Mackie mixer opinions please
-
- ass engineer
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:49 am
Mackie mixer opinions please
I'm after a mixing desk and I've got the option of acquiring a Mackie 32:8 for a good price, but I don't know much about the model.
Can anyone give me any advice or opinions about this model?
Thanks
Can anyone give me any advice or opinions about this model?
Thanks
- Dakota
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:14 am
- Location: West of Boston
- Contact:
Depends on what you want a mixer to do for you. If it's lots of routing and utility, a mackie like that will definitely do it for you for reasonable money. If you want a mixer to contribute a layer of euphonious analog timbre and EQ, it won't. Potentially somewhat neutral if gain staged carefully, brittle if pushed.
-
- ass engineer
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:49 am
- losthighway
- resurrected
- Posts: 2351
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:02 pm
- Contact:
You might give a look at some of the newer Soundcraft models, I believe Spirit is their current studio series. They have some smaller boards that have gotten very good reviews.
To go above that quality/price point (the $800-$1,300) you make a very sudden leap into Toft and Neotek and you easily double or triple or quadruple the price (and the quality (?)).
To go above that quality/price point (the $800-$1,300) you make a very sudden leap into Toft and Neotek and you easily double or triple or quadruple the price (and the quality (?)).
- LazarusLong
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:55 pm
- Location: the cobwebs of your mind
- Brett Siler
- moves faders with mind
- Posts: 2518
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 12:16 pm
- Location: Evansville, IN
- Contact:
I heard the Onyx a big step up from their old boards. I wouldn't say their old boards are bad, if used correctly, but you can preobably find something that sounds cooler for around the same price like a Soundcraft 200B or a Soundtracs Topaz.
I learned some of my recording knowledge on an older Mackie 32X8 at school, and the recordings still hold up after 8 years, so I'm not gonna knock it.
I learned some of my recording knowledge on an older Mackie 32X8 at school, and the recordings still hold up after 8 years, so I'm not gonna knock it.
My musical endeavors!
My Music: http://www.brettsiler.bandcamp.com/
StudioMother Brain Sound Infrastructure
My Music: http://www.brettsiler.bandcamp.com/
StudioMother Brain Sound Infrastructure
- calaverasgrandes
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
- Location: Oakland
- Contact:
I tried and tried to make use of my mackie boards over the years. There was this kind of zeitgeist in the 90's that Mackie boards sounded good, or at least neutral. In hindsight they were just better than peavey.
I would MUCH rather have a soundcraft or Allen and Heath anything over a Mackie. Maybe the Onyx is good but the marketing speak on that mixer is revolting.
Also the 8 buss series of mackies are known to have a ribbon seating problem. I dont recall the details but its a known issue for a good number of them.
As far as brittle, I think the later Mackies suffered from the brittle sound factor more than the earlier versions. the last mackie I had was a 1604, the first model that had sweep eq, and it wasnt brittle at all, in fact you had to kind of hit it hard to get it to open up at all. It generally was fairly dark sounding.
another mixer to look into are the old Ashly 8 channel rack mixers, they have parametric EQ I believe and decent preamps. pretty small too.
I would MUCH rather have a soundcraft or Allen and Heath anything over a Mackie. Maybe the Onyx is good but the marketing speak on that mixer is revolting.
Also the 8 buss series of mackies are known to have a ribbon seating problem. I dont recall the details but its a known issue for a good number of them.
As far as brittle, I think the later Mackies suffered from the brittle sound factor more than the earlier versions. the last mackie I had was a 1604, the first model that had sweep eq, and it wasnt brittle at all, in fact you had to kind of hit it hard to get it to open up at all. It generally was fairly dark sounding.
another mixer to look into are the old Ashly 8 channel rack mixers, they have parametric EQ I believe and decent preamps. pretty small too.
??????? wrote: "everything sounds best right before it blows up."
I had a Mackie 16.8 for quite a while and still to this day it's my favorite board as far a the routing, layout and overall functionality. That thing can do just about anything, for everything I ever did the design of that was perfect. I especially loved the meter bridge (though you can get it without). It definately didn't sound bad but it also didn't ad a ton of awesomeness or charactor either. It just functioned extremely well for me, I miss it sometimes. We're using a Toft now, and while that board is an extreme step up in terms of sound and build quality, I feel it's kind of lacking in routing functionality. The monitor section of each channel works a bit goofy to me, and I really miss having the MixB from the Mackie.
Personally, I don't think it will hurt your sound at all, unless you're running some really nice mics into it in which case it might not quite let those shine as much as they could.
Personally, I don't think it will hurt your sound at all, unless you're running some really nice mics into it in which case it might not quite let those shine as much as they could.
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5572
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
Re: Mackie mixer opinions please
I've used them plenty over the years, until I bought my Allen & Heath GL2800-32.Jewish Guitar Hero wrote:I'm after a mixing desk and I've got the option of acquiring a Mackie 32:8 for a good price, but I don't know much about the model.
Can anyone give me any advice or opinions about this model?
Thanks
They are good mixers, and if you can get one that works well for cheap, go for it.
You could do worse...
Examples of big groups using Mackie 32*8 for misc duties:
Early Madonna, her first record.
Early Billy Idol, his first two records.
Depeche Mode (they still own one in on of their home studios)
A bunch of other bands that used it when it came out originally... take your pick.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- calaverasgrandes
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
- Location: Oakland
- Contact:
Re: Mackie mixer opinions please
fact check please?noeqplease wrote:
Examples of big groups using Mackie 32*8 for misc duties:
Early Madonna, her first record.
Early Billy Idol, his first two records.
Depeche Mode (they still own one in on of their home studios)
I dont think Mackie was even in business yet in 1982 and 1984 when Billy Idols first two albums came out.
or for madonna's record in 1983.
Maybe, they were using tapco, or one of the early mackie LM series mixers?
I checked the Mackie site for info on when they started but could find none. IIRC they started in the early 90's.
??????? wrote: "everything sounds best right before it blows up."
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:45 pm
- Location: Sunny Tucson
Re: Mackie mixer opinions please
Wow, the folks who recorded Billy Idol's and Madonna's early records must've had a time machine, because I remember first hearing "White Wedding" and "Into the Groove" when I was still in high school in the early 80s, and the Mackie company didn't exist until the early 90s.noeqplease wrote:I've used them plenty over the years, until I bought my Allen & Heath GL2800-32.Jewish Guitar Hero wrote:I'm after a mixing desk and I've got the option of acquiring a Mackie 32:8 for a good price, but I don't know much about the model.
Can anyone give me any advice or opinions about this model?
Thanks
They are good mixers, and if you can get one that works well for cheap, go for it.
You could do worse...
Examples of big groups using Mackie 32*8 for misc duties:
Early Madonna, her first record.
Early Billy Idol, his first two records.
Depeche Mode (they still own one in on of their home studios)
A bunch of other bands that used it when it came out originally... take your pick.
Cheers
-a
"On the internet, nobody can hear you mix a band."
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5572
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
Re: Mackie mixer opinions please
The producers said Mackie... but you're right it could be an earlier incarnation of board. Remember Greg has been around long before his company started, making all kinds of stuff for clients. It was not called Mackie until the 90's, when Greg decided to put it all under one "roof" so to speak.calaverasgrandes wrote:fact check please?noeqplease wrote:
Examples of big groups using Mackie 32*8 for misc duties:
Early Madonna, her first record.
Early Billy Idol, his first two records.
Depeche Mode (they still own one in on of their home studios)
I dont think Mackie was even in business yet in 1982 and 1984 when Billy Idols first two albums came out.
or for madonna's record in 1983.
Maybe, they were using tapco, or one of the early mackie LM series mixers?
I checked the Mackie site for info on when they started but could find none. IIRC they started in the early 90's.
At least I know Billy Idol's producer and I asked him, plus it was in an interview from him somewhere in some mag... Keith Forsey -from his mouth to my ears. Maybe it was a later record, but Keith kept talking about "Rebel Yell"... it has been a long time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Forsey
The other producer, Madonnas' was the guitarist of Chic : Nile Rodgers. "Like a virgin" was the album. I'm sure they used one in pre-production.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
If you are interested in details about Mackie preamps, the subject came up on the Ampex list two months ago. I can't quote any of that due to the copyright limitations of posts on the list, but you could look it up on the archive. Look for discussion of November 7, 2009.
To paraphrase, one common issue of both earlier and later Mackie preamps is that, because of size and cost constraints, they all show a LF response varying with the setting of the gain trim control (the corner frequency rises with increasing gain levels). The size and cost of the needed capacitor to flatten that response is not viable in a compact, low-cost mixer.
Having said that, I find the preamps on my old CR-1604 are still usable if treated right, though they are a tad dark. However, these days, I don't use those preamps much. If I could update, I'd probably go for the later version, like an Onyx, but that would mainly be for the more versatile EQ.
Cheers,
Otto
To paraphrase, one common issue of both earlier and later Mackie preamps is that, because of size and cost constraints, they all show a LF response varying with the setting of the gain trim control (the corner frequency rises with increasing gain levels). The size and cost of the needed capacitor to flatten that response is not viable in a compact, low-cost mixer.
Having said that, I find the preamps on my old CR-1604 are still usable if treated right, though they are a tad dark. However, these days, I don't use those preamps much. If I could update, I'd probably go for the later version, like an Onyx, but that would mainly be for the more versatile EQ.
Cheers,
Otto
Daddy-O Daddy-O Baby
- Sean Sullivan
- moves faders with mind
- Posts: 2555
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:24 pm
- Location: Nashville
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 129 guests