How to print labels onto Cassettes?
How to print labels onto Cassettes?
Hey all,
So I'm starting a tiny record label, focused on putting out super limited runs of tapes for friends bands, my bands, and anything else that catches my ear. I already bought a tape duplicator, a pile of tapes, cases, etc. I was just curious as to how I could print labels directly onto the tapes themselves. As much as I like the idea of hand-writing and labeling each tape, I think being able to print details on the tapes would be a little more professional. I'm not really interested in any kind of adhesive or sticker type label. I know it can be done, and for a relatively low cost (In The Pocket Tapes offers it for runs as low as 100) I'm just not sure how or where to look for information. Thanks y'all!
-m
So I'm starting a tiny record label, focused on putting out super limited runs of tapes for friends bands, my bands, and anything else that catches my ear. I already bought a tape duplicator, a pile of tapes, cases, etc. I was just curious as to how I could print labels directly onto the tapes themselves. As much as I like the idea of hand-writing and labeling each tape, I think being able to print details on the tapes would be a little more professional. I'm not really interested in any kind of adhesive or sticker type label. I know it can be done, and for a relatively low cost (In The Pocket Tapes offers it for runs as low as 100) I'm just not sure how or where to look for information. Thanks y'all!
-m
- Gregg Juke
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:35 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
- Contact:
That's good E-Money. That's rich...
But seriously, on-shell printing is more expensive and seems like a waste of your hard-eraned cash (_if_ you can find that time-machine to find someone that will do it for you).
I'd go with the labels. You might want to contact someone who used to do hundreds and hundreds and thousands of cassettes a year, back when people, um, had cassette players.
I'm not sure if they still have any stock or do anything with that stuff, but you could try Mark Records/Mark Custom Recording:
www.markcustom.com
GJ
But seriously, on-shell printing is more expensive and seems like a waste of your hard-eraned cash (_if_ you can find that time-machine to find someone that will do it for you).
I'd go with the labels. You might want to contact someone who used to do hundreds and hundreds and thousands of cassettes a year, back when people, um, had cassette players.
I'm not sure if they still have any stock or do anything with that stuff, but you could try Mark Records/Mark Custom Recording:
www.markcustom.com
GJ
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
MKlein, contact Sound/Video Impressions in Des Plaines, IL. They did onshell printing onto cassette tapes when I worked there in the early '90s, and I spoke to them last year and they said they still do it. They also probably still do binloop replication, so you don't have to dub the tapes yourself. I don't know how limited your runs are, but we used to do 50-100 tape runs for smaller clients IIRC.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
Well, good question...I know there are cassette-only labels out there. For kitsch value, I'd guess.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
For those wondering "why tape?", here's where I'm coming from.
Last year a friend and I started a label with the intention of putting out 7" records. It's common knowledge that vinyl sales, while a minuscule percentage of music sales, have been steadily rising in the last few years. It's my opinion that, as the digital music becomes more and prevalent, the physical medium matters less and less for playback purposes. People listen to iPods when they're not at home, and laptops when they are. Even cars today are shipping with MP3 player compatibility. When people buy a CD these days, more often than not it gets burnt into itunes, and thrown up on a shelf for the rest of its life.
Anyway, we put out one 7" record in a run of 500, spent a pile (all) of our money on custom packaging, artwork, and so on. The record sold moderately well, but the costs of vinyl are so prohibitory that we couldn't afford to finance our next release, so we closed shop.
I chose tape for my next label endeavor because I can control all aspects of production, from the duplication, labeling, packaging, and so forth. I can press small runs of releases (100-200 copies) at a low cost, which enables me to put out a lot more music without worrying about having to recoup.
I'm of the opinion that people will be more willing to shell out $5 for a limited, kitschy tape than a burnt CD-r. I'll be including mp3 downloads with each release, so really, the difference is negligable anyway.
Thats my 2 cents.
Last year a friend and I started a label with the intention of putting out 7" records. It's common knowledge that vinyl sales, while a minuscule percentage of music sales, have been steadily rising in the last few years. It's my opinion that, as the digital music becomes more and prevalent, the physical medium matters less and less for playback purposes. People listen to iPods when they're not at home, and laptops when they are. Even cars today are shipping with MP3 player compatibility. When people buy a CD these days, more often than not it gets burnt into itunes, and thrown up on a shelf for the rest of its life.
Anyway, we put out one 7" record in a run of 500, spent a pile (all) of our money on custom packaging, artwork, and so on. The record sold moderately well, but the costs of vinyl are so prohibitory that we couldn't afford to finance our next release, so we closed shop.
I chose tape for my next label endeavor because I can control all aspects of production, from the duplication, labeling, packaging, and so forth. I can press small runs of releases (100-200 copies) at a low cost, which enables me to put out a lot more music without worrying about having to recoup.
I'm of the opinion that people will be more willing to shell out $5 for a limited, kitschy tape than a burnt CD-r. I'll be including mp3 downloads with each release, so really, the difference is negligable anyway.
Thats my 2 cents.
- ott0bot
- dead but not forgotten
- Posts: 2023
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:54 pm
- Location: Downtown Phoenix
It's fun and cheap...so why not? Do what you enjoy, I say. There is a local label in town that does this and I think there is enough people with tape decks that will enjoy this stuff. I still have a dual tape deck in my stereo set up, and occasionally I'll throw something on there.
Something you may consider is printing on clear address labels, then after printing spraying them with a clear coat to keep the ink from smearing.
I think Avery makes some that will work:
http://www.avery.com look at address labels, then filter for clear and find a size that'll work.
Something you may consider is printing on clear address labels, then after printing spraying them with a clear coat to keep the ink from smearing.
I think Avery makes some that will work:
http://www.avery.com look at address labels, then filter for clear and find a size that'll work.
-
- gimme a little kick & snare
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:56 pm
Tapes are alive and well
I think there is still is good population of folks who listen to tapes. It is fun and cheap. No need to knock the cassette tape format. I don't know anything else that can sit in a puddle of old coffee under my truck seat for 5 years and still play well! For labeling sometimes I just use a stencil and paint....ott0bot wrote:It's fun and cheap...so why not? Do what you enjoy, I say. There is a local label in town that does this and I think there is enough people with tape decks that will enjoy this stuff. I still have a dual tape deck in my stereo set up, and occasionally I'll throw something on there.
Something you may consider is printing on clear address labels, then after printing spraying them with a clear coat to keep the ink from smearing.
I think Avery makes some that will work:
http://www.avery.com look at address labels, then filter for clear and find a size that'll work.
-
- alignin' 24-trk
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 12:50 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
- Contact:
Another old punk-rock era trick was to get a $5 stamp made, and use an ink that dries on the shells you're using. Might take some experimentation, but some kind of acrylic might work.
It'll look a little sloppy, but isn't that the idea? Something handmade, to add value and 'touch'?
If you're going for kitsch, why not go all the way back and do 8-track tapes? Or glue the cassettes into old cassette players from Goodwill?
I mean, if people are getting mp3's, there's no reason to limit yourself to something that can be played back, even.
I've thought that a more effective label would be a t-shirt label. The t-shirt has the band name, album cover, track list, and includes a tag with the download code. Could be sold at shows, and when the fan downloads the music, they're given the chance to sign up for the mailing list. People will pay for a t-shirt that looks cool, and if it includes a download of the record (which should be sold for $5-$10 without the shirt) it's an incentive that's hard to resist!
It'll look a little sloppy, but isn't that the idea? Something handmade, to add value and 'touch'?
If you're going for kitsch, why not go all the way back and do 8-track tapes? Or glue the cassettes into old cassette players from Goodwill?
I mean, if people are getting mp3's, there's no reason to limit yourself to something that can be played back, even.
I've thought that a more effective label would be a t-shirt label. The t-shirt has the band name, album cover, track list, and includes a tag with the download code. Could be sold at shows, and when the fan downloads the music, they're given the chance to sign up for the mailing list. People will pay for a t-shirt that looks cool, and if it includes a download of the record (which should be sold for $5-$10 without the shirt) it's an incentive that's hard to resist!
- austin
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:47 pm
- Location: Baltimore
- Contact:
I put out a record a few months ago on cassette+digital for largely the same reasons: It was super-cheap to do a very small cassette run (50 copies), all the production was totally DIY (and fun!), and people seem to like it, partially for the nostalgia factor I guess. (I had a couple people tell me they bought the cassette copy rather than just the digital because they thought it was cool, even though they have no tape player.) As you say, everyone gets a digital copy either way.Mklein wrote: I chose tape for my next label endeavor because I can control all aspects of production, from the duplication, labeling, packaging, and so forth. I can press small runs of releases (100-200 copies) at a low cost, which enables me to put out a lot more music without worrying about having to recoup.
I'm of the opinion that people will be more willing to shell out $5 for a limited, kitschy tape than a burnt CD-r. I'll be including mp3 downloads with each release, so really, the difference is negligable anyway.
There are many tape-only record labels in existence right now who appear to be doing a fine business, albeit in limited quantities.
As for printing on the cassettes: I did stencils and acrylic paint -- but all that's on mine is "1" and "2" to denote the sides. No small type with song titles, etc.
I really like the idea of having the download code on a t-shirt. People love buying t-shirts not so much CDs.JohnSuitcase wrote:Another old punk-rock era trick was to get a $5 stamp made, and use an ink that dries on the shells you're using. Might take some experimentation, but some kind of acrylic might work.
It'll look a little sloppy, but isn't that the idea? Something handmade, to add value and 'touch'?
If you're going for kitsch, why not go all the way back and do 8-track tapes? Or glue the cassettes into old cassette players from Goodwill?
I mean, if people are getting mp3's, there's no reason to limit yourself to something that can be played back, even.
I've thought that a more effective label would be a t-shirt label. The t-shirt has the band name, album cover, track list, and includes a tag with the download code. Could be sold at shows, and when the fan downloads the music, they're given the chance to sign up for the mailing list. People will pay for a t-shirt that looks cool, and if it includes a download of the record (which should be sold for $5-$10 without the shirt) it's an incentive that's hard to resist!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: bluesman and 120 guests