Violating the "Bass in Center of Mix" rule

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

User avatar
trodden
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5698
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 8:21 am
Location: C-attle
Contact:

Post by trodden » Mon May 31, 2010 7:25 pm

standup wrote:Funny, I always run it up the middle. Vaguely I have the idea that we need to let the two speakers share the work. But really, vinyl is pretty much gone and I should probably rethink/get over it.... Interesting thought.
oh oh.. its far from gone. But don't let the format limit your ideas!

standup
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 722
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Post by standup » Mon May 31, 2010 7:33 pm

I know vinyl is not gone or anything, but nothing I've ever messed with has gone to vinyl, I don't think. I'm in my 40s and have hundreds of LPs from early 80's on, yeah and some 50s jazz and misc. 78s. I adore the round thing with a groove in it. But I'm not recording music for that medium, ya know?

doctari
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 8:47 am
Location: Mobile,Al.

Post by doctari » Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:47 pm

The white album has very good examples of bass panned to one side helps the bass stand out and display the cool tones. I now want a nice jazz bass.

Kel
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:03 pm

Post by Kel » Wed Jun 09, 2010 4:29 am

I've found slightly panning the bass slightly left or right sounds kind of cool. It also helps both the bass and kick stand out more with its own distinctive space. Course when going to school I generally kept it center or hard panned. Have been experimenting lately though.

User avatar
casey campbell
buyin' a studio
Posts: 927
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:21 am
Location: hammond, louisiana

Post by casey campbell » Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:22 pm

panning the kick just a hair one way, and panning the bass just a little the other sure does give alot of separation between the two, and can really save a mix.

User avatar
Peterson Goodwyn
pushin' record
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:00 pm
Location: West Philly
Contact:

Post by Peterson Goodwyn » Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:31 am

Does not Andy Wallace use a subtle phaser on the bass to spread it out around the center? Think I read this in a Sound on Sound interview once.

Seems like a cool idea, but kind of strange since I've never heard a bass that I thought sounded "too localized." Usually the opposite.

das
audio school
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: californiialand
Contact:

Post by das » Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:12 pm

thanks for the explanation.



inasilentway wrote:Vinyl aside, the reason for bass to be in the center is the same reason that an SVT is 300 watts: those low frequencies require more power. So the thinking goes that rather than have the left speaker working twice as hard as the right, put it down the center and have both speakers working together to get the same amount of fullness with more headroom. (as was mentioned earlier, bass frequencies tend towards the omnidirectional anyway, hence the headroom taking priority over stereo positioning) It's not a hard and fast rule, rather a fact that is sometimes useful and sometimes not.

User avatar
thebunker
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:00 am
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Contact:

Post by thebunker » Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:03 am

Another great example of hard panning are those Miles Davis Quintet records (Miles Smiles, ESP etc) from the 60's with Herbie Hancock, Wayne Shorter, Ron Carter and Tony Williams. I can't remember exactly the pan scheme but the drums were definitely on one side maybe with trumpet, bass on the other with piano...i'd have to go back and check though. This works so well with jazz as the upright bass doesn't have much going on in the lows on these records, and there's some bleed as the band was playing in the same room.

User avatar
gustavobill
audio school graduate
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:12 pm
Location: Bras?lia, Brazil
Contact:

Post by gustavobill » Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:57 am

On his book, Geoff Emerick says that the pans on the Beatles albums were kinda ramdom. The stereo wasn't so common on people houses so he invested more time doing the mix in mono. When the mono mix was done he just juggled around the pans knobs, not really worrying about it.

it's very bizarre to hear that a stereo image you are so familiar (and became a reference for so many people) was just "juggled around"
I wanna see you try that with a $25 preamp

your forth album must be DOUBLE LIVE (via the Foghat Rule)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests