Help me choose an appropriate reverb unit

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

telepathy
pushin' record
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 2:07 am
Location: Somerville, MA
Contact:

Post by telepathy » Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:09 pm

substitute wrote:
you need the Demeter spring reverb.
I forgot about those! Does it get boingy on drums?
well, not boingy, but a little splashy. more so than digital would, but only with heavy drums.

percussion is the only arena where it reveals itself to be a spring. having said that, it's not nearly as gritty or "spring-like" as other spring reverbs, pretty much ever. I have many springs (I love 'em), including the Furman, the Spacexpander, tube tanks, and more, and the Demeter is really nothing like the others in most circumstances. it'll boing if you really crush the hell out of it with drums, but otherwise it's incredible. if you just want a little snare verb, or to put some air around handclaps or hand percussion, it's amazing, and not boingy. super silky & lush on voices and acoustic instruments, too. mine gets more use on vocals than anything else. it is the background vocal KING.

put it this way: if I had a plate - already having the Demeter, the other springs, & chamber reverb - I'd never have to worry about reverb again.
get up with it

User avatar
calaverasgrandes
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3233
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: Oakland
Contact:

Post by calaverasgrandes » Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:55 pm

I've been reading some horror stories on the TC Electronic mid to low range units having dodgy power supplies. Though the silver lining on that is that you might be able to buy a "broken" $2000 TC reverb for cheap and fix it?
I'm looking for a verb too.
I think my crappy synth playing would sound way better with a big old reverb.
??????? wrote: "everything sounds best right before it blows up."

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:58 pm

Two reverbs I kind of never hope to be without again are the Sony R7 and the Klark Teknik DN-780. I have multiple units of both of these in case one breaks down. Both can be had for under $1k.

The 780 gets used on almost every session I do. Literally. It's such a terrific and wonderfully-under-rated reverb. It's simple to program and will do really nice natural room sounds in addition to some great artificial reverbs. I can get to almost anything I need REALLY quickly from the front panel controls. In fact, I mixed some stuff today and used both the non-linear verb and the 200ms delay. The #18 and #19 rooms are some of my favorites.

The R7 is totally great in a completely different way. It has some nice natural verbs, too, although it's definitely got a '90s Japanese digital grit to it. In smaller amounts, it can be perfect for adding a tiny bit of almost undetectable ambience, but the bigger, washier stuff is almost out of hand. It's got some really great goofier effects, too, including some nice modulations and delays.

I agree that the SPX990 is probably the best of the Yamaha units. If you're a fan of the mid 80s records done by Don Gehman, for example, than the Yamaha REV7 can be had for like NO BREAD these days and it's a very cool reverb. The #22 snare verb on that thing is an extremely recognizable sound. The SPX90II has some of the same verbs and is also a very handy box.

I always liked Lexicon verbs, too, although they have an extremely distinct sound. I'm a big fan of the LXP-1s, which I assume you can probably still get fairly cheap, but I think they're difficult to repair if I'm not mistaken. The PMC60s are still great, as are the old Model 200s. As for slightly more modern bang for the buck, I think the MPX-1 is a great addition to the line, with a separate, dedicated chip for the reverb sounds and another for the delays and modulation effects. It's kind of a pain in the ass to program, but it's got some really useful stuff in it.

I've used the TC M2000 and M3000 and they're cool, but they just don't so it for me. There's something totally unexciting about them, although I've certainly heard some GREAT records made with those things, including anything that Tony (drumsound) has used them on. He has those things totally figured out and I know a lot of great engineers who really like them.

I LOVE H3000s and the "New House" or "Empty House" or whatever it's called is a stellar verb, but like Tony, I almost never use those things for reverb. There's so much other stuff that they do well that I usually find myself saving those for something other than verb duties.

I used a Bricasti last summer at Wellspring Sound in Massachusetts and I TOTALLY fell in love, but I've not yet shelled out the dough for one. I'd also love to have a stereo EMT plate at Old House, but that hasn't happened yet, either.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

substitute
pushin' record
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 8:28 am

Post by substitute » Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:18 am

There's a few DN-780's on ebay all around $1500, but with nobody bidding on them.
And the Sonys seem to be going for around $300, which seems like a good deal.

I'm picking up that reverb is not going to be a one and done thing, so LOTS of great pieces to look out for.

After that review I'm definitely going to look for a demeter, seems like that and a digital piece would cover a lot of ground.

awesome

top_ape
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 7:39 pm

Post by top_ape » Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:01 am

Have you considered something other than a digital unit? Do you have a spare room you might be able to set up as a chamber? How about a DIY plate?

They both have their downsides, notably space and ambient noise issues. However the upside is they'll likely sound far better, more natural at least, and function much better as a send for processing multiple sources.

Digital stuff can be good (plugins too) but I find that as a send on more than one thing they start to fall apart, get muddy, just stop sounding good. If you're willing to print fx separately one at a time you can certainly get great results but I find it to kill workflow and be just generally inconvenient.

User avatar
calaverasgrandes
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3233
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: Oakland
Contact:

Post by calaverasgrandes » Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:36 am

The best reverb I ever heard was a large, very asymetrical room with a mic up close on the amp, and another mic about as far away as possible. Hardware verbs can't imitate the molecular detail a reverb like that has.
Though to be fair, you would have to have a studio in a grain silo to imitate the cavernous verbs that the hardware boxes can do.
And modulated verbs are hard to make IRL unless you use a rotating speaker (or rotating mic?).
??????? wrote: "everything sounds best right before it blows up."

substitute
pushin' record
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 8:28 am

Post by substitute » Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:40 pm

Chris (or any one else for that matter),
I noticed you've got some nice reverbs, and I've noticed you've recorded lot's of bands. Could you post links to some tunes that you feel showcases the Sony, Klark Teknik or what have you?
Have you considered something other than a digital unit? Do you have a spare room you might be able to set up as a chamber? How about a DIY plate?

They both have their downsides, notably space and ambient noise issues. However the upside is they'll likely sound far better, more natural at least, and function much better as a send for processing multiple sources.

Digital stuff can be good (plugins too) but I find that as a send on more than one thing they start to fall apart, get muddy, just stop sounding good. If you're willing to print fx separately one at a time you can certainly get great results but I find it to kill workflow and be just generally inconvenient.
That has been on my mind, there's a fairly large bathroom I could work with, space wise a plate would be tough but not totally out of the question. I've read over the instructions, I'm reasonably competent with a mig welder and the electronics are all very easy but it still seems like a lot.

I was listening to GnR and Mellencamp this morning in regards to the srv2000 and 80's yamaha units, maybe this is over generalizing but I'm looking for something more natural sounding. Then I listened to the first two Tom Petty records, those still sound very "studio" to me but in a way I much prefer.

User avatar
Snarl 12/8
cryogenically thawing
Posts: 3510
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:01 pm
Location: Right Cheer
Contact:

Post by Snarl 12/8 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:01 pm

Maybe I'm insane, but I've always felt like it was pretty easy to dial in a "natural sounding" verb on my Yamaha Rev 7. In fact, there are only a couple of verbs on it that sound really over the top. (Unless you tweak parameters to the extremes.) The way I look at it, the Rev 7 is a room simulator. And some of the verbs have essentially all of the important acoustic parameters of real rooms up for tweaking. Predelay, absorbtion, size, etc. You can make it sound weird mostly only in the ways that some real rooms sound weird. Flutter echoes, phasey shit, etc.

I always associate the SPX 90 with that overwrought 80's sound, but not its cousin, the Rev 7. But I might be a complete philistine when it comes to tastes in "natural sounding" audio. And I don't have much experience as an operator of the SPX90 although I bought a Rev 7 new in 1986 and still have it.
Carl Keil

Almost forgot: Please steal my drum tracks. and more.

User avatar
calaverasgrandes
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3233
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: Oakland
Contact:

Post by calaverasgrandes » Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:13 pm

The ITB TC Electronic reverbs always sounded very natural to me. Their hardware cousins always seemed a little hyped sounding. Going on the assertion that the ones on a Powercore are the same algorithms as the hardware boxes, I wonder if it is all just in the conversion?
??????? wrote: "everything sounds best right before it blows up."

telepathy
pushin' record
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 2:07 am
Location: Somerville, MA
Contact:

Post by telepathy » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:28 pm

yeah, the SPX90 can sound OK with the right tweaking and a little EQ/filtering on the send & return, but most of the time it ends up sounding like bad small-club 80's/90's disaster reverb.
get up with it

substitute
pushin' record
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 8:28 am

Post by substitute » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:55 pm

Maybe I'm insane, but I've always felt like it was pretty easy to dial in a "natural sounding" verb on my Yamaha Rev 7. In fact, there are only a couple of verbs on it that sound really over the top. (Unless you tweak parameters to the extremes.) The way I look at it, the Rev 7 is a room simulator. And some of the verbs have essentially all of the important acoustic parameters of real rooms up for tweaking. Predelay, absorbtion, size, etc. You can make it sound weird mostly only in the ways that some real rooms sound weird. Flutter echoes, phasey shit, etc.
That's a really informative review, thanks.
yeah, the SPX90 can sound OK with the right tweaking and a little EQ/filtering on the send & return, but most of the time it ends up sounding like bad small-club 80's/90's disaster reverb.
not my cup of tea

In other news, I hooked up my TC Nova stomp box to the reverb send tonight. It sounded really good if I kept it tasteful. I wonder what if anything it has in common with their rack units. I'm definitely gonna look at the TC's now.

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by cgarges » Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:49 pm

substitute wrote:Chris (or any one else for that matter),
I noticed you've got some nice reverbs, and I've noticed you've recorded lot's of bands. Could you post links to some tunes that you feel showcases the Sony, Klark Teknik or what have you?
My memory's shifty on what I've used on what, but I feel fairly certain that drum verbs on these albums would have been the DN780:
http://www.sunshonestill.com/ (from "ThewaytheworldDies")
http://www.gotheremusic.com/sounds.html
http://www.amazon.com/Complicated-Life/dp/B004J7TZOC
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/davidtomaloff (from "Birds On Wires")
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/PublicGood (from "A Varied Program...")

On the Public Good record, you can really hear the sound of the 780 on many of the tunes. "Cooking For Two" and "I Wanna Be Clean" were mixed at The Fidelitorium and I used a Dynacord DRP-20 on the drums, but everything else is almost certainly the 780.

Hope this helps.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

User avatar
Nick Sevilla
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5555
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
Contact:

Post by Nick Sevilla » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:51 pm

ipressrecord wrote:
Nick Sevilla wrote:I have a Lexicon MX400.
It is good, and can be controlled via a "plugin" within your DAW.
Cheers
Tell me more.
Mac and PC? How is the integration as an AU plug-in running under Lion?
Jeff
Hi Jeff,
It is supposed to be Mac and PC... I have a Mac and it has been great.
I use it via SPDIF stright in and out from my PT HD rig.
Since I use PT, I use the stand alone editor/librarian outside of ProTools.
I did use the AU plug in on a couple of Logic Pro sessions, but this was a couple of years ago, so I cannot comment on Lion compatibility.
I also am running Snow Kitty on my HD rig... Lion roars only on my new laptop. And I have not onstalled Logic Pro on it yet...

Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.

jefe
audio school graduate
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:22 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by jefe » Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:56 pm

This is something I've been looking into myself. Like you, I have some good "bang for the buck" equipment (Hamptone HVTP2, Drip LA-2a, Speck ASCs, Beyerdynamic mics, AT-4060), but nothing ultra high-end. I also am recording to tape (1/2" Ampex 440-4).

I have an MPX-100, mentioned earlier, and I find it ok if used subtly. Some sounds do have a distinct digital graininess.

After spending a lot of time looking around, the Zerotronics spring reverbs are on my hit list. The sound samples (for all versions) are pretty impressive. Percussion doesn't sound springy unless pushed hard, and the vocal and flute samples are gorgeous. So when I get around to purchasing a new reverb, I'll be buying one of the Zerotronics models.

substitute
pushin' record
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 8:28 am

Post by substitute » Sat Apr 28, 2012 5:23 am

Cool, never heard of zereotronics I'll check it out. Chris, thanks so much for posting the links, obviously it's hard for me to separate what's mic technique, actual room, and added reverb but it does help provide some context.

I was just watching some bricasti videos, $3700 is still out of my price range, but when you compare that to what a high end lexicon unit cost in 1985 it's really a bargain.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 43 guests