 pm
- Location: El Paso, TX
Find and replace the cap feeding the record head immediately, if you ever hope to record with this thing. DC leakage is known to take out the record head in these things.
I have one that also takes several passes to achieve acceptable erasure of previous material.
I have one that also takes several passes to achieve acceptable erasure of previous material.
Doug Williams
ElectroMagnetic Radiation Recorders
Tape Op issue 73
ElectroMagnetic Radiation Recorders
Tape Op issue 73
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 12:30 pm
- Location: El Paso, TX
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests