Autotune - ing the stars

Discussion on new albums, developing listening skills, critical listening to others' work, as well as TOMB members' MP3 links, online recording critiques

Moderator: cgarges

Post Reply
Professor T
pushin' record
Posts: 201
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 5:02 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Post by Professor T » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:21 am

RefD wrote:
vvv wrote:I just wanna mention that it was interesting reading through this thread, imagining that all of the bold parts are autotuned ...
time for a spoken word project!
I am listening to a book on CD. I swear it is autotuned. Spoken words. Tuned. You can hear it in the iTunes preview. Check out "The Woman Who Can't Forget" by Jill Price. It's not "mp3 artifacting" I'm listening to the actual CD.

It is friggen irritating -- it sounds like it's being read by a text-to-speech converter. Why, why, why?

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:05 pm

NPR just ran a segment on Kanye West's new CD, basically about the fact that he uses Autotune as a vocal effect on every track--the signature vocal sound of the record, if you will.

Which would be more cool if 6 million dance tunes hadn't already done that, but...
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

kdarr
buyin' gear
Posts: 577
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 3:43 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by kdarr » Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:07 pm

dwlb wrote:NPR just ran a segment on Kanye West's new CD, basically about the fact that he uses Autotune as a vocal effect on every track--the signature vocal sound of the record, if you will.

Which would be more cool if 6 million dance tunes hadn't already done that, but...
Yeah, I was a little disappointed when I heard the singles. I'm not a huge Kanye fan, but I like him okay, and he's much better when he's setting next year's overused hip-hop production trend (chipmunk samples), rather than following one from five years ago (egregious autotune).

At this point, production techniques in pop music are just fashion trends... you gotta have the newest Nikes or the newest smartphone, or a shit-ton of robot voice on your track if you want to seem cool. And all of those things are purely disposable.

[<|>]

User avatar
CraigS63
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 422
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Naperville, IL

Post by CraigS63 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 7:23 pm

dwlb wrote:NPR just ran a segment on Kanye West's new CD, basically about the fact that he uses Autotune as a vocal effect on every track--the signature vocal sound of the record, if you will.

Which would be more cool if 6 million dance tunes hadn't already done that, but...
I happened to see him on Letterman last night, it was pretty annoying. 10 Grammies? What?

User avatar
Brian
resurrected
Posts: 2254
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: corner of your eye
Contact:

Post by Brian » Tue Nov 25, 2008 8:21 pm

NARAS called me last year to re-up. I told them NO. When they asked why, I said," you only want rap, you have been rap-centric for too long, it just isn't more than an a novelty with backing tracks. I don't do rap and that makes Naras incompatible with my little operation. You give Grammys to acts that aren't even real routinely, and you tacitly support the worst practices in our industry. I'll keep my money and be illegitimate from now on.
What' a grammy for an engineer, a way to get famous? That's for artists.
Harumph!

User avatar
;ivlunsdystf
ghost haunting audio students
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:15 am
Location: The Great Frontier of the Southern Anoka Sand Plain
Contact:

Post by ;ivlunsdystf » Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:01 pm

dwlb wrote:NPR just ran a segment on Kanye West's new CD, basically about the fact that he uses Autotune as a vocal effect on every track--the signature vocal sound of the record, if you will.

Which would be more cool if 6 million dance tunes hadn't already done that, but...
I heard that but I was having a conversation at the same time. It sounded dilletante-ish anyway. Was it at all informative at our 'real recording enthusiast' level? I keep meaning to search for a rerun online.

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:16 pm

kdarr wrote:At this point, production techniques in pop music are just fashion trends... you gotta have the newest Nikes or the newest smartphone, or a shit-ton of robot voice on your track if you want to seem cool.
or gated canyon reverb on the snare drum...wait what?
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:17 pm

ysyrtypy wrote: Was it at all informative at our 'real recording enthusiast' level
Well, not partcularly, except to reinforce that the word "Autotune" is continuing to take root in the lay lexicon.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

dave watkins
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:25 pm
Location: Richmond VA
Contact:

Post by dave watkins » Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:51 am

sorry but i have got to be shameless here and bring this back:

in the spirit of this raging debate, and more importantly in the spirit of the holiday season i give you this thread:

http://messageboard.tapeop.com/viewtopi ... 981#516981

yes my freinds, goddamn autotune on a turkey. enjoy.

anyway... carry on as your were.
the tape is rolling, the ones and zeros are... um... ones and zeroing.
http://www.davewatkinsmusic.com

kdarr
buyin' gear
Posts: 577
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 3:43 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by kdarr » Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:30 am

dwlb wrote:
kdarr wrote:At this point, production techniques in pop music are just fashion trends... you gotta have the newest Nikes or the newest smartphone, or a shit-ton of robot voice on your track if you want to seem cool.
or gated canyon reverb on the snare drum...wait what?
Exactly, or a freaking Linndrum for that matter. But I dunno, the level of homogeneity seems even higher than it was in the 80's. And (no offense drummers) but a bad, dated drum sound is one thing... Processing every goddamned vocal track on every major release with the same gimmicky toy (even when the singers don't really need it) is just... yuck.

