PT9 - let's replace our Digi 002's with something bitchin!
- digitaldrummer
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3566
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:51 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Contact:
PT9 - let's replace our Digi 002's with something bitchin!
ok, maybe not... but you probably saw that Pro Tools 9 is out and if you own a Digi 002 or 002r (like me) then you were probably thinking the same... what bitchin interface could I (affordably) replace my digi with so that I get a better clock, better converters, more inputs/outputs and maybe other cool stuff? If it doesn't exist, then maybe someone will read this thread and build it for us.
I know for myself I'd like at least two headphone outputs (like the 003) and I'd also really like two sets of monitor ouputs - I sometimes run a sub so it would be nice if that second set was switchable. I also need ADAT for my other 8 pres -- unless there is a groovy interface that already has 16 or more line inputs (then I could sell my RME ADI too I guess) that would be really cool. I sometimes use the 4 builtin pres but I could live w/o them. I do need at least one S/PDIF in/out - two might be nice. Two ADATs might be nice. Word clock in/out would be good to have just in case. MIDI is nice, but I have a USB/MIDI too. Firewire input is probably best, although its aging so maybe someone is going to USB3?
A couple I looked at quickly... The RME fireface 800, the Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56, or Pro 40?, Mackie Onyx ??, steinberg mr816csx, and I purposefully left off the Black Lion Audio because if I'm going to go spend more $$ then I was hoping maybe there is something off the shelf with support, warranty, etc that might be as good (or close) and costs less.
What else out there is viable? Or is there anything? What would you do?
I know for myself I'd like at least two headphone outputs (like the 003) and I'd also really like two sets of monitor ouputs - I sometimes run a sub so it would be nice if that second set was switchable. I also need ADAT for my other 8 pres -- unless there is a groovy interface that already has 16 or more line inputs (then I could sell my RME ADI too I guess) that would be really cool. I sometimes use the 4 builtin pres but I could live w/o them. I do need at least one S/PDIF in/out - two might be nice. Two ADATs might be nice. Word clock in/out would be good to have just in case. MIDI is nice, but I have a USB/MIDI too. Firewire input is probably best, although its aging so maybe someone is going to USB3?
A couple I looked at quickly... The RME fireface 800, the Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56, or Pro 40?, Mackie Onyx ??, steinberg mr816csx, and I purposefully left off the Black Lion Audio because if I'm going to go spend more $$ then I was hoping maybe there is something off the shelf with support, warranty, etc that might be as good (or close) and costs less.
What else out there is viable? Or is there anything? What would you do?
Last edited by digitaldrummer on Tue Nov 09, 2010 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- kingmetal
- buyin' gear
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:10 am
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Contact:
I've got the Saffire 56 and it's awesome.
Little Ship Studios
--------------------
Little Ship is proud to announce Bill Wild's EP Phone Number
--------------------
Little Ship is proud to announce Bill Wild's EP Phone Number
-
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 5:07 pm
- Location: Dead Center, Bible Belt, USA
Hi, I'm starting to look for a win 7 interface. I've been running a RME Hammerfall 9652 since they first came out over here. It's been great, but now the company refuses to write 64 bit drivers for it. Their logic on their forum is that we've gotten years of use out of them, and that now it's time to buy again. That really pisses me off. I've said a lot of good things about them in forums over the years, but no longer. There's no reason I should throw away a card I paid around $500 for back in the day. They have locked the discussions and threaten to remove any new discussions about it. I'll not buy again from a company with that attitude, I'm just funny that way. I'm looking at the Focusrite 56, now, but it will be a while into next year before I do anything, though the extra 4 gigs of DDR3 2000 (OC) ram I have on hand is screaming at me to go in with it's buddies
-
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:55 am
- Location: Austin, Tx
- Contact:
I have been thinking about this exact same thing all day every day since getting back from AES. I actually have the option of researching and hearing how other interfaces' mic pres, converters and word clocks compare with the 003's and 002's because we're finally free to use any ASIO or Core Audio compatible interface with Pro Tools? Holy shit-balls batman!
but seriously, if anyone has any 1st hand experience of comparing an 002r or 003r to interfaces like the saffire 56 or rme fireface stuff or anything else especially if knowledgeable about how their word clocks and converters compare, please.... do tell.
the best option might be to just buy and try and return the shit.
but seriously, if anyone has any 1st hand experience of comparing an 002r or 003r to interfaces like the saffire 56 or rme fireface stuff or anything else especially if knowledgeable about how their word clocks and converters compare, please.... do tell.
the best option might be to just buy and try and return the shit.
- digitaldrummer
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3566
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:51 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Contact:
- jnTracks
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 6:49 am
- Location: seacost of NH USA
- Contact:
what about adding a second interface, rather than replacing?
i'm thinking it would be cheap to add a really nice card with 2 or 4 balanced inputs and still have my 002r for full bands. since i can't afford an all new 18ch interface right now. then just rack up more pre's as i can afford them.
am i thinking wrong?
i'm thinking it would be cheap to add a really nice card with 2 or 4 balanced inputs and still have my 002r for full bands. since i can't afford an all new 18ch interface right now. then just rack up more pre's as i can afford them.
am i thinking wrong?
-Justin Newton
railroadavenuerecording.com what i like to do
railroadavenuerecording.com what i like to do
- gregovertone
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:36 am
me too.Sculli wrote:My BLA modded 002 is working just fine. A RME or Apogee could be in my future. It's nice to have a choice now.
Peace,
Kevin
i love it!
www.gregsguitarlessons.com
Guitar Lessons & Studio
Guitar Lessons & Studio
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5593
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
I think it's wonderful.
PT is so easy to use, compared with all the other DAWs out there.
This will really change the DAW game for a lot of people.
I like their ability to print scores... without having to correct them endlessly like in Logic.
And being able to run this with better converters is definitely great.
Cheers
PT is so easy to use, compared with all the other DAWs out there.
This will really change the DAW game for a lot of people.
I like their ability to print scores... without having to correct them endlessly like in Logic.
And being able to run this with better converters is definitely great.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- digitaldrummer
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3566
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:51 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Contact:
so does ASIO (or PT9) allow you to have multiple interfaces simultaneously? I have a digi 002r and I have an mbox2, so I like the idea of being able to move the iLok to the laptop and go mobile...
however, could I use two or three different firewire interfaces together? that may solve another issue I have with the 002 - since I'm using the ADAT to go to my RME converter, I'm limited to 44.1 or 48Khz sessions. Occiasionally I get a request for 96KHz. so it would be nice if I could use something like a mbox and then a couple of Rosetta 800's or if I hit the lottery, a pair of Prism Orpheus connected by firewire...
however, could I use two or three different firewire interfaces together? that may solve another issue I have with the 002 - since I'm using the ADAT to go to my RME converter, I'm limited to 44.1 or 48Khz sessions. Occiasionally I get a request for 96KHz. so it would be nice if I could use something like a mbox and then a couple of Rosetta 800's or if I hit the lottery, a pair of Prism Orpheus connected by firewire...
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5593
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
According to what I read, you can use any combination of hardware (aggregate device support in Apple OS) up to 32 channels of input and 32 channels of output.digitaldrummer wrote:so does ASIO (or PT9) allow you to have multiple interfaces simultaneously? I have a digi 002r and I have an mbox2, so I like the idea of being able to move the iLok to the laptop and go mobile...
however, could I use two or three different firewire interfaces together? that may solve another issue I have with the 002 - since I'm using the ADAT to go to my RME converter, I'm limited to 44.1 or 48Khz sessions. Occiasionally I get a request for 96KHz. so it would be nice if I could use something like a mbox and then a couple of Rosetta 800's or if I hit the lottery, a pair of Prism Orpheus connected by firewire...
So, it seems as though that is the case. I cannot speak for the PC users though.
One thing I do appreciate about my HD 192 IO is the digital card lightpipe IO, which does automatic conversion from any format to any higher format, for all 8 channels. So I can plug in a 48kHz max sample rate interface to that and use it to record 8 channels into a 96 kHz session. Nifty feature.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- digitaldrummer
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3566
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:51 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Contact:
I've never tried that on the 002r, but it may do the same... but an up-convert is still not the same as true sampling at 96Khz or 192Khz.noeqplease wrote:One thing I do appreciate about my HD 192 IO is the digital card lightpipe IO, which does automatic conversion from any format to any higher format, for all 8 channels. So I can plug in a 48kHz max sample rate interface to that and use it to record 8 channels into a 96 kHz session.
Cheers
I am enjoying the "freedom" of having new options - even if I never use them.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests