Mic splitter Y cord

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
Bob Simpson
audio school
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:18 am

Mic splitter Y cord

Post by Bob Simpson » Thu Mar 24, 2011 11:02 am

I need to split my drummer's headset mic to a separate channel on the recorder and our FOH board.

Will a XLR Y cord work, or will the impedance get wierd and foobar the track?

I'm short of cash to do an iso splitter.

Any suggestions?

TIA

Bob Simpson

User avatar
Scodiddly
genitals didn't survive the freeze
Posts: 3984
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 6:38 am
Location: Mundelein, IL, USA
Contact:

Post by Scodiddly » Thu Mar 24, 2011 11:33 am

A simple XLR Y-cable will work 99.99% of the time. Go for it.

User avatar
IanWalker
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:43 pm
Location: Lansing, MI

Post by IanWalker » Thu Mar 24, 2011 8:57 pm

Scodiddly wrote:A simple XLR Y-cable will work 99.99% of the time. Go for it.
Yup, unless you need to run phantom from one of the split ends. You can get some crap then, and might get some phantom running back down the other side of the y.

Or at least that's the idea. There's a reason they make splitter boxes with direct and isolated outputs.

But if its a dynamic (or if you're splitting after some kind of preamp)? Go for it.
--
Ian!
http://michigansoundservices.com/

Drivar dohaeris. Drivar morghulis. (All drives must serve. All drives must die. Basically, back up your data.)

User avatar
Scodiddly
genitals didn't survive the freeze
Posts: 3984
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 6:38 am
Location: Mundelein, IL, USA
Contact:

Post by Scodiddly » Fri Mar 25, 2011 10:59 am

It will work 91.34% of the time with phantom involved.

User avatar
IanWalker
gimme a little kick & snare
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 5:43 pm
Location: Lansing, MI

Post by IanWalker » Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:01 am

Scodiddly wrote:It will work 91.34% of the time with phantom involved.
Its good to know the exact percentage of the time that it will. Science!
--
Ian!
http://michigansoundservices.com/

Drivar dohaeris. Drivar morghulis. (All drives must serve. All drives must die. Basically, back up your data.)

Bob Simpson
audio school
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:18 am

Post by Bob Simpson » Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:13 pm

IanWalker wrote:
Scodiddly wrote:It will work 91.34% of the time with phantom involved.
Its good to know the exact percentage of the time that it will. Science!
Thanks, Folks...

Seems like I remember 93.675% of all statistics are made up on the spot... :D

Bob Simpson

Andy Peters
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 602
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:45 pm
Location: Sunny Tucson

Post by Andy Peters » Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:35 pm

IanWalker wrote:
Scodiddly wrote:A simple XLR Y-cable will work 99.99% of the time. Go for it.
Yup, unless you need to run phantom from one of the split ends. You can get some crap then, and might get some phantom running back down the other side of the y.
Doesn't matter, unless the other input on the split cannot stand off the 48 V phantom (which will actually be lower than 48 V because of the load presented by the mic), in which case the other piece of kit is crap and needs to be replaced.

Certainly the DC bias from the phantom will be seen at the other input, but in a properly-designed system it'll be blocked by either caps or a transformer.

And there's no need to worry about phantom active on both split ends since the 6.81k resistors do a fine job of isolating the voltage sources.

-a
"On the internet, nobody can hear you mix a band."

Bob Simpson
audio school
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:18 am

Post by Bob Simpson » Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:30 pm

Andy Peters wrote:
IanWalker wrote:
Scodiddly wrote:A simple XLR Y-cable will work 99.99% of the time. Go for it.
Yup, unless you need to run phantom from one of the split ends. You can get some crap then, and might get some phantom running back down the other side of the y.
Doesn't matter, unless the other input on the split cannot stand off the 48 V phantom (which will actually be lower than 48 V because of the load presented by the mic), in which case the other piece of kit is crap and needs to be replaced.

Certainly the DC bias from the phantom will be seen at the other input, but in a properly-designed system it'll be blocked by either caps or a transformer.

And there's no need to worry about phantom active on both split ends since the 6.81k resistors do a fine job of isolating the voltage sources.

-a
Where do the 6.81k resistors go? :roll:
I was just planning to parallel the conductors...

Bob

Nate Dort
tinnitus
Posts: 1039
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: Detroit
Contact:

Post by Nate Dort » Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:54 pm

Bob Simpson wrote:
Where do the 6.81k resistors go? :roll:
I was just planning to parallel the conductors...

Bob
they're in the mic pre. conventional phantom power design requires a 6.81k resistor in line with each signal pin. nothing you have to worry about with your splitter cable.

Bob Simpson
audio school
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:18 am

Post by Bob Simpson » Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:02 pm

Whew!

Thanks, Nate.

I knew I should put resistors in for a combiner, but didn't think I needed them in a splitter.

Bob Simpson

User avatar
dix
audio school graduate
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:54 am
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Post by dix » Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:20 pm

I have a Rapco signal-combiner, but I now have a need for a splitter. Would gender-reversing the inputs and outputs on the combiner be the same as using a splitter? ?i will need phantom to go to the mic.

Thanks!

User avatar
vvv
zen recordist
Posts: 10170
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 8:08 am
Location: Chi
Contact:

Post by vvv » Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:05 pm

But mebbe make sure his headset mic's not a ribbon ...

... or not.

:twisted:
bandcamp;
blog.
I mix with olive juice.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 146 guests