414 for voc OK?
414 for voc OK?
Until I stuff the cookie jar enough for something else, the only LDC that I have is an AKG 414. I use it for OH, room, in front of amps, but do any of you guys use actually that for Voc's?
This is a 414 XLS. I think it sounds ok, and the pattern selection is great. I'll send it through a UA 6176 into PT. But I just don't hear a lot about it on voc. So just wondering...
This is a 414 XLS. I think it sounds ok, and the pattern selection is great. I'll send it through a UA 6176 into PT. But I just don't hear a lot about it on voc. So just wondering...
Um excuse me, these headphones aren't working...
- Gregg Juke
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:35 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
- Contact:
It is the best mike that anyone has ever used on my voice (your mileage may vary)... And I have sung/done voice-over through U87's, RCA ribbons, and just about anything else you can think of. When I can afford one for my own studio, that purchase is a definite.
Cardioid through a decent preamp, you should be more than fine. It does clarify/emphasize highs a bit though, so I wouldn't use it if you're going for anything "dark."
GJ
Cardioid through a decent preamp, you should be more than fine. It does clarify/emphasize highs a bit though, so I wouldn't use it if you're going for anything "dark."
GJ
Last edited by Gregg Juke on Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Great! Good to know. I was a bit nervous for some reason. So far for me, an SM7b and 441 were fine, but now I have someone else interested doing vocs, so I was thinking 414, why not?
At the studio I help out in, I have never seen those 414's come out of the locker for vocals because of all those great vintage LDC's available there. On my own, I just have to use what I have.
At the studio I help out in, I have never seen those 414's come out of the locker for vocals because of all those great vintage LDC's available there. On my own, I just have to use what I have.
Um excuse me, these headphones aren't working...
- jgimbel
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:51 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
Not that I think it's some mind-blowing example, but I've heard time and time again that a 414 is generally used for Chris Martin of Coldplay's vocals.
I don't own a 414 but I've used one, and while of course it's not a character mic, I can't see why it wouldn't work well. I've used my 4050 for vocals well, which is another mic known for being pretty clean and natural sounding. Since it presents things pretty much as they are it's not going to attenuate sibilance and I'd expect the same from a 414, but hell, that's the situation with a lot of mics people love for vocals. Go for it, I'd say not only will it work but there's a good chance it'll be really nice!
I don't own a 414 but I've used one, and while of course it's not a character mic, I can't see why it wouldn't work well. I've used my 4050 for vocals well, which is another mic known for being pretty clean and natural sounding. Since it presents things pretty much as they are it's not going to attenuate sibilance and I'd expect the same from a 414, but hell, that's the situation with a lot of mics people love for vocals. Go for it, I'd say not only will it work but there's a good chance it'll be really nice!
My first new personal album in four years - pay what you want - http://jessegimbel.bandcamp.com
-
- speech impediment
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
- Contact:
If it sounds good, it is good. One of the most important parts of audio engineering is developing confidence in your ability to judge what you're hearing. Without that confidence, you'll waste an outrageous amount of time second-guessing yourself.
You don't read a lot about people tracking vocals with a d112. But, I've done it. And, I've gotten some really cool sounds trying things that buck conventional wisdom. Just do what sounds best to you.
BTW, there's really no source that I'd hesitate to record with a 414. Great mics.
You don't read a lot about people tracking vocals with a d112. But, I've done it. And, I've gotten some really cool sounds trying things that buck conventional wisdom. Just do what sounds best to you.
BTW, there's really no source that I'd hesitate to record with a 414. Great mics.
Studio - http://www.hookechosound.com
Label - http://www.wearenicepeople.com
Band - http://www.depthandcurrent.com
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/HoodEchoSound
Label - http://www.wearenicepeople.com
Band - http://www.depthandcurrent.com
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/HoodEchoSound
- jgimbel
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:51 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
Another "not the best example" (for example, not for self promo!), but I did vocals on this song on my last album with a D112 - http://jessegimbel.bandcamp.com/track/night-songchris harris wrote:You don't read a lot about people tracking vocals with a d112. But, I've done it. And, I've gotten some really cool sounds trying things that buck conventional wisdom. Just do what sounds best to you.
And the "effect"-iness is much more from the processing than the mic's sound alone, for whatever reason in that mix the D112 sounded much more natural than the number of other mics I was using normally.
My first new personal album in four years - pay what you want - http://jessegimbel.bandcamp.com
- Jeff White
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3263
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
I totally miss playing this song!jgimbel wrote:...but I did vocals on this song on my last album with a D112 - http://jessegimbel.bandcamp.com/track/night-song.
All of the vocals on the Nightlands debut (Secretly Canadian) were done with my 1993 414 B/ULS: http://nightlands.bandcamp.com/album/forget-the-mantra
If it works for the singer, it works.
On a side note, I feel the same way about the Shure SM7b. Doesn't work all of the time, but when it does it seems to absolutely rule.
Jeff
I record, mix, and master in my Philly-based home studio, the Spacement. https://linktr.ee/ipressrecord
- Gregg Juke
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:35 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
- Contact:
Oops it's an XLII. Not anXLS. sorry, doh!
I broke out the paperwork that came with it. There is a slight bump at 3k then another at 6k. it's supposed to sound like a C12. But I can't compare with an a/b.
Thanks guys, feeling better now. I would hate to have him record then listen back to something not so good.
I broke out the paperwork that came with it. There is a slight bump at 3k then another at 6k. it's supposed to sound like a C12. But I can't compare with an a/b.
Thanks guys, feeling better now. I would hate to have him record then listen back to something not so good.
Um excuse me, these headphones aren't working...
- Jeff White
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3263
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:15 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
The 414 has come in 2 flavors for years. The B/ULS and the TLII (tuned for vocals) were the instrument and vocal versions of this mic in the 1990s. Seems like they have continued this trend with the newer versions of the 414 as well.
Jeff
Jeff
I record, mix, and master in my Philly-based home studio, the Spacement. https://linktr.ee/ipressrecord
Yes that's along the line of what I was thinking. Putting up the wrong mike. But it seems like the 414 will do the job.ipressrecord wrote:The 414 has come in 2 flavors for years. The B/ULS and the TLII (tuned for vocals) were the instrument and vocal versions of this mic in the 1990s. Seems like they have continued this trend with the newer versions of the 414 as well.
Jeff
If you have a big well stocked locker, just put up something else, but for me it's either the 414, SDC, or dynamics. I know some even like the RE 20 for vocal.
Um excuse me, these headphones aren't working...
- digitaldrummer
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3523
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:51 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 69 guests