Mastering Engineer help?
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:52 pm
- Location: Southeast Iowa
- Contact:
Mastering Engineer help?
Not sure if this is the right place to post this but I'm looking for recommendations (or suggestions). I'm far enough along in a project to realize that the limits of my mixing skills are surfacing and I'm hoping to ultimately work with a ME who'd be willing to provide any neccessary coaching. Perhaps this is standard pratice but my only other self-recorded project was squeezed in last minute with the ME and there was no time for feedback.
Any thoughts??
Any thoughts??
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
If it was me, I'd recommend spending more on mixing and less on mastering.
As a good rule of thumb, each earlier step in the process outweighs the ones that follow it. The song outweighs performance, which outweighs recording, which outweighs mixing, which outweighs mastering. After about a decade of doing this kind of thing for a living, there's no doubt in my mind that great mixing has a far more meaningful impact than great mastering.
I remember once an acquaintance asked me if I'd mix his full length album for $500. I had to politely refuse at that rate, but I found it interesting that he ended up mixing it himself and paid Greg Calbi (what I'm assuming was well over than $1000) to master it. In the end, it sounded like Greg Calbi (who is amazing) mastered a demo. It was loud enough, and the the frequency balance was inoffensive, but I'm not sure if I understand the value in that. When you have a hi-hat that's louder than your guitar solo, a narrow, static and presentation of the material, and vocal effects that don't do the song any justice, what's the point? That's my take, anyway.
Mastering a sloppy mix can certainly work if you're The Moldy Peaches, but I wouldn't recommend it for everyone.
As a good rule of thumb, each earlier step in the process outweighs the ones that follow it. The song outweighs performance, which outweighs recording, which outweighs mixing, which outweighs mastering. After about a decade of doing this kind of thing for a living, there's no doubt in my mind that great mixing has a far more meaningful impact than great mastering.
I remember once an acquaintance asked me if I'd mix his full length album for $500. I had to politely refuse at that rate, but I found it interesting that he ended up mixing it himself and paid Greg Calbi (what I'm assuming was well over than $1000) to master it. In the end, it sounded like Greg Calbi (who is amazing) mastered a demo. It was loud enough, and the the frequency balance was inoffensive, but I'm not sure if I understand the value in that. When you have a hi-hat that's louder than your guitar solo, a narrow, static and presentation of the material, and vocal effects that don't do the song any justice, what's the point? That's my take, anyway.
Mastering a sloppy mix can certainly work if you're The Moldy Peaches, but I wouldn't recommend it for everyone.
Last edited by fossiltooth on Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:14 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5593
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
What Justin said.
The mastering is only a slight polish and volume adjustment.
It cannot change the internal relationships of single elements of a mix.
Can I ask, where you got the idea that a Mastering Engineer can somehow alleviate mixing shortcomings? Because that is simply not true.
Cheers
The mastering is only a slight polish and volume adjustment.
It cannot change the internal relationships of single elements of a mix.
Can I ask, where you got the idea that a Mastering Engineer can somehow alleviate mixing shortcomings? Because that is simply not true.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Also Dennis, as far as coaching goes, there's almost no better learning experience than working with a good mixer on material you're familiar with, and then asking the mixer what he did. I've learned a ton from guys who have mixed things that I've recorded, and I've also learned a ton about recording from mixing tracks recorded by others. (I'd like to think that this has been a two-way street as well, but you'd really have to ask them! )
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:52 pm
- Location: Southeast Iowa
- Contact:
Thank you both.
I'm pretty happy with the mixes but I'm just uncertain of them. And I realize that a ME can't alleviate mixing shortcomings. To be clear, I was hoping to find a ME that would provide feedback if the mastering process revealed anything that was problematic. A friend of mine played on a project where the ME (Rick Fisher) did this sort of thing and the band went back and made the changes before returning to finish the master. Rick mastered our first CD and I tried someone else on the second -- both did great jobs and I may just return to either of them but I like the idea of trying someone new.
And I love the idea of working with a mixer but I just don't have the budget. This is a is very small run side project of mine that will not see any tour support so I've got to keep the outlays very small. It would be great to take it to a good mix engineer and see what is done to my project. I'm not going to rule it out. Perhaps I could have them do a single and try to learn from that?
Thanks again.
I'm pretty happy with the mixes but I'm just uncertain of them. And I realize that a ME can't alleviate mixing shortcomings. To be clear, I was hoping to find a ME that would provide feedback if the mastering process revealed anything that was problematic. A friend of mine played on a project where the ME (Rick Fisher) did this sort of thing and the band went back and made the changes before returning to finish the master. Rick mastered our first CD and I tried someone else on the second -- both did great jobs and I may just return to either of them but I like the idea of trying someone new.
And I love the idea of working with a mixer but I just don't have the budget. This is a is very small run side project of mine that will not see any tour support so I've got to keep the outlays very small. It would be great to take it to a good mix engineer and see what is done to my project. I'm not going to rule it out. Perhaps I could have them do a single and try to learn from that?
Thanks again.
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Not a bad idea! I had a band hire me to mix the 3 lead tracks on their album recently, and they did the rest themselves. Those 3 ended up being the tracks that helped them get some real press, and that's not an uncommon approach for burgeoning artists to take.dennisjames wrote:It would be great to take it to a good mix engineer and see what is done to my project. I'm not going to rule it out. Perhaps I could have them do a single and try to learn from that?
Just off the top of my head, if you listen to the first Pretenders record you can really hear the difference between "Brass In Pocket" and literally, everything else on the album. It fits with everything else, but there are reasons that one stood out and grabbed people on the radio at the time.
There are a lot of great mixers out there who are affordable if you're uncertain whether the tracks that you'll be promoting are all the way "there" just yet. Getting someone from that weird mainstream cabal of mixerdudes like Joe Chiccarelli or CLA or Puig probably costs a fortune, but there are plenty of guys who do great work outside of that world. I know that Chris Shaw mixes at home these days, so he's probably on the affordable side for a something of a "name" guy. (He's the guy who mixed Weezer's Blue Album for chrissakes! Bob Dylan's modern stuff, too.)
When I mix at home, I know I charge just $350 a song for self-financed projects (and less than that for albums and sparse material.) Compare something like that to the cost of halfway-decent mastering, and you're not talking about two different worlds when it comes to your budget. And whenever the mix isn't quite there yet, the impact from mixing is way more meaningful than mastering.
Mastering is something you do to tracks that already kick ass everywhere, just to be doubly sure that they'll kick ass everywhere.
Last edited by fossiltooth on Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Absolutely agree. Achieving a good, well balanced mix far outweighs the importance of high-end mastering. Once you are ready for mastering, find an ME who's able to spend the time to communicate with you about any issues best addressed in the mixing process. Critique is good. Just don't book your release show before the mastering session.
Audio Mastering in Portland, OR
www.vitamastering.com
www.vitamastering.com
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:52 pm
- Location: Southeast Iowa
- Contact:
-
- speech impediment
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
- Contact:
Any ME should be open to providing you with feedback that will help you provide them with better mixes to master. If they aren't, you should find someone else.
Studio - http://www.hookechosound.com
Label - http://www.wearenicepeople.com
Band - http://www.depthandcurrent.com
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/HoodEchoSound
Label - http://www.wearenicepeople.com
Band - http://www.depthandcurrent.com
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/HoodEchoSound
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:52 pm
- Location: Southeast Iowa
- Contact:
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6687
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
- SafeandSoundMastering
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:34 am
- Contact:
The mix is very important and I think you will find many mastering studios will provide some feedback on your mixes. I often do for my clients new and old. So much does depend on taste for mix downs but this is where it is actually very useful if the mastering engineer has actually had a lot of real world professional mixing experience. So many mastering engineers have just sprang up with seemingly no real audio engineering history, lol.
Before taking mix advice check what your mastering engineer has been doing in their career thus far.
SafeandSound Mastering
music mastering
Before taking mix advice check what your mastering engineer has been doing in their career thus far.
SafeandSound Mastering
music mastering
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests