I was commenting how inanimate objects cannot be professional, only the player. The original point I was trying to make had little to do with technicalities like, "in this arena the word professional used to describe _____ is ok." The point was, as far as music goes it is a damn shame that professional is used to describe gear.
dick sidechainey wrote:Look at the contents of my previous posts. I'm sure you'll find that you understand my pointpixeltarian wrote:
look professional up in the dictionary. I'm sure you'll find you're just talking about marketing that is so archaic that no one thinks of it as marketing anymore.
"Pro line" is generally how reed/brass players refer to horns above a certain price point. At times, we'll get lazy and contract that into "pro". This is universally accepted nomenclature. The point you were making is that the word "pro" or "professional" isn't used in conjunction with high-end equipment. This is incorrect:
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/navigation?q=student+sax
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/navigati ... ediate+sax
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/navigati ... sional+sax
Also implied in your post is that gear that has the word "pro" associated with it isn't good gear. As far as reeds and brass, this is also incorrect, unless you can tell me how a $7000 Selmer Firebird is a piece of crap.
Why aren't you and subatomic as hung up on the definitions of "student" and "intermediate?" Some kid's horn isn't the student. And I'm not even sure how to look at intermediate axes from a pedant's point of view.
And here's the kicker - the alto I own is from Selmer's pro line, but my tenor is from the intermediate line. And I played a gig last Friday on tenor, AND GOT PAID! Oh noes! Don't tell Meriam Webster!