Better than SM58 for vocals but not too sensitive?
Better than SM58 for vocals but not too sensitive?
Can you recommend a vocal mic that will capture more of the subtleties and detail of a voice without being so sensitive they pick up too much background noise in my less than perfectly soundproofed studio?
Putting it another way, are great vocal mics only about extreme sensitivity?
If not what else should I look for in a vocal mic?
Putting it another way, are great vocal mics only about extreme sensitivity?
If not what else should I look for in a vocal mic?
-
- pluggin' in mics
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:16 am
- Location: New York
- Contact:
You might want to consider some kind of acoustic treatments in your "studio". Even if its just hanging some curtains or blankets to absorb some of the outside sound.
Then I think you'll have a lot more options for mics, and can probably get more usable results from sensitive/condenser mics.
OR
if you completely ignore the first half of my comment, there are lots of other dynamic mics I record with (RE20, M88 etc) That are going to be less sensitive and may get you good results.
Then I think you'll have a lot more options for mics, and can probably get more usable results from sensitive/condenser mics.
OR
if you completely ignore the first half of my comment, there are lots of other dynamic mics I record with (RE20, M88 etc) That are going to be less sensitive and may get you good results.
I'd like to change your mind by hitting it with a rock.
-TMBG
-TMBG
- @?,*???&?
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5804
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:36 pm
- Location: Just left on the FM dial
- Contact:
Re: Better than SM58 for vocals but not too sensitive?
Pick up a Supercardioid or Hypercardioid pick-up pattern mic. Cuts down ambient noise by 8% over what a lone cardioid allows for. If an Omni mic allows 100% ambient sensitivity, then cardioid allows 33% and hyper/super allow around 25%. These figures are from Shure Microphones.Fencible wrote:Can you recommend a vocal mic that will capture more of the subtleties and detail of a voice without being so sensitive they pick up too much background noise in my less than perfectly soundproofed studio?
Putting it another way, are great vocal mics only about extreme sensitivity?
If not what else should I look for in a vocal mic?
Another caveat to keep in mind is that the sphere of sensitivity is around 20' for a condenser mic and around 5' for a dynamic. Therefore, your super or hypercardioid mic should be a dynamic.
-
- speech impediment
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
- Contact:
kslight wrote:SM7
Studio - http://www.hookechosound.com
Label - http://www.wearenicepeople.com
Band - http://www.depthandcurrent.com
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/HoodEchoSound
Label - http://www.wearenicepeople.com
Band - http://www.depthandcurrent.com
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/HoodEchoSound
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Still an ideal choice for this poster.@?,*???&? wrote:Still a cardioid with 33% ambient leakage.subatomic pieces wrote:kslight wrote:SM7
As I'm typing this, I'm sitting 5 feet from a singer who's doing a live vocal take in the CR. I can promise you it'd be totally useable if we wanted to keep this one.
- Recycled_Brains
- resurrected
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:58 pm
- Location: Albany, NY
- Contact:
- ott0bot
- dead but not forgotten
- Posts: 2023
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:54 pm
- Location: Downtown Phoenix
sm7 is good, but you if you don't project your voice enough...they can really sound dull to me. Just my experience.
I'd opt for an electrovoice re11, re15 or even a re20. With the lack of proximity effect you can put on a windscreen and get fairly close without getting too boomy. The 11 or 15 will have a tighter pattern but re20 is a bit more sensitive so you can use a bit less gain and get a solid signal. All the mics have a nice and clean sound with decent midrange and character. Then you can eq and compress to taste after tracking. Avoid compression to tape so you get less room sound.
That sennheiser 441 would be boss for this too!
Also...using a low cut on the mic or preamp can help get more midrange and high frequencies through with less room sound. If you don't have money for real acoustic treatment, put up blankets on reflective surfaces and sing out of a corner not into it so you can have less early reflections. Keeping the mic out of the space directly between the ceiling and floor can keep standing waves minimalized as well.
I'd opt for an electrovoice re11, re15 or even a re20. With the lack of proximity effect you can put on a windscreen and get fairly close without getting too boomy. The 11 or 15 will have a tighter pattern but re20 is a bit more sensitive so you can use a bit less gain and get a solid signal. All the mics have a nice and clean sound with decent midrange and character. Then you can eq and compress to taste after tracking. Avoid compression to tape so you get less room sound.
That sennheiser 441 would be boss for this too!
Also...using a low cut on the mic or preamp can help get more midrange and high frequencies through with less room sound. If you don't have money for real acoustic treatment, put up blankets on reflective surfaces and sing out of a corner not into it so you can have less early reflections. Keeping the mic out of the space directly between the ceiling and floor can keep standing waves minimalized as well.
Thanks all
Note my room does not have reflective sound problems, only external sound penetration bothers me a little. ie sound damping is OK but sound proofing less than perfect.
Some great suggestions to check out. I appreciate it and will certainly try the ones I can afford.
Some great suggestions to check out. I appreciate it and will certainly try the ones I can afford.
- Snarl 12/8
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3510
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:01 pm
- Location: Right Cheer
- Contact:
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:30 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Better than SM58 for vocals but not too sensitive?
YES I CAN. The Telefunken M80 Dynamic Microphone.Fencible wrote:Can you recommend a vocal mic that will capture more of the subtleties and detail of a voice without being so sensitive they pick up too much background noise in my less than perfectly soundproofed studio?
http://www.telefunken-elektroakustik.co ... 4&cat=mics
- Scodiddly
- genitals didn't survive the freeze
- Posts: 3974
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 6:38 am
- Location: Mundelein, IL, USA
- Contact:
Re: Better than SM58 for vocals but not too sensitive?
Assuming gain settings for equal output, no difference in "depth of pickup" between condensor and dynamic.@?,*???&? wrote:Another caveat to keep in mind is that the sphere of sensitivity is around 20' for a condenser mic and around 5' for a dynamic. Therefore, your super or hypercardioid mic should be a dynamic.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests