favorite mic pre distortion

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

andris
gettin' sounds
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:57 pm
Location: oneonta, n.y.
Contact:

favorite mic pre distortion

Post by andris » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:30 am

Just wondering which mic pre's you've found have the most pleasing distortion when overdriven.
dryhill studios
oneonta ny

User avatar
Nick Sevilla
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5574
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
Contact:

Re: favorite mic pre distortion

Post by Nick Sevilla » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:33 am

andris wrote:Just wondering which mic pre's you've found have the most pleasing distortion when overdriven.
Neve 1073.

Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.

User avatar
Peterson Goodwyn
pushin' record
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:00 pm
Location: West Philly
Contact:

Post by Peterson Goodwyn » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:40 am

Hamptone JFET
I like to build the stuff that I record with.
www.diyrecordingequipment.com

ashcat_lt
tinnitus
Posts: 1094
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Duluth, MN
Contact:

Post by ashcat_lt » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:53 am

Tascam 1642.

I think that's the model #. An old mixer. The pres and EQs and just about everything about it just sounded like an electric guitar!

mjau
speech impediment
Posts: 4030
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Orlando
Contact:

Post by mjau » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:56 am

Altec 1589.

andris
gettin' sounds
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:57 pm
Location: oneonta, n.y.
Contact:

Post by andris » Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:23 pm

Thanks for the replies. When the pre only has a gain knob do you use a passive attenuator or console line input to bring down the output so that is doesn't clip digitally?
dryhill studios
oneonta ny

User avatar
ott0bot
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2023
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Downtown Phoenix

Post by ott0bot » Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:46 pm

andris wrote:Thanks for the replies. When the pre only has a gain knob do you use a passive attenuator or console line input to bring down the output so that is doesn't clip digitally?
That'll work. The passive attenuator will usually be the best way to retain the signal from your preamp without eccess coloration. A console line input can be run through a number of different gain stages, op amps or transformers and can alter sound pretty drastically at times. But try both and compare.

Preamps with a gain and and output or trim know definately make it easier to distort.

Me personally I've been liking my PM1000 channel strip on drum and guitar mics and a UA 710 for di'd fuzz bass and vox. Also, I've been using the Summit Audio 2ba-221's line inputs for additional break up and tube saturation. Nice and mushy without losing too much of the frequency range of a signal.

I also like the pushing the Tascam 424 mic pre's, and distorting the heck of of drums and track it to a cassette, then transfer digitally at a resonable level.

nobody, really
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 157
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:08 pm
Location: where the sidewalk ends

Post by nobody, really » Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:23 pm

scully 280

i've heard people say good things about ramsa pres when pushed, but i haven't found anything yet that i like that on. i think they're great otherwise.

User avatar
losthighway
resurrected
Posts: 2351
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:02 pm
Contact:

Post by losthighway » Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:59 pm

Chandler Germanium

RefD
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5993
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 9:10 pm

Post by RefD » Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:41 pm

Tascam Porta 03.

very trashoid, bordering on fuzz.

LOVE.
?What need is there to weep over parts of life? The whole of it calls for tears.? -- Seneca

User avatar
Nick Sevilla
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5574
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
Contact:

Post by Nick Sevilla » Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:00 pm

andris wrote:Thanks for the replies. When the pre only has a gain knob do you use a passive attenuator or console line input to bring down the output so that is doesn't clip digitally?
If I am to really try to get a very specific distortion, then I use a trim before the input.

Usually I've used passive 5K log pot before the input, if the device has no output gain knob.

Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.

AndyHutchinson
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:35 pm
Location: Port Washington, NY, USA

Post by AndyHutchinson » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:38 pm

The short answer is the Daking Mic Pre One. It has an amazing 3rd order FET distortion, although the caveat is that we use it, at work, with a Telefunken RFT bottle from the 30's-40's.? Anyway, the combo has the most amazing distortion. Regardless of the mic choice, I really like the sound of the Daking overdriven. It doesn't work on everything, but it sounds great on guitars, overheads if mic'ed with ribbons, etc.

User avatar
calaverasgrandes
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3233
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: Oakland
Contact:

Post by calaverasgrandes » Sat Jan 08, 2011 7:19 am

Yamaha PM180, though you pretty much need a high output condenser to make it buzz.
Summit 2ba221 as well, but I actually like its clean sound more.
The old Radio Shack Realistic Mixer. The one with two VU meters and the faders. It doesn't have proper mic ins, just mic level 1/4" jacks. But it gets this great fuzz when hit hard.
I used to have an old Wollensak reel to reel as well that suited this purpose. Though it also had a 1/4" mic jack and the output was speaker level so I had to DI out and lowz-hiz in.
TOA AV mixers also, white noisy.
Ramsa? I really dont get what folks are on about with those. I had a WRS series for years. Great feature set. Inserts on everything. Swept mids, switchable high and low shelving. Nice metering. Muddy as hell, it was mixers like this that made the 1604 seem awesome when it came out. I tried clipping hte pre before. For instance when I wanted a snare to sound exploded, or for the vocal. Poop.
Great for live sound production though. No RFI or EMI, easy to patch dynamics anyplace you need to. Metering! Big as hell, no squinting to see which knob you are on.
??????? wrote: "everything sounds best right before it blows up."

User avatar
T-rex
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2197
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 5:44 am
Location: Louisville KY

Post by T-rex » Sat Jan 08, 2011 9:23 am

losthighway wrote:Chandler Germanium
+1

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Post by joel hamilton » Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:26 am

Those Dakings do rip up really nicely.

My personal favorite, if we are talking distortion and not just killer saturation like the way a 1073 or 31102 or 33114 neve will do, but full blown drive would be the MANLEY VTL tube "mono reference" mic preamp. That is the only tube pre I own that makes the transition from clean to drive in a perfect logarithmic taper. Absolutely stunning, even without other devices in the chain. Variable feedback (like the chandler germ, only 12 years earlier) is really apparent on a tube pre because it affects the rise time so much.

The EH 12AY7 will do a good approximation of this type of thing if you have a crazy hot mic that is putting out a ton of level. I have even chained one 12AY7 into another and it really sounds incredible that way, without as much noise as I had assumed would come out the other end of a cascading gain setup like that.

The drive I get from my 33114's in my console can be really pleasing, because the discrete AB amps (BA438 and 440) in those modules transition to saturation really well without any "snap" or nasty cat sneeze...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 162 guests