2 track vs. 4 track

general questions, comments and ideas about recording, audio, music, etc.
Locked
ccjones
studio intern
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 8:24 pm
Contact:

2 track vs. 4 track

Post by ccjones » Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:25 am

OK- so the wider the tape the better. If i want to warm my digital stereo mixes, and i have say a 22-4 (4-track) , if i run the left side of my digital mix to track 1 and 2 , then the right side to track 3 and 4 ........then the result would be the same as using say a 22-2 (2 track)....right? or am i missing something?


Duh,
CC

User avatar
cassettefetish
steve albini likes it
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 9:59 pm

Re: 2 track vs. 4 track

Post by cassettefetish » Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:38 am

Clever!

User avatar
bobbydj
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5357
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:58 am
Location: astride the vortex console
Contact:

Re: 2 track vs. 4 track

Post by bobbydj » Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:46 am

Azimuth would have to be absolutely spot-on or it would thin via a kind of phasing effect. Fuck knows. Sissy?
Bobby D. Jones
Producer/Engineer
(Wives with Knives, Tyrone P. Spink, Potemkin Villagers et al)

User avatar
soundguy
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: 2 track vs. 4 track

Post by soundguy » Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:57 am

If the 4 track is 1/4", the track width on the 22-2 will be wider as you have to account for the gap between the tracks.

dave
http://www.glideonfade.com
one hundred percent discrete transistor recording with style and care.

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7488
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Re: 2 track vs. 4 track

Post by drumsound » Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:12 pm

I believe this might be like communism...



I sounds like it makes sense, but it doesn't really work.

User avatar
bobbydj
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5357
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 2:58 am
Location: astride the vortex console
Contact:

Re: 2 track vs. 4 track

Post by bobbydj » Sat Jan 08, 2005 1:43 pm

Whereas capitalism doesn't sound like it will work and, uh, doesn't work.
Bobby D. Jones
Producer/Engineer
(Wives with Knives, Tyrone P. Spink, Potemkin Villagers et al)

mistersalty
audio school
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:22 pm
Location: In the midst of LA smog

Re: 2 track vs. 4 track

Post by mistersalty » Sat Jan 08, 2005 1:51 pm

No, I believe the correct phrasing in this is, capitalism makes you work. Elementary, my dear Watson.
Honor thy error as a hidden intention.

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7488
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Re: 2 track vs. 4 track

Post by drumsound » Sat Jan 08, 2005 2:14 pm

bobbydj wrote:Whereas capitalism doesn't sound like it will work and, uh, doesn't work.
Sad but true. Anyone ready for a change?

gog
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 3:48 am

Re: 2 track vs. 4 track

Post by gog » Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:38 pm

ccjones wrote:OK- so the wider the tape the better. If i want to warm my digital stereo mixes, and i have say a 22-4 (4-track) , if i run the left side of my digital mix to track 1 and 2 , then the right side to track 3 and 4 ........then the result would be the same as using say a 22-2 (2 track)....right? or am i missing something?


Duh,
CC
sorry, it doesn't work that way:
1/4 inch 2 track = 1/8 inch per track
1/4 inch 4 track = 1/16 inch per track

Rigsby
mixes from purgatory
Posts: 2908
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 12:34 am
Location: London, England
Contact:

Re: 2 track vs. 4 track

Post by Rigsby » Sun Jan 09, 2005 1:02 am

drumsound wrote:
bobbydj wrote:Whereas capitalism doesn't sound like it will work and, uh, doesn't work.
Sad but true. Anyone ready for a change?
Okay, what do you suggest, and how do we get the word around?
The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away.

rigsbysmith.com

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests