dooley or sank? reribboning

general questions, comments and ideas about recording, audio, music, etc.
User avatar
eeldip
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2139
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 5:10 pm
Location: NoPo

dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by eeldip » Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:06 am

anyone ever try both.. i have an RCA varacoustic with a 60 year old ribbon in it. just noticed it gets a little uh.. stressed out at unacceptably quiet levels (acoustic guitar at 8 inches is too close).

i seem to vaguely remember soundguy dave dissin the sank reribbon.

is wes dooley still the man?

anyone?

cgarges
zen recordist
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by cgarges » Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:07 am

Clarence Kane at ENAK Microphone repair in NJ rocks. Clarence used to work for RCA.

Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC

TomS
alignin' 24-trk
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 2:38 pm

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by TomS » Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:19 am

Sank did my 77DX, I have no complaints, although I'm nothihng like an expert on ribbons. I have praise, in fact. the mic had a non-standard piece where the yoke attached to the stand when I bought it, and the way it was set up was pretty wobbly, and when it came back with the new ribbon and "silk" (which he will tell you is not silk :D ) he had also made a better (if still non-standard) attachment for it. Free. He's a good guy and his work seems good to me. FWIW.

Preslav
gettin' sounds
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 8:08 am

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by Preslav » Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:27 am

Clarence at ENAK did a truly righteous job on an RCA 77D. Truly.



Preslav.

E-cue
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:47 am
Location: Lost Angeles

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by E-cue » Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:27 am

eeldip wrote:is wes dooley still the man?

anyone?
Of those 2, Wes is DEFINATELY the guy to goto. He's also not too far from you.

I'd also suggest calling the cats at Royer Labs. David Royer has done an exception job on a lot of my mic's- both ribbon, and LD condenser. I highly recommend him.

KFT
pushin' record
Posts: 230
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 3:55 pm
Location: Carmel

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by KFT » Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:27 am

FWIW, I haven't had any RCA's done but Stephen Sank re-ribboned a Beyer M260 for me and did a fantastic job. Quick turnaround time, mic sounded great and he was a nice guy to deal with.

User avatar
ubertar
ears didn't survive the freeze
Posts: 3775
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:20 pm
Location: mid-Atlantic US
Contact:

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by ubertar » Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:50 am

eeldip wrote:anyone ever try both.. i have an RCA varacoustic with a 60 year old ribbon in it. just noticed it gets a little uh.. stressed out at unacceptably quiet levels (acoustic guitar at 8 inches is too close).
I have a varacoustic too, and the same thing started happening. I opened it up and found the ribbon had gone a bit slack. It's not that hard to loosen the clamp at the top that holds the ribbon and pull it tighter (but not too tight). It sounded fine after that. It's worth a try-- the worst that could happen is you'll need to send it to get re-ribboned and you were planning on doing that anyway.

If you do decide to have work done on it, you may as well get a new transformer while you're at it. According to Dave Royer, the varacoustic has a very good element but a crappy transformer.

User avatar
swingdoc
tinnitus
Posts: 1199
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Arlington, WA

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by swingdoc » Tue Feb 01, 2005 11:39 am

you may wish to pm me before sending mics to Mr Sank.

User avatar
eeldip
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2139
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 5:10 pm
Location: NoPo

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by eeldip » Tue Feb 01, 2005 11:48 am

ubertar wrote:
eeldip wrote:anyone ever try both.. i have an RCA varacoustic with a 60 year old ribbon in it. just noticed it gets a little uh.. stressed out at unacceptably quiet levels (acoustic guitar at 8 inches is too close).
I have a varacoustic too, and the same thing started happening. I opened it up and found the ribbon had gone a bit slack. It's not that hard to loosen the clamp at the top that holds the ribbon and pull it tighter (but not too tight). It sounded fine after that. It's worth a try-- the worst that could happen is you'll need to send it to get re-ribboned and you were planning on doing that anyway.

If you do decide to have work done on it, you may as well get a new transformer while you're at it. According to Dave Royer, the varacoustic has a very good element but a crappy transformer.
this is the kinda advice i like to hear!

ok. now i fuck wit it.

User avatar
aurelialuz
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2012
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 10:46 am
Location: portland, or.

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by aurelialuz » Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:02 pm

...
Last edited by aurelialuz on Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"While every effort has been made to ensure optimum sound quality, priority has been given to historic content and importance."

User avatar
soundguy
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 12:50 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by soundguy » Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:10 pm

I used sank to do three mics. got them back and thought they sounded funny, so I sent them back to him (he was really great abou tthe whole affair) he said they were fine, I got them back and they still sounded funny. I wound up eventually having AEA redo them and they sound great now. Ive used AEA for reribboning for about 8 years with no problems, after reading the praise up here for sank I gave him a shot and thats my story.

dave
http://www.glideonfade.com
one hundred percent discrete transistor recording with style and care.

tylerbcrawford
gettin' sounds
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 2:29 pm

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by tylerbcrawford » Sun Feb 06, 2005 3:12 pm

Does anyone know if AEA will re ribbon a beyer m260? I was going to get Sank to do it but there seems to be alot of mixed feedback.
Lo-fi Super Fun Pop - the port city allstars

User avatar
prince turbo lung
pushin' record
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 8:32 am
Location: nashville, tn.

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by prince turbo lung » Sun Feb 06, 2005 3:19 pm

i have had ribbon mics done by sank...my opinion is mixed. the beyers came back looking great in a timely matter..but their sound changed. i have original m160s and sank m160s. the sank mics have a more open top end/ more detailed top end..brighter overall. the originals are darker (in a good way) and have a bigger low end. sank does top notch work but definately tailors the sound in his own way, so be prepared for your mic to sound slightly different.
its on like donkey kong!!!!

User avatar
tiger vomitt
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2077
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:38 am
Location: brooklyn, NY
Contact:

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by tiger vomitt » Sun Feb 06, 2005 11:08 pm

i thought that sank doesnt replace beyer ribbons with the same type of ribbon.

wouldnt that explain why they sound different after he's done his thing?

tylerbcrawford
gettin' sounds
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 2:29 pm

Re: dooley or sank? reribboning

Post by tylerbcrawford » Mon Feb 07, 2005 4:53 pm

tiger vomitt wrote:i thought that sank doesnt replace beyer ribbons with the same type of ribbon.

wouldnt that explain why they sound different after he's done his thing?
yeah he replaces them with RCA ribbons. for the beyer m260 it's replaced with the same ribbon as an rca dx77. and that's why I want to send it to sank but i have heard some things that make me hesitant.

Anyone else have any feed back about Stephen Sank?
Lo-fi Super Fun Pop - the port city allstars

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests