Liquid Channel

general questions, comments and ideas about recording, audio, music, etc.
joek1972
audio school graduate
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 12:11 pm

Liquid Channel

Post by joek1972 » Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:43 am

What's everyone's reaction to this piece of gear? Worth the $3000? Does it sound reasonably close to the original pieces of gear it's emulating? Does it sound better than the plugin versions of said gear? Discuss.

sonikbliss
buyin' a studio
Posts: 919
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by sonikbliss » Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:53 am


joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by joel hamilton » Wed Feb 09, 2005 12:12 pm

I wanted to hate it, and instead I wound up hating the drama surrounding it.

Quote me on that....

User avatar
joelpatterson
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1732
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 5:20 pm
Location: Albany, New York

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by joelpatterson » Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:27 pm

Joel Hamilton wrote:I wanted to hate it, and instead I wound up hating the drama surrounding it.

Quote me on that....
Oh shit! You didn't say "Simon says"!
Mountaintop Studios
~The Peak of Perfection~
Petersburgh NY 12138

mountaintop@taconic.net

User avatar
Rick Hunter
dead but not forgotten
Posts: 2022
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 7:22 am
Location: El Granada, Ca
Contact:

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by Rick Hunter » Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:57 pm

Joel Hamilton wrote:I wanted to hate it, and instead I wound up hating the drama surrounding it.

Quote me on that....

What do you think is better, an 1176 or a liquid channel? like if you can have only one. But the 1176 had a spear.

But...the liquid channel had nunchucks?

User avatar
@?,*???&?
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5804
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Just left on the FM dial
Contact:

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by @?,*???&? » Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:01 pm

Rick Hunter wrote:
Joel Hamilton wrote:I wanted to hate it, and instead I wound up hating the drama surrounding it.

Quote me on that....

What do you think is better, an 1176 or a liquid channel? like if you can have only one. But the 1176 had a spear.

But...the liquid channel had nunchucks?
Hey cool, another cryptic Rick Hunter comment...

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by joel hamilton » Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:09 pm

Here is a followup to the review I wrote:

I didnt buy the Liquid channel, even at the very, very reduced price they offer to the people who review stuff.

It simply did not fit the way I like to work. I like single use items.

The 8 zillion options did not really do anything for me, as I wound up just leaving the thing on the helios with the fairchild every single time I used it, if at all. I realized that I simply dont need, or want to go through 19 mic pre's to see "what is the best" foir a given source, ya know? I know what will work in my arsenal for pretty much anything, but that thing felt like a really amazing robot that wants to help you, even when you dont need any help, and it is just annoying. Like "here you go! I can do it! Hey look at me! I am a screwdriver now! Use me instead of the old craftsman you always use! Hey Look! Now I am a hammer! Awesome! that old estwing of yours can go in the trash now right!!!>!?!?!? Please!?!?! [sob]...[fizzle]"

Something like that....

If I did not have a bunch of choices already, I would consider getting a liquid channel. Maybe. I doubt it. The box is amazing, I still feel that way. The technology is amazing. So are spaceships and sharks and robot welding arms. I also think remote control sharks would be "amazing."

I realized this:

A screwdriver doesnt have to be amazing, it just needs to turn a screw to be useful.

User avatar
A.L.
buyin' a studio
Posts: 967
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 8:58 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by A.L. » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:01 pm

Jeff Robinson wrote:Hey cool, another cryptic Rick Hunter comment...
Jesus christ, shut the **** up.

You make shitty records and 're a dick on internet. Congratulations.

User avatar
Quest Poetics
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 8:16 pm
Location: Vancouver BC
Contact:

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by Quest Poetics » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:09 pm

But how is the megapixel LCD Screen...If that box can display all of my dirty Donkey porn then I'm signing up for 2...I'm so interested in that box but I just cant get over the negative hype...I unfortunately cant exactly demo the thing here in K.C. and I'm not about to go into it blindly...I dont have tons of options around my studio so I wouldn't mind having an all in one box, even if the purists spit and laugh at me...

If it sounds "MUSICIAL" at all to me when and if I demo the thing I'm going to grab one right away...Everyone may bitch and complain about how it doesn't do their 1176 or whatever exactly...I'm not looking for exact copies of great gear...I just wouldn't mind having a kick ass "Musical" signal chain...If it can deliver that, then I'll just make it do what I want it to...We'll see....


Peace!

User avatar
A.L.
buyin' a studio
Posts: 967
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 8:58 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by A.L. » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:18 pm

On topic.

Yeah Joel, I see your point...

it's the same thing, film vs video, tape vs DAW.

Instead of making decisions you're stuck second-guessing every choice and splitting hairs that don't need to be split.

When I make movies I shoot film... the limitations of film (pissing away money for every wasted frame) forces me to make choices and stick with them in both shooting and editing. This results in better work on my part because instead of tweaking every little thing and reshooting for every dumb irregularity I'm forced to focus: to make every shot the best it can be with what I have and consequenty knowing my limited range of equipment better. Screw 'post', get it right the first time, make a fuckin' movie, you know?

Excellent.

That doesn't mean digital cameras, etc. aren't rad but they don't stimulate me in the same way.

User avatar
nacho459
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Location: Pasadena USA
Contact:

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by nacho459 » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:20 pm

Hey Joel, I totally agree with you. I played with the Liquid Channel at AES to see what all the hype is and I realized when would I need more then a few flavors of mic pre. I don't want to sit in a session and say, "which sounds better the Neve or the API". I would rather have a sweet pair of pres and go with that.

Right now I have my 60's pre, my 70's pre, and my modern pre, a LA2A, a 1178, and a bunch of other crap I never use. Hey I would love a pair of Neve pres, but If I can't get it to sound good with what I have it's me, not my gear.

rimbaud234
gettin' sounds
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 2:30 pm

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by rimbaud234 » Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:21 pm

I have one and love mine.
Some people might not be able to differentiate between or need 40 different preamps, but having one box that does a compelling Fairchild, LA2A, 1176, Joe Meek, etc. compressor is pretty f-ing awesome.
Plus I can save presets from a session and control it from my DAW.
Oh wait, DAWs are digital. They suck. And so does the Liquid Channel 'cause it's digital too.
Nevermind, I hate mine. :wink:

User avatar
Mr. Dipity
carpal tunnel
Posts: 1528
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 11:29 am

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by Mr. Dipity » Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:08 am

A.L. wrote: Instead of making decisions you're stuck second-guessing every choice and splitting hairs that don't need to be split.
I would argue that this isn't the fault of the box, but a mind set cultivated to deal with the environment you are used to. My DAW is infinitely more complex than any pre/compressor simulator could be, and it takes discipline to focus on what I require from it, but I'm don't find myself constantly wading through my options, or meandering in indescision.

The way I see it, 'option anxiety' is an illusion. Douglas Adams creates a suitable metaphor in 'The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy', in his description of the room that the Earth was built in: the room is so big that it gives a better impression of infinity than the one infinity would. You always have infinite options: just because some box gives you a whole load more, doesn't mean that you didn't have an infinite amount of options to begin with.

That said, if someone would like to send me theirs, I would be happy to evaluate it's ablility to create option anxiety for a couple of years or so, until something newer comes along.

User avatar
Bear
deaf.
Posts: 1880
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 5:52 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Contact:

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by Bear » Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:26 am

A.L. wrote:
Jeff Robinson wrote:Hey cool, another cryptic Rick Hunter comment...
Jesus christ, shut the **** up.

You make shitty records and 're a dick on internet. Congratulations.
9.5
I am wangtacular.

tony moore
pushin' record
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 10:09 pm
Location: cincinnati, ohio
Contact:

Re: Liquid Channel

Post by tony moore » Thu Feb 10, 2005 5:26 am

I'm gonna wait for the plug in :-)

Fantastic post Joel!

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests