Bingo.Nick Sevilla wrote:
That is the whole point of making music, isn't it?
Sound City film, lots of tapeoppery
- MichaelAlan
- tinnitus
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 9:21 am
- Location: Passing under Sleep's dark and silent gate
- Contact:
Killer.Nick Sevilla wrote:That is the whole point of making music, isn't it?agershon wrote:Details aside, I was inspired by the movie.
I came to my band after watching and demanded we quit recording tracks separately, at home in front of our own computers, both engineer and performer.
Last weekend we all set up in my garage and hit record. We nailed drum/bass/piano tracks for two songs in under 3 hours and IT WAS FUN.
I also enjoyed this film. Guy's an animal.
All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet...
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
Watched it last night. I thought it was a pretty cool story, and a few things jumped out at me.
- the image we have (or I have) of 70s rock bands recording in palatial places like Record Plant vs. the fact that so many astounding records were made in such a total dump. Seriously, I always wondered why the inner sleeve band photo on You Can Tune A Piano But You Can't Tuna Fish showed the band posing in front of an ugly grey plastic sheet, but it was probably the nicest background they could find in the place.
- the painstaking account of the gradual failure of the studio's business model as set against the creeping advance of digital/computer recording, and not a single interviewee said "gee, maybe we should have figured out a way to adapt to the changing landscape" or "hey, our studio's major successes grew out of an investment in the exciting new technology of the day (the mixing console that's the main character in this movie), and our studio's failure was a result of religiously avoiding the exciting new technology of the day (digital) twenty years later...that's odd."
(and yes, I know the entire big-studio world has collapsed, and it was probably unavoidable, but still.)
- the way everyone who talked about Trent Reznor had to dance around the fact that he's embraced the computer recording paradigm that they're blaming for the failure of their studio. "Well, sure, he's a Pro Tools guy but he's one of the good ones."
- the image we have (or I have) of 70s rock bands recording in palatial places like Record Plant vs. the fact that so many astounding records were made in such a total dump. Seriously, I always wondered why the inner sleeve band photo on You Can Tune A Piano But You Can't Tuna Fish showed the band posing in front of an ugly grey plastic sheet, but it was probably the nicest background they could find in the place.
- the painstaking account of the gradual failure of the studio's business model as set against the creeping advance of digital/computer recording, and not a single interviewee said "gee, maybe we should have figured out a way to adapt to the changing landscape" or "hey, our studio's major successes grew out of an investment in the exciting new technology of the day (the mixing console that's the main character in this movie), and our studio's failure was a result of religiously avoiding the exciting new technology of the day (digital) twenty years later...that's odd."
(and yes, I know the entire big-studio world has collapsed, and it was probably unavoidable, but still.)
- the way everyone who talked about Trent Reznor had to dance around the fact that he's embraced the computer recording paradigm that they're blaming for the failure of their studio. "Well, sure, he's a Pro Tools guy but he's one of the good ones."
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5587
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
dwlb's post is good.
I agree that this small studio could have survived if they embraced digital.
Well done digital is as good as anything else.
Badly done tape can suck as bad or worse than anything else.
Again, it's the Operator, not the Tools.
As an excellent example : Roger Nichols.
I agree that this small studio could have survived if they embraced digital.
Well done digital is as good as anything else.
Badly done tape can suck as bad or worse than anything else.
Again, it's the Operator, not the Tools.
As an excellent example : Roger Nichols.
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
I just saw the film last night.
Firstly, I enjoyed it and commend Grohl for doing it. Although I am not much of a Foo Fighters fan (I liked the first two), I love his drumming and he seems like a good guy with his heart in the right place.
Overall, I learned a lot I didn't know and agree with the original poster's points.
I definitely thought the PT-bashing part was a little simplistic and one-sided. I too found the end to be the weakest part. I would have preferred a smidge of that stuff in the film with the bulk of it relegated to DVD bonus-land.
The other thing I thought was... OK, Grohl certainly knows that the room is a huge part of the sound of the studio but he acts as if it's all about the board. He seemed to have an obsession with board. He's also a man of serious means. Here he is lamenting the studio's demise in a big way but what could he have done to preserve the legendary room? Now he's got the board but the other half of the equation is lost.
I felt that despite his deep passion for the studio, it seemed Grohl wanted the board in his own studio more than he wanted to preserve the full picture of what made that place so legendary.
I wish they had covered this aspect. Why no word about the fate of the room?
Firstly, I enjoyed it and commend Grohl for doing it. Although I am not much of a Foo Fighters fan (I liked the first two), I love his drumming and he seems like a good guy with his heart in the right place.
Overall, I learned a lot I didn't know and agree with the original poster's points.
I definitely thought the PT-bashing part was a little simplistic and one-sided. I too found the end to be the weakest part. I would have preferred a smidge of that stuff in the film with the bulk of it relegated to DVD bonus-land.
The other thing I thought was... OK, Grohl certainly knows that the room is a huge part of the sound of the studio but he acts as if it's all about the board. He seemed to have an obsession with board. He's also a man of serious means. Here he is lamenting the studio's demise in a big way but what could he have done to preserve the legendary room? Now he's got the board but the other half of the equation is lost.
I felt that despite his deep passion for the studio, it seemed Grohl wanted the board in his own studio more than he wanted to preserve the full picture of what made that place so legendary.
I wish they had covered this aspect. Why no word about the fate of the room?
-
- tinnitus
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:19 am
- Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
- Contact:
I worked at Sound City back in the 1980's, before "Nevermind". It was a dumpy studio with a funny odor. The Neve was beat up and several channels didn't work. It had shagg carpet on the walls and it was somewhat depressing to work there. The room didn't sound any different than any house or garage with shagg carpet on the walls. Asthetically, it was set up in an industrial park in stucco Van Nuys, down the street from my old shop. You have arc welders and stuff next door.Leopold wrote:And I'm sure that Neve sounds great but that "mojo" piece of gear myth is exactly that, a myth. The more records I make, the less and less important the gear becomes, but I guess they have to make it like the Lord of the Rings or something...the Journey of the Neve...
Eddie
Funny how a couple of good selling recordings changes perceptions towards studios.
Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Audio Upgrades
Not for you though, eh.Jim Williams wrote:
Funny how a couple of good selling recordings changes perceptions towards studios.
Perhaps people are taking an interest in the studio because they love listening to the music that came out of it. Reducing it to "a couple of good selling records" is just a caricature in order to invalidate somebody's differing point of view.
That lady is so full of herself it's not funny. At the end of the show, after she finishes her bellydance, she tells Letterman something about Dave Grohl forgetting to mention...blah blah blah I did....really? So having you in the film,having you on the record, having you in the band, having you on Letterman isn't enough...you're still looking for more "credit"?agershon wrote:Clips from Letterman last night:
Dave sits down with Dave to talk Sound City Movie http://bit.ly/ZflwD0
Sound City players featuring Stevie Nicks LIVE ? Watch "You Can't Fix This" http://youtu.be/IArjEzvUOo0
"I raged against the machine and all this money came out!" Bart Simpson
- Brian Dorn
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:28 am
- Contact:
I really agree with this. You need some gear, obviously, but not much.Leopold wrote:The more records I make, the less and less important the gear becomes
I enjoyed the film. My favorite quote in it came from Reznor: "Now that everyone is empowered with these tools to create stuff, has there been a lot more great shit coming out? Not really. You still have to have something to do with those tools."
www.briandorn.NET
"Now that everyone is empowered with these tools to create stuff, has there been a lot more great shit coming out? Not really. You still have to have something to do with those tools." -Trent Reznor, Sound City
"Now that everyone is empowered with these tools to create stuff, has there been a lot more great shit coming out? Not really. You still have to have something to do with those tools." -Trent Reznor, Sound City
Maybe a custom Maton? He seems to only play those guitars now a days.Justine_X wrote:Anyone able to identify the hollowbody bass Josh Homme is playing during the "Mantra" jam with Reznor? It's around the 3/4 mark in the film.
Thought it might be Epiphone or Hofner, but the headstock doesn't seem to match:
E
"I raged against the machine and all this money came out!" Bart Simpson
-
- pluggin' in mics
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 9:18 am
fossiltooth wrote:I have an ok review of it out as well. Slightly more diplomatic still, but I couldn't help but share some of the same concerns under the surface
hahahaha fuck yeah, you linked my "WTF?" thread in your article!
the very next band i went in the studio to record, i made the drums/bass do this. we did the rhythm tracks for the ep in 2 days. and it was like..."wow...it CAN be this easy..." AND...little to no editing or anything, cus i really CANT do buy so much. "just gotta do it again!"agershon wrote:I came to my band after watching and demanded we quit recording tracks separately, at home in front of our own computers, both engineer and performer.
- CraigS63
- suffering 'studio suck'
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Naperville, IL
Late to the party (just saw the movie on VH1), I liked it, I had no expectations and didn't know much about the studio before I saw it.
It was a little strange that they put some Gary Numan video clips up when talking about sequenced/Pro Tools music, the videos they used were from Pleasure Principle-era ('79-80), a few years before computerized sequencing of stuff. I wasn't clear on McCartney's connection to the studio either. Needed more Cheap Trick.
It was a little strange that they put some Gary Numan video clips up when talking about sequenced/Pro Tools music, the videos they used were from Pleasure Principle-era ('79-80), a few years before computerized sequencing of stuff. I wasn't clear on McCartney's connection to the studio either. Needed more Cheap Trick.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests