difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

general questions, comments and ideas about recording, audio, music, etc.
Locked
User avatar
cassettefetish
steve albini likes it
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 9:59 pm

difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by cassettefetish » Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:24 pm

Does anyone know? I mean, other than 25$.

--Nick

Everybody's X
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 685
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 2:01 pm
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Contact:

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by Everybody's X » Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:29 pm

Name recognition?
I am curious about it too, I might just buy a pg 57 and the kick mic (pg 52?) and try them out.

Frequency charts are all the same.
It wouldn't surprise me if they are using the same capsules for everything in the mexican plant.

I bought a shure 14a off of ebay for $9 and I'll be damned if you can tell the difference between it and my 58
Dave Johnson
allcapsproductions.com

User avatar
ubertar
ears didn't survive the freeze
Posts: 3775
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:20 pm
Location: mid-Atlantic US
Contact:

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by ubertar » Wed Jan 05, 2005 3:10 pm

Not sure, but I think the difference is tighter quality control on the sm series.

User avatar
aikan
audio school graduate
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 9:38 pm
Location: TX, USA
Contact:

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by aikan » Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:05 pm

My impression is that cheaper things are usually less hardy than their more expensive counterparts. That is, they might do the job just as well when they're new, but a year of spit and being dropped might be more detrimental to a PG58 than an SM58.

That being said, the PG58 is dang popular for live music around here. Probably less likely to get stolen.

User avatar
cassettefetish
steve albini likes it
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 9:59 pm

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by cassettefetish » Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:15 pm

Well, that sort of comforts me as they are very gently handled and I never have an opportunity to record anyway. :)

--nick

User avatar
daveaux
pluggin' in mics
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 1:43 am
Location: New Orleans
Contact:

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by daveaux » Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:55 pm

ubertar wrote:Not sure, but I think the difference is tighter quality control on the sm series.
yeah, like the difference between the '57's and the old Unidyne series...remember them? silver, shaped like a 57 but with an ON/OFF switch. i was told by a music merchant that the only diff was that they spent the extra man-hours to inspect the more expensive ones but were the exact smae guts (i guess it's more trouble to actually build 2 different sets of components, unless it's something like a pre with an expensive transformer).

Shit, maybe i'll grab some for emergencies.
Daveaux
N.O.LA

User avatar
theistheman
pushin' record
Posts: 230
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Edgemont, SD/Chicago, IL

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by theistheman » Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:27 am

The PG kick drum mic sounds like butt.

Everybody's X
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 685
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 2:01 pm
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Contact:

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by Everybody's X » Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:29 am

theistheman wrote:The PG kick drum mic sounds like butt.
see that's the stuff we need to know
Dave Johnson
allcapsproductions.com

User avatar
Devlars
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:38 am
Location: In front of the computer

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by Devlars » Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:53 am

I would beg to differ with you. I think the PG52 sounds fantastic. Think of the kick sound on Wilco's 'A Ghost is Born' and that's about what it sounds like, lot's of thump and the slightest bit of definition.
"Yes, you're very smart. Now shut up."
-Peter Falk
Speakerphone
Rexrode Records

User avatar
Devlars
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:38 am
Location: In front of the computer

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by Devlars » Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:55 am

But that's not what we're supposed to be going on about is it, sorry. Back to the differences....anyone else?
"Yes, you're very smart. Now shut up."
-Peter Falk
Speakerphone
Rexrode Records

User avatar
ubertar
ears didn't survive the freeze
Posts: 3775
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:20 pm
Location: mid-Atlantic US
Contact:

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by ubertar » Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:05 am

daveaux wrote:
ubertar wrote:Not sure, but I think the difference is tighter quality control on the sm series.
yeah, like the difference between the '57's and the old Unidyne series...remember them? silver, shaped like a 57 but with an ON/OFF switch. i was told by a music merchant that the only diff was that they spent the extra man-hours to inspect the more expensive ones but were the exact smae guts (i guess it's more trouble to actually build 2 different sets of components, unless it's something like a pre with an expensive transformer).

Shit, maybe i'll grab some for emergencies.
No, the Unidyne III is the papa to the sm57. They're the same mic, just a slightly different look. Plus the U III 545 and 544 were both dual impedance. 545 was shipped as low Z and 544 as high Z. And they didn't all have an on/off switch, only the "s" models. The first sm 57s were called Unidyne III sm57 and like the 545 et al, they were made in the US. Current 57s are made in Mexico. A lot of people like the U III sm57 better. I do, but the difference isn't huge. QC was just as good for the 545 as the 57. They're pretty much the same mic. UTSF for more, this has been discussed before.

i am monster face
buyin' gear
Posts: 524
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Omaha
Contact:

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by i am monster face » Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:16 am

The PG series is mostly made of plastic. They also come with a crappy cable. The PG58 breaks A LOT (we have a lot of people come into the store with broken 58's being dropped on stage). Of course, with proper handling, they're not bad mics. I don't really notice a sound difference when I play a show and the tech hands me a pg instead of an SM series. But, check out the PG82, I like them much more than C1000's. They have a certain non-piercing high-endy thing to them that I like in a SDC. They're cheap. I wouldn't use them much, but they seem to be perfect for some things.

Ian

User avatar
marqueemoon
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1593
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:56 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: difference between Shure PG57/58 and SM57/58?

Post by marqueemoon » Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:37 am

I ran live sound with all PG dynamic mics a few times, and they SUCK ASS. Seriously. They were horrible. The rest of the rig was pretty decent, and anything run direct sounded fine. It was definitely the mics.
I the prostitute, shall not hide...
But I was very much bothered with my work!

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests