Patchbays
Everyone is different. My rig is shrinking but this is what I did before:
I had one big rack of stuff--pres, comps, other processors, plus an interface for my computer.
I bought a 8 point XLR patch pay so I could plug mics directly into my pres without going around to the back of the rack.
I bought a 48 point TRS patch bay for everything else. For almost everything, I preferred half-normalled. Basically, you run things together in the order that you use them the most. Those should be your defaults, and then the beauty of the patch bay idea is that you can change that. My default was to run straight into my interface from my pres, so I half normalled my pres to the inputs of my interface. But that was only four channels. So I normalled the outs of a compressor and an effects unit to the other 4 ins of my interface, so that I could, for instance, take a bass part coming through a pre, compress the hell out of it, and record a clean and compressed tone at the same time on two separate channels.
If I had to do it again and was acquiring cables and the whole thing, I'd go with TT instead of TRS just for the space advantage.
Good luck. I'm sure there are chapters on this in some of the home recording books at the library. You wouldn't even need a new or up to date one.
I had one big rack of stuff--pres, comps, other processors, plus an interface for my computer.
I bought a 8 point XLR patch pay so I could plug mics directly into my pres without going around to the back of the rack.
I bought a 48 point TRS patch bay for everything else. For almost everything, I preferred half-normalled. Basically, you run things together in the order that you use them the most. Those should be your defaults, and then the beauty of the patch bay idea is that you can change that. My default was to run straight into my interface from my pres, so I half normalled my pres to the inputs of my interface. But that was only four channels. So I normalled the outs of a compressor and an effects unit to the other 4 ins of my interface, so that I could, for instance, take a bass part coming through a pre, compress the hell out of it, and record a clean and compressed tone at the same time on two separate channels.
If I had to do it again and was acquiring cables and the whole thing, I'd go with TT instead of TRS just for the space advantage.
Good luck. I'm sure there are chapters on this in some of the home recording books at the library. You wouldn't even need a new or up to date one.
-
- TapeOp Admin
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 11:50 am
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
There was a patchbay article in issue #29.
Larry Crane, Editor/Founder Tape Op Magazine
please visit www.tapeop.com for contact information
(do not send private messages via this board!)
www.larry-crane.com
please visit www.tapeop.com for contact information
(do not send private messages via this board!)
www.larry-crane.com
I always go back to this thread when I'm thinking about smart patchbay layouts. the included .xls file is helpful to look at as well.
Um Hopefully you can solder.
Make mults and use them.
Not everything has to be on the bay
MrPatchbay rules http://home.flash.net/~motodata/patchbays/
1/4 tends to be more cost effective than tt but space may be at a premium .
Make sure your not degrading your sound with some super budget bay,
your better off not having a patch bay if it makes things sound bad.
just my 6 cents.
Make mults and use them.
Not everything has to be on the bay
MrPatchbay rules http://home.flash.net/~motodata/patchbays/
1/4 tends to be more cost effective than tt but space may be at a premium .
Make sure your not degrading your sound with some super budget bay,
your better off not having a patch bay if it makes things sound bad.
just my 6 cents.
- LazarusLong
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:55 pm
- Location: the cobwebs of your mind
7 bits of advice for only 6 cents. You, sir, are a bargain.bluesbaz wrote:Um Hopefully you can solder.
Make mults and use them.
Not everything has to be on the bay
MrPatchbay rules http://home.flash.net/~motodata/patchbays/
1/4 tends to be more cost effective than tt but space may be at a premium .
Make sure your not degrading your sound with some super budget bay,
your better off not having a patch bay if it makes things sound bad.
just my 6 cents.
not but seriously, it's great advice. Switchcraft makes some simple and friendly patchbays that are solder free, sound good and are easily swapped between the various normals. They aren't cheap, but they're extremely well built. To me, it's well worth the money versus the hassle extraordinaire that patchbays can be.
http://www.sweetwater.com/c958--Switchcraft--Patchbays
The truth of a proposition has nothing to do with its credibility. And vice versa.
-
- ass engineer
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:49 am
Here's what I was going to do based on what I have in terms of ins/outs... The only piece of outboard gear I have right not is a FMR RNC... everything else will come in time and I'll expand the bay as needed..
thoughts?
http://www.springloadmusic.com/Space/patchbay.pdf
thoughts?
http://www.springloadmusic.com/Space/patchbay.pdf
- ott0bot
- dead but not forgotten
- Posts: 2023
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:54 pm
- Location: Downtown Phoenix
Great advice so far.
After biting the bullet a while back I find that life without a patchbay was much more complicated. It's worth the investment for sure. If you want to keep it simple here is what I use:
http://www.redco.com/shopexd.asp?id=638
The old standard 1/4" neutrik bays. I have 2 and still have room for expansion. I have a 20 unit rack at home with a couple empty spots, but all in all I have 6 compressers, 5 pre amps, a spring reverb unit and a head phone amp all hooked up to the bay along with my 003r. I have the outputs of my pre's normalling into the interface so there is no need to patch to get a signal into the DAW. If you don't have any external pre amps yet, you'll probably just be using the RNC for mixing and so it should be really simple.
Invest in some decent cable snakes and keep the cables as short as you can. Make sure you use unbalanced connections for the RNC or you'll be using the input as an insert, as most patchbays are balanced.
Obviously if you can learn to solder and set up a TT bay you'll be ready for serious expansion, but if you plan on keeping a simple home set up with 10-15 pieces of gear the 1/4" bays will serve you well.
After biting the bullet a while back I find that life without a patchbay was much more complicated. It's worth the investment for sure. If you want to keep it simple here is what I use:
http://www.redco.com/shopexd.asp?id=638
The old standard 1/4" neutrik bays. I have 2 and still have room for expansion. I have a 20 unit rack at home with a couple empty spots, but all in all I have 6 compressers, 5 pre amps, a spring reverb unit and a head phone amp all hooked up to the bay along with my 003r. I have the outputs of my pre's normalling into the interface so there is no need to patch to get a signal into the DAW. If you don't have any external pre amps yet, you'll probably just be using the RNC for mixing and so it should be really simple.
Invest in some decent cable snakes and keep the cables as short as you can. Make sure you use unbalanced connections for the RNC or you'll be using the input as an insert, as most patchbays are balanced.
Obviously if you can learn to solder and set up a TT bay you'll be ready for serious expansion, but if you plan on keeping a simple home set up with 10-15 pieces of gear the 1/4" bays will serve you well.
Which issue was it reprinted in? I didn't see it in any of the last few issues...Jewish Guitar Hero wrote:And it is conveniently reprinted in the current issueTapeOpLarry wrote:There was a patchbay article in issue #29.
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep"...
--Scott Adams
--Scott Adams
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 119 guests