I dunno. Maybe I can deal with the gated verb more because I can only view the 80's through childhood nostalgia goggles.

(childhood nostalgia goggles look exactly like a ViewMaster, in case you were wondering.)

[<|>]

User avatar
Brian
resurrected
Posts: 2254
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: corner of your eye
Contact:

Post by Brian » Wed Nov 26, 2008 7:55 am

kdarr wrote:
dwlb wrote:
kdarr wrote:At this point, production techniques in pop music are just fashion trends... you gotta have the newest Nikes or the newest smartphone, or a shit-ton of robot voice on your track if you want to seem cool.
or gated canyon reverb on the snare drum...wait what?
Exactly, or a freaking Linndrum for that matter. But I dunno, the level of homogeneity seems even higher than it was in the 80's. And (no offense drummers) but a bad, dated drum sound is one thing... Processing every goddamned vocal track on every major release with the same gimmicky toy (even when the singers don't really need it) is just... yuck.

I dunno. Maybe I can deal with the gated verb more because I can only view the 80's through childhood nostalgia goggles.

(childhood nostalgia goggles look exactly like a ViewMaster, in case you were wondering.)

[<|>]
That is the BEST post I've read all year!

I'm telling you, they ain't just autotuning the vocals, they are autotuning EVERYTHING on some tracks.
It's beyond disgusting that the new criteria for professional level production has nothing to do with the skill of recording anything, and only has to do with autotuning and way-over-compression of everything. It makes music irritating. It's like putting strawberry cake icing on a 2"thick filet mignon medium rare.
yuk.
Harumph!

bluesman
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 681
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 9:01 am
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas

Post by bluesman » Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:57 am

A fellow gave me a cd of a band he liked..a local production. He asked me what I thought of the recording....I told him how it was....That the recording souded harsh & very over compressed, the vocals were spitty & extremely silibant & that the recording overall was painfully bright, very unsettling & difficult to listen to, not an enjoyable experience at all. He replied that these were the very qualities that he admired about the recording. His feeling was that the band did these things intentionally as part of the message in their music....!

So....who's right???? Leo Fender never intended for his amplifiers to be turned all the way up to 10 either.

It makes me wonder why I gave up drinking, just when I was getting good at it!
"The digital future sucks the boils off my white ass." McHugh

User avatar
JGriffin
zen recordist
Posts: 6739
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
Contact:

Post by JGriffin » Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:06 am

bluesman wrote:A fellow gave me a cd of a band he liked..a local production. He asked me what I thought of the recording....I told him how it was....That the recording souded harsh & very over compressed, the vocals were spitty & extremely silibant & that the recording overall was painfully bright, very unsettling & difficult to listen to, not an enjoyable experience at all. He replied that these were the very qualities that he admired about the recording. His feeling was that the band did these things intentionally as part of the message in their music....!

So....who's right???? Leo Fender never intended for his amplifiers to be turned all the way up to 10 either.

Well, that's an excellent point. Different strokes and all.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."

"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno

All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/

rwc
resurrected
Posts: 2333
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:21 pm
Location: Bed Stuy, Brooklyn

Post by rwc » Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:12 am

Here is my take on robot sound.

When roboted, whether the performance was that good or not, doesn't matter as much.

Stuff I would NEVER let through unroboted, become not only tolerable, but good and usable when roboted. Obvious, glaring errors stick out without it, that once melodyne'd to robot, seem to disappear.

I think it is a gimmick because it hides how bad you are, not even because it's necessarily a desirable effect.

I have handed off sessions where this was going to be what half my time was spent on to coworkers. I know I've lost a couple of hundred a month for it, but it's worth it to me.
Real friends stab you in the front.

Oscar Wilde

Failed audio engineer & pro studio tech turned Component level motherboard repair store in New York

User avatar
Brian
resurrected
Posts: 2254
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: corner of your eye
Contact:

Post by Brian » Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:24 am

I totally agree, if the track is never going to be done better, I probably don't want to work with the group and hear that stuff all day for weeks. I have NEVER used autotune and I NEVER will, it's suicide to the craft, art, and future of talent.

alright bluesman, who was the engineer?
I'm dying to know.
Harumph!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests