best mix position in odd shaped room?
best mix position in odd shaped room?
I have a room that is more or less L shaped, in that it has a large opening into a foyer on one end. (see below) The dimensions are approx 17ft x 14ft. There is a beam across the narrow dimension that divides the ceiling. The ceiling is approx 8ft on one side and slopes on the other side.
I have had my mix position firing across the narrow dimension of the room, that position was recommeded to me by a tech who was helping me at the time, probably to achieve symmetrical reflections from the sides.
I am considering moving the mix position to either one end of the room or the other. Alternative 1 below takes advantage of the slope of the ceiling, and I could add a false ceiling (shown in lavender) to the other side of the room, but presents a challenge of dealing with the asymmetry of the side reflections. Nevertheless it is my instinctive preference.
Alternative 2 would offer more symmetrical side reflections, but I think the slope of the ceiling would be working against me.
I do plan on adding room treatment panels, etc. and perhaps could deal with the asymmetry that way.
Thoughs?
I have had my mix position firing across the narrow dimension of the room, that position was recommeded to me by a tech who was helping me at the time, probably to achieve symmetrical reflections from the sides.
I am considering moving the mix position to either one end of the room or the other. Alternative 1 below takes advantage of the slope of the ceiling, and I could add a false ceiling (shown in lavender) to the other side of the room, but presents a challenge of dealing with the asymmetry of the side reflections. Nevertheless it is my instinctive preference.
Alternative 2 would offer more symmetrical side reflections, but I think the slope of the ceiling would be working against me.
I do plan on adding room treatment panels, etc. and perhaps could deal with the asymmetry that way.
Thoughs?
Yes.
I mean, "alternative 1".
My problem with the "current" is that the room seems inefficiently used, and the ceiling might/could be weird there.
My problem with "alternative 2" is I suspect the closet wall may vibrate a little differently/more than the opposite wall (even with the window in it), and the space is narrower and thus tighter, and the window behind might have to be blocked, altho' roscoenyc makes fair points.
I mean, "alternative 1".
My problem with the "current" is that the room seems inefficiently used, and the ceiling might/could be weird there.
My problem with "alternative 2" is I suspect the closet wall may vibrate a little differently/more than the opposite wall (even with the window in it), and the space is narrower and thus tighter, and the window behind might have to be blocked, altho' roscoenyc makes fair points.
- GIK Acoustics
- pluggin' in mics
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:34 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA & Bradford, UK
- Contact:
Yes, you have a quite common problem in most of these setups.
In the first diagram, your ceiling prevents you from having an equal stereo image. In the second diagram, your low frequency and high frequency symmetry are off. In the third, your low frequency symmetry is off, but your high frequency symmetry isn't off.
Though none of them are excellent choices, I would stay where you're currently at (though it doesn't look like you're exactly centered, which I would suggest).
Treating the ceiling above should help remove most of the stereo imbalance caused by the ceiling.
In any of the orientations, I would definitely recommend treating the room to get rid of modal resonances, treat the first reflections, and preferably the wall behind you. Given these, your current position definitely seems best to get all of that taken care of.
In the first diagram, your ceiling prevents you from having an equal stereo image. In the second diagram, your low frequency and high frequency symmetry are off. In the third, your low frequency symmetry is off, but your high frequency symmetry isn't off.
Though none of them are excellent choices, I would stay where you're currently at (though it doesn't look like you're exactly centered, which I would suggest).
Treating the ceiling above should help remove most of the stereo imbalance caused by the ceiling.
In any of the orientations, I would definitely recommend treating the room to get rid of modal resonances, treat the first reflections, and preferably the wall behind you. Given these, your current position definitely seems best to get all of that taken care of.
Last edited by GIK Acoustics on Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alexander Reynolds
GIK Acoustics USA | (770) 986 2789
GIK Acoustics Europe | +44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)
GIK Acoustics USA | (770) 986 2789
GIK Acoustics Europe | +44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5572
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
I vote for testing.
Is that a window on the right most wall? They can be a nightmare, or can help with reflectivity.
Also, when mixing, I HIGHLY recommend choosing one or two calibrated levels, I use 72 dB and 82 dB (the optimal), and do not deviate from that during mixing.
Your testing should be done with 82 dB level at the mix position. Place your measuring microphone right where your head is during mixing for the tests, to set your 82 dB listening level, and then measure the room using only that level.
If you use different levels during measurement, you will never finish, and never get anything meaningful out of the tests.
Cheers
Is that a window on the right most wall? They can be a nightmare, or can help with reflectivity.
Also, when mixing, I HIGHLY recommend choosing one or two calibrated levels, I use 72 dB and 82 dB (the optimal), and do not deviate from that during mixing.
Your testing should be done with 82 dB level at the mix position. Place your measuring microphone right where your head is during mixing for the tests, to set your 82 dB listening level, and then measure the room using only that level.
If you use different levels during measurement, you will never finish, and never get anything meaningful out of the tests.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- Brett Siler
- moves faders with mind
- Posts: 2518
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 12:16 pm
- Location: Evansville, IN
- Contact:
I would chooses "alternate 2" but completely cover that 1/3rd of the room with bass trapping material, including clouds on the ceiling.
My musical endeavors!
My Music: http://www.brettsiler.bandcamp.com/
StudioMother Brain Sound Infrastructure
My Music: http://www.brettsiler.bandcamp.com/
StudioMother Brain Sound Infrastructure
What reference signal do you use to set your 82dB point? 1kHz sine wave? Pink noise? White noise? Other?Nick Sevilla wrote:Also, when mixing, I HIGHLY recommend choosing one or two calibrated levels, I use 72 dB and 82 dB (the optimal), and do not deviate from that during mixing.
Your testing should be done with 82 dB level at the mix position. Place your measuring microphone right where your head is during mixing for the tests, to set your 82 dB listening level, and then measure the room using only that level.
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5572
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
White noise, and also check the sine wave, although the sine will probably be affected by any room modes if I'm unlucky enough to be standing in one related to that frequency. I also check with program material.groover wrote:What reference signal do you use to set your 82dB point? 1kHz sine wave? Pink noise? White noise? Other?Nick Sevilla wrote:Also, when mixing, I HIGHLY recommend choosing one or two calibrated levels, I use 72 dB and 82 dB (the optimal), and do not deviate from that during mixing.
Your testing should be done with 82 dB level at the mix position. Place your measuring microphone right where your head is during mixing for the tests, to set your 82 dB listening level, and then measure the room using only that level.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5572
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
White noise, and also check the sine wave, although the sine will probably be affected by any room modes if I'm unlucky enough to be standing in one related to that frequency. I also check with program material.groover wrote:What reference signal do you use to set your 82dB point? 1kHz sine wave? Pink noise? White noise? Other?Nick Sevilla wrote:Also, when mixing, I HIGHLY recommend choosing one or two calibrated levels, I use 72 dB and 82 dB (the optimal), and do not deviate from that during mixing.
Your testing should be done with 82 dB level at the mix position. Place your measuring microphone right where your head is during mixing for the tests, to set your 82 dB listening level, and then measure the room using only that level.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- GIK Acoustics
- pluggin' in mics
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:34 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA & Bradford, UK
- Contact:
As another poster above suggested..
If you've got a microphone handy, download REW (its free) and take measurements at each of the locations to really decide the best setup (I would base it off how the low end looks - the high end s much easier to treat properly)
You can check out the following video that explains how to set up and start using REW for measurements: http://gikacoustics.com/room-eq-wizard-tutorial/
If you've got a microphone handy, download REW (its free) and take measurements at each of the locations to really decide the best setup (I would base it off how the low end looks - the high end s much easier to treat properly)
You can check out the following video that explains how to set up and start using REW for measurements: http://gikacoustics.com/room-eq-wizard-tutorial/
Alexander Reynolds
GIK Acoustics USA | (770) 986 2789
GIK Acoustics Europe | +44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)
GIK Acoustics USA | (770) 986 2789
GIK Acoustics Europe | +44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests