Depth of Field and Recording Levels
-
- gimme a little kick & snare
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:56 pm
- Location: Factory Outlet-Maine
Depth of Field and Recording Levels
Hi gang. I’m tracking at home on to tape and I’m interested in people’s thoughts on tracking levels for instruments that are going to be in the back of the mix. Conventional wisdom is to keep my noise floor as low as possible by keeping my levels up. But I’m thinking that tracking something at a low level might pay off in the mix, as I will be getting more appropriate roll-off for a sound that will be “back there” anyway.
The reason I ask is I’m having some trouble getting some congas to sit in the mix. Even at a low level in the mix, every so often they seem to clunk and thunk and the sound cuts right to the front of the mix, which I’d like to avoid. I’m thinking tracking them at a lower level may help, even if I’m breaking the noise floor rule. I hate to do it for some reason. It’s the one “rule” I try not to let myself break. But in this case will it help me?
The reason I ask is I’m having some trouble getting some congas to sit in the mix. Even at a low level in the mix, every so often they seem to clunk and thunk and the sound cuts right to the front of the mix, which I’d like to avoid. I’m thinking tracking them at a lower level may help, even if I’m breaking the noise floor rule. I hate to do it for some reason. It’s the one “rule” I try not to let myself break. But in this case will it help me?
dehumidified
- A.David.MacKinnon
- ears didn't survive the freeze
- Posts: 3822
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:57 am
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
A lot depends on your signal to noise ratio. Try it and see what happens. It may work or you may have some of the same issues and extra hiss thrown in too.
Two things come to mind with conga (and any percussion really) -
#1 what mic are you using? If it's bright it'll feel forward even with tape rolling out some highs. I like dynamics on congas. RE15 or something from that family is my go to. 421s are great too.
#2 try backing the mic up. If the instrument is meant to be in the back sometimes a bit of distance on the mic will make a big difference.
Two things come to mind with conga (and any percussion really) -
#1 what mic are you using? If it's bright it'll feel forward even with tape rolling out some highs. I like dynamics on congas. RE15 or something from that family is my go to. 421s are great too.
#2 try backing the mic up. If the instrument is meant to be in the back sometimes a bit of distance on the mic will make a big difference.
- losthighway
- resurrected
- Posts: 2351
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
Couple things come to mind:
If you're absolutely certain something is going to be mixed fairly low, than the importance of the noise floor is proportionately lower to how low it will be in the mix. I don't work on tape, but I've had some tracks that were processed by all kinds of nasty noisemakers- crummy stompboxes, dirty spring reverbs, that were also serving a less central role in the audio picture. These elements come in and out throughout the song and its amazing how the dirt on their fingerprint gets lost. This of course is completely dependent on the density of the mix as well, but you get my point.
Also, sorry if this is obvious, but what about compression? I often find percussion elements that are there for color can handle more compression than the starring drum kit, then they can kind of stay in place at that medium-low level where you don't have the problem that you're not sure if there are hits you're not hearing, and then ones that are jumping out too much.
If you're absolutely certain something is going to be mixed fairly low, than the importance of the noise floor is proportionately lower to how low it will be in the mix. I don't work on tape, but I've had some tracks that were processed by all kinds of nasty noisemakers- crummy stompboxes, dirty spring reverbs, that were also serving a less central role in the audio picture. These elements come in and out throughout the song and its amazing how the dirt on their fingerprint gets lost. This of course is completely dependent on the density of the mix as well, but you get my point.
Also, sorry if this is obvious, but what about compression? I often find percussion elements that are there for color can handle more compression than the starring drum kit, then they can kind of stay in place at that medium-low level where you don't have the problem that you're not sure if there are hits you're not hearing, and then ones that are jumping out too much.
- DrummerMan
- george martin
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 12:18 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
I get this with Congas a lot. That thumpiness really starts to feel like they're taking over and that threshold between being present and overpowering becomes a fine line.
A couple thing I do sometimes:
Use a more sensitive LDC from farther away. I've got a c12 imitation that picks up EVERYTHING so I can have a kind of quiet source 5 feet away and the noise floor is not really bad.
Roll off the low end and add a little room reverb. Obviously you've got more options and flexibility like this digitally, so may or may not be applicable to your situation.
Realized that those little moments where the thing is just barely too loud or too present is really something that will probably only bother ME, as the player and engineer and going down a rabbit hole of trying to get it perfect somehow will only waste my time and possible negatively affect what's already cool about the mix..
A couple thing I do sometimes:
Use a more sensitive LDC from farther away. I've got a c12 imitation that picks up EVERYTHING so I can have a kind of quiet source 5 feet away and the noise floor is not really bad.
Roll off the low end and add a little room reverb. Obviously you've got more options and flexibility like this digitally, so may or may not be applicable to your situation.
Realized that those little moments where the thing is just barely too loud or too present is really something that will probably only bother ME, as the player and engineer and going down a rabbit hole of trying to get it perfect somehow will only waste my time and possible negatively affect what's already cool about the mix..
- losthighway
- resurrected
- Posts: 2351
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
Yeah, I'm not as pumped on adding digital reverb to drums as a matter of course as I used to be. I was just working on some latin-type stuff (with incredible mastering work by Morespaceecho) and the combination of my room mic and a pinch of the digital reverb gave me that rush of gratification from hearing something I associate with the sonics of something I love (Buena Vista Social Club). There's something about congas that sound like they're interacting with hard walls.DrummerMan wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 8:10 amRoll off the low end and add a little room reverb. Obviously you've got more options and flexibility like this digitally, so may or may not be applicable to your situation.
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
^^^^^ That track sounded great!
To the OP: I wouldn't record stuff low on tape on purpose, that's not going to do what you're looking to do, and it's just going to raise your noise floor. Record at a normal level and pull the faders back. If the congas (or whatever) are sticking out too much, try some fast attack/release compression to pull the transients back. Can also try adding some reverb and/or rolling off some high end.
To the OP: I wouldn't record stuff low on tape on purpose, that's not going to do what you're looking to do, and it's just going to raise your noise floor. Record at a normal level and pull the faders back. If the congas (or whatever) are sticking out too much, try some fast attack/release compression to pull the transients back. Can also try adding some reverb and/or rolling off some high end.
- Recycled_Brains
- resurrected
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:58 pm
- Location: Albany, NY
- Contact:
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
I always find heavier handed compression makes it so things never get out of the way, the exception being nuking a room mic or something like that I suppose. But I'd say maybe 80% of the times I've thought "why can't I get this to sit back a bit?", backing off or bypassing the compression altogether helped.
Depth of field, I find is more frequency and atmosphere dependent. Darker things sound further away. More reverb. More heavily low-passed delay. I use distortion and modulation often too. And panning. Sometimes I automate panning so things move around in the background and the listener doesn't have as much of a spacial location to hone in on. Anything to blur things out. I like those old windows you see in western films and really old farm houses. Transparent, but distorted. Idk. Maybe that's the talking, but that sort of imagery helps me figure out stuff like this.
I'm also just going to put it out there.... maybe the congas aren't right for the arrangement and that's why you're struggling so much to get them to fit.
Depth of field, I find is more frequency and atmosphere dependent. Darker things sound further away. More reverb. More heavily low-passed delay. I use distortion and modulation often too. And panning. Sometimes I automate panning so things move around in the background and the listener doesn't have as much of a spacial location to hone in on. Anything to blur things out. I like those old windows you see in western films and really old farm houses. Transparent, but distorted. Idk. Maybe that's the talking, but that sort of imagery helps me figure out stuff like this.
I'm also just going to put it out there.... maybe the congas aren't right for the arrangement and that's why you're struggling so much to get them to fit.
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
Maybe point a mic at another surface in the room (the wall or control room window for example) instead of the congas.
- Scodiddly
- genitals didn't survive the freeze
- Posts: 3984
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 6:38 am
- Location: Mundelein, IL, USA
- Contact:
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
If you record something very low in the meters, then when you mix you'll be pushing the fader up to 0dB. So you'll end up getting your source quieter, but the noise floor will be as high as you'd have for a featured instrument.
A lot of the suggestions tend to produce the effect of using high and low pass filters - maybe just try that first? Tuned percussion can fit into a very small frequency space.
A lot of the suggestions tend to produce the effect of using high and low pass filters - maybe just try that first? Tuned percussion can fit into a very small frequency space.
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 7486
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Bloomington IL
- Contact:
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
Congas are very dynamic. The technique is pretty much designed that way. I'm with MSE thinking fast compression might be the ticket. Possibly parallel compression, with a higher ratio.
You don't mention what machine you're using. I'd venture a guess that you don't have a late model Studer (820/827). That to me says, don't record low level, because the noise might become a problem. The dynamics, and the transient information of congas means you don't want to slam the tape either. Its quite easy to crunch up the transients in a bad way with certain percussion instruments.
You don't mention what machine you're using. I'd venture a guess that you don't have a late model Studer (820/827). That to me says, don't record low level, because the noise might become a problem. The dynamics, and the transient information of congas means you don't want to slam the tape either. Its quite easy to crunch up the transients in a bad way with certain percussion instruments.
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5574
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
Use a 6dB/octave hipass filter on them, and sweep up from below until their thumpiness no longer is an issue.
Also, if you are mixing in a DAW, you can automate this sweeping filter, even bypass it, in certain places where you want more of that thumpiness.
Also, if you are mixing in a DAW, you can automate this sweeping filter, even bypass it, in certain places where you want more of that thumpiness.
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- Recycled_Brains
- resurrected
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:58 pm
- Location: Albany, NY
- Contact:
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
This reminds me that a dynamic EQ or multiband compressor would probably be a smart move.Nick Sevilla wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 8:12 amAlso, if you are mixing in a DAW, you can automate this sweeping filter, even bypass it, in certain places where you want more of that thumpiness.
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
Recording level won't change much. Other things, such as mic choice, distance, amount of mics, room ambience, compression/limiting, and added verb will effect how it sits in the mix.
Re: Depth of Field and Recording Levels
Also, if your playback of a low-level track is thru FX in the DAW, they may not work as expected; ex., reverb won't be "excited" as much as by a high-level track.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 334 guests