I want to start cassette recording, what should I get?
- BrontoSoreAss
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:14 pm
- Location: Toronto
Okay, So as I've said previously, the 424 seems like the best unit for me with my budget, but which model do I ideally want to get? I saw that some the later models had stereo inputs, so then could I hook up my mx-80 to it and have 8 mics running to the stereo track? Would that be good for recording drums? Also, I need some good recommendations for mics, I currently have 2 junky dynamic mics we're using with our P.A. for practice, & I got an MXL R144 ribbon mic that a friend sold to me on the cheap.
Thanks for all the help!
Alec
Thanks for all the help!
Alec
A heads-up for cassette supplies tape.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We used one cassette per song ( especially with the transport of the 238)
We ordered 10-15 minute tapes ---- ( assuming you are recording 4-7 minute productions ) a lot less wear on those drives in the cassette machines.... longer tapes really do push the maintenance requirements for those capstans/belts .....and the stretching of tape.
We find it much easier to keep things organized ::: with just one song ,,,per tape~!!
We ordered 10-15 minute tapes ---- ( assuming you are recording 4-7 minute productions ) a lot less wear on those drives in the cassette machines.... longer tapes really do push the maintenance requirements for those capstans/belts .....and the stretching of tape.
We find it much easier to keep things organized ::: with just one song ,,,per tape~!!
Last edited by cjogo on Sun Mar 13, 2011 3:33 pm, edited 3 times in total.
whatever happened to ~ just push record......
Try www.tapes.com: they have bulk high bias C-60 tapes available.
-
- pluggin' in mics
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 1:28 pm
- Location: US of A
Gotta start somewhere...
I gotta second the 688 on this one. I used it for years. Good sound, 20 inputs (via a "dual" channel, not including the aux inputs), and a very effective (but a little hard to learn) digital patch bay. Not to mention a full meter bridge, great monitoring options, the list goes on. Oh, and the most important part - 8 channels on tape. (20 something after bouncing)
I got mine used for $250 years back. The record "women in technology" by whitetown was done on a 688. you might remember the hit "your woman" in the 90s.
I gotta second the 688 on this one. I used it for years. Good sound, 20 inputs (via a "dual" channel, not including the aux inputs), and a very effective (but a little hard to learn) digital patch bay. Not to mention a full meter bridge, great monitoring options, the list goes on. Oh, and the most important part - 8 channels on tape. (20 something after bouncing)
I got mine used for $250 years back. The record "women in technology" by whitetown was done on a 688. you might remember the hit "your woman" in the 90s.
I know I'm digging back up an old post, that never really went anywhere, But though a friend I was able to contact someone who had a Tascam 644 for $100 in great condition, but the seller also had a 388 for $250, but the fast forward doesn't currently work on it. I have around $300, and a lot of bands I like use the 388, Yet I don't know how much it would cost to fix it, and I know tapes are super expensive. Which would you guys buy?
Thanks,
Alec
Thanks,
Alec
-
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:47 am
- Location: New Mexico
The 388 you mention could be a good purchase. The no FF repair may not be costly. If you can find a decent Tascam tech where you live, the 388 might be a better choice.tweak wrote:I know I'm digging back up an old post, that never really went anywhere, But though a friend I was able to contact someone who had a Tascam 644 for $100 in great condition, but the seller also had a 388 for $250, but the fast forward doesn't currently work on it. I have around $300, and a lot of bands I like use the 388, Yet I don't know how much it would cost to fix it, and I know tapes are super expensive. Which would you guys buy?
Thanks,
Alec
- shedshrine
- deaf.
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:47 pm
- Location: sf bay area
well, here's a start towards your edification:tweak wrote:Well, I live in Chicago, so Deltronics in the city maybe? Where would I get tape for it, and if I did get it, how would I go about getting it onto a cd? (I'm an idiot with this stuff)
manual:
the snowfields tascam 388 manual
thanks snowfields!
Tape for the 388 is relatively affordable.
You can find RMGI tape for the 388 at Full Compass:
http://www.fullcompass.com/product/344596.html
If you don't like computers, find a CD recorder to mix down to.
You can find RMGI tape for the 388 at Full Compass:
http://www.fullcompass.com/product/344596.html
If you don't like computers, find a CD recorder to mix down to.
-
- buyin' a studio
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 2:50 pm
- Location: Laveen, AZ
- Contact:
I've been really enjoying a porta 03 mk ii recently. it seems to have traded away some of the 02's routing for noise reduction, which i'm not sure i like, but making straight 4 track recordings with limited ability to punch in is great after years of following the computer down the mouse hole.
i think if you're just starting, you should consider a simple four track with no frills. record drums mono, each instrument to one track, and take a lot of time to get it right...
i think if you're just starting, you should consider a simple four track with no frills. record drums mono, each instrument to one track, and take a lot of time to get it right...
- shedshrine
- deaf.
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:47 pm
- Location: sf bay area
eh91311 wrote:tweak wrote:how much better would the sound quality on the 388 be compared to the 644?
The main thing that the 388 has over cassette portastudios is dynamic range and punch. Recordings have a muted 3-D thing going on rather than the flat smeary cassette multitrack sound with no real lows or bright highs. Modern computer soundcards are far more accurate, but lack the 388's "vibe".
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: bluesman and 132 guests