Better than SM58 for vocals but not too sensitive?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Fencible
audio school
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:34 pm

Better than SM58 for vocals but not too sensitive?

Post by Fencible » Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:11 am

Can you recommend a vocal mic that will capture more of the subtleties and detail of a voice without being so sensitive they pick up too much background noise in my less than perfectly soundproofed studio?

Putting it another way, are great vocal mics only about extreme sensitivity?
If not what else should I look for in a vocal mic?

Scott Greenberg
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:16 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by Scott Greenberg » Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:17 am

You might want to consider some kind of acoustic treatments in your "studio". Even if its just hanging some curtains or blankets to absorb some of the outside sound.

Then I think you'll have a lot more options for mics, and can probably get more usable results from sensitive/condenser mics.

OR

if you completely ignore the first half of my comment, there are lots of other dynamic mics I record with (RE20, M88 etc) That are going to be less sensitive and may get you good results.
I'd like to change your mind by hitting it with a rock.

-TMBG

kslight
mixes from purgatory
Posts: 2970
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:40 pm

Post by kslight » Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:19 am

SM7

User avatar
@?,*???&?
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5804
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Just left on the FM dial
Contact:

Re: Better than SM58 for vocals but not too sensitive?

Post by @?,*???&? » Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:34 am

Fencible wrote:Can you recommend a vocal mic that will capture more of the subtleties and detail of a voice without being so sensitive they pick up too much background noise in my less than perfectly soundproofed studio?

Putting it another way, are great vocal mics only about extreme sensitivity?
If not what else should I look for in a vocal mic?
Pick up a Supercardioid or Hypercardioid pick-up pattern mic. Cuts down ambient noise by 8% over what a lone cardioid allows for. If an Omni mic allows 100% ambient sensitivity, then cardioid allows 33% and hyper/super allow around 25%. These figures are from Shure Microphones.

Another caveat to keep in mind is that the sphere of sensitivity is around 20' for a condenser mic and around 5' for a dynamic. Therefore, your super or hypercardioid mic should be a dynamic.

chris harris
speech impediment
Posts: 4270
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
Location: Norman, OK
Contact:

Post by chris harris » Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:37 am

kslight wrote:SM7

User avatar
@?,*???&?
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5804
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Just left on the FM dial
Contact:

Post by @?,*???&? » Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:39 am

subatomic pieces wrote:
kslight wrote:SM7
Still a cardioid with 33% ambient leakage.

User avatar
fossiltooth
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1734
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Contact:

Post by fossiltooth » Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:51 am

@?,*???&? wrote:
subatomic pieces wrote:
kslight wrote:SM7
Still a cardioid with 33% ambient leakage.
Still an ideal choice for this poster.

As I'm typing this, I'm sitting 5 feet from a singer who's doing a live vocal take in the CR. I can promise you it'd be totally useable if we wanted to keep this one.

User avatar
Recycled_Brains
resurrected
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:58 pm
Location: Albany, NY
Contact:

Post by Recycled_Brains » Fri Apr 08, 2011 1:44 pm

subatomic pieces wrote:
kslight wrote:SM7
or 441.
Ryan Slowey
Albany, NY

http://maggotbrainny.bandcamp.com

kayagum
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:11 pm
Location: Saint Paul, MN

Post by kayagum » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:25 pm

Maybe Heil PR40 or PR30?

+1 on SM7

User avatar
ott0bot
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2023
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Downtown Phoenix

Post by ott0bot » Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:03 pm

sm7 is good, but you if you don't project your voice enough...they can really sound dull to me. Just my experience.

I'd opt for an electrovoice re11, re15 or even a re20. With the lack of proximity effect you can put on a windscreen and get fairly close without getting too boomy. The 11 or 15 will have a tighter pattern but re20 is a bit more sensitive so you can use a bit less gain and get a solid signal. All the mics have a nice and clean sound with decent midrange and character. Then you can eq and compress to taste after tracking. Avoid compression to tape so you get less room sound.

That sennheiser 441 would be boss for this too!

Also...using a low cut on the mic or preamp can help get more midrange and high frequencies through with less room sound. If you don't have money for real acoustic treatment, put up blankets on reflective surfaces and sing out of a corner not into it so you can have less early reflections. Keeping the mic out of the space directly between the ceiling and floor can keep standing waves minimalized as well.

Fencible
audio school
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:34 pm

Thanks all

Post by Fencible » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:38 pm

Note my room does not have reflective sound problems, only external sound penetration bothers me a little. ie sound damping is OK but sound proofing less than perfect.

Some great suggestions to check out. I appreciate it and will certainly try the ones I can afford.

User avatar
Snarl 12/8
cryogenically thawing
Posts: 3510
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:01 pm
Location: Right Cheer
Contact:

Post by Snarl 12/8 » Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:03 pm

ott0bot wrote:Keeping the mic out of the space directly between the ceiling and floor can keep standing waves minimalized as well.
How is this possible in an indoor environment?
Carl Keil

Almost forgot: Please steal my drum tracks. and more.

Producer/Engineer
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 197
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: USA

Re: Better than SM58 for vocals but not too sensitive?

Post by Producer/Engineer » Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:26 pm

Fencible wrote:Can you recommend a vocal mic that will capture more of the subtleties and detail of a voice without being so sensitive they pick up too much background noise in my less than perfectly soundproofed studio?
YES I CAN. The Telefunken M80 Dynamic Microphone.

http://www.telefunken-elektroakustik.co ... 4&cat=mics

User avatar
Scodiddly
genitals didn't survive the freeze
Posts: 3974
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 6:38 am
Location: Mundelein, IL, USA
Contact:

Re: Better than SM58 for vocals but not too sensitive?

Post by Scodiddly » Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:51 pm

@?,*???&? wrote:Another caveat to keep in mind is that the sphere of sensitivity is around 20' for a condenser mic and around 5' for a dynamic. Therefore, your super or hypercardioid mic should be a dynamic.
Assuming gain settings for equal output, no difference in "depth of pickup" between condensor and dynamic.


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests