Evaluating Mastering Reference
Moderator: cgarges
- Jay Reynolds
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:48 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
Evaluating Mastering Reference
I just got a reference cd back from a ME and there are major issues. Before I list them, I'd like to give a historical perspective:
1. I've used this ME before, including for my own product.
2. I generally refer my clients to this ME (I do project-level work out of my home studio).
3. In the past, I've been very happy with the work this ME does and have thought he could charge a lot more than he does.
4. This ME has recently moved from one studio to another. The room he originally worked in had a great mastering suite and he would let myself and/or clients sit in on the session. He now charges extra to sit in and I have yet to actually see what the new mastering setup is.
In the end, I decided to go with talent over gear. That being said, this reference CD has some glaring problems. On two of the songs I (and the clients) can hear a pretty drastic change in EQ about 60 seconds in. At first, when I heard it, it sounded like a high shelf at 8k getting about 3 db of boost. But, after checking it with Logic Pro's multi-meter plugin, I looks like a notch boost centered at 8k. Once it is in, the sound of the track is pretty brash, so I'm tempted to believe its not supposed to be there. I have double checked my final mixes and these EQ bumps are not present in them.
There is a third song where there is also a perceptible change in overall volume in the first 3 seconds of the song. I didn't put the multimeter on this one, but I suspect it is an EQ issue too.
These aren't the only issues, but I'm having trouble thinking of what to say about, for instance, the fact that a lot of the material has (to my ears) too much high-frequency EQ on it because I can't figure out if its really supposed to be there in the first place.
So first, I guess I'd love to hear from other ME's here about why these EQ bumps might be happening. I'm guessing that the EQ is supposed to be automated to change with each new song in the program and somehow, this automation has been moved relative to the audio files.
Secondly, I'd love to get an evaluation of how I'm thinking of approaching this ME. Normally, I would leave it to the client to discuss these matters. But, since this is so out of whack, I was planning on calling him myself tomorrow. I think the best starting point would be to say, "Hey, I'm not sure if I'm hearing what you intended. Is the EQ supposed to change mid-song on these two tracks?"
Sorry in advance if I put this in the wrong forum. I had it figured at a 50-50 split between Listening to Music and People Skills.
1. I've used this ME before, including for my own product.
2. I generally refer my clients to this ME (I do project-level work out of my home studio).
3. In the past, I've been very happy with the work this ME does and have thought he could charge a lot more than he does.
4. This ME has recently moved from one studio to another. The room he originally worked in had a great mastering suite and he would let myself and/or clients sit in on the session. He now charges extra to sit in and I have yet to actually see what the new mastering setup is.
In the end, I decided to go with talent over gear. That being said, this reference CD has some glaring problems. On two of the songs I (and the clients) can hear a pretty drastic change in EQ about 60 seconds in. At first, when I heard it, it sounded like a high shelf at 8k getting about 3 db of boost. But, after checking it with Logic Pro's multi-meter plugin, I looks like a notch boost centered at 8k. Once it is in, the sound of the track is pretty brash, so I'm tempted to believe its not supposed to be there. I have double checked my final mixes and these EQ bumps are not present in them.
There is a third song where there is also a perceptible change in overall volume in the first 3 seconds of the song. I didn't put the multimeter on this one, but I suspect it is an EQ issue too.
These aren't the only issues, but I'm having trouble thinking of what to say about, for instance, the fact that a lot of the material has (to my ears) too much high-frequency EQ on it because I can't figure out if its really supposed to be there in the first place.
So first, I guess I'd love to hear from other ME's here about why these EQ bumps might be happening. I'm guessing that the EQ is supposed to be automated to change with each new song in the program and somehow, this automation has been moved relative to the audio files.
Secondly, I'd love to get an evaluation of how I'm thinking of approaching this ME. Normally, I would leave it to the client to discuss these matters. But, since this is so out of whack, I was planning on calling him myself tomorrow. I think the best starting point would be to say, "Hey, I'm not sure if I'm hearing what you intended. Is the EQ supposed to change mid-song on these two tracks?"
Sorry in advance if I put this in the wrong forum. I had it figured at a 50-50 split between Listening to Music and People Skills.
Prog out with your cog out.
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
Re: Evaluating Mastering Reference
i think that's a great starting point. you probably want to scream at the guy "what the fuck did you do to my work???" i know i would, but taking a calm approach is always better, so just see what he has to say.superaction80 wrote: I think the best starting point would be to say, "Hey, I'm not sure if I'm hearing what you intended. Is the EQ supposed to change mid-song on these two tracks?"
and if you're not happy with the eq (or anything else) overall, don't be shy. say what you think. it's your record. well, ok, it's your clients record, but you can likely discuss it with the ME a lot more articulately than they can. i master a lot of stuff for a couple engineers and i'm always asking them "is it ok/too bright/too bassy/too loud/whatever?" and i really value their feedback.
any good ME should be super receptive to any criticism, and if they obviously fucked up they should go out of their way to fix everything and make you happy.
- Jay Reynolds
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:48 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 10890
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 1:26 am
- Location: Charlotte, NC
- Contact:
I don't know too many MEs who listen to the reference CDs after the job is done unless the client has something to say about it. That said, I've also never seen an ME "automate" any EQ except for one guy who I've seen bump a little upper mid to bring out a guitar solo a bit in the context of what he already had going.
If the guy is good, he'll be willing to do a revision for you. You can always ask if he automated something and tell him that if he did, you can hear it and if he didn't it sounds like he did. If the guy's cool, then he'll fix whatever you want him to fix, including making it less bright.
Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC
If the guy is good, he'll be willing to do a revision for you. You can always ask if he automated something and tell him that if he did, you can hear it and if he didn't it sounds like he did. If the guy's cool, then he'll fix whatever you want him to fix, including making it less bright.
Chris Garges
Charlotte, NC
- Jay Reynolds
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:48 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
He was cool. When I explained that I was hearing these EQ bumps, he said, "That ain't right". From my discussion with him, I understood that the EQ's are automated and something must have happened to the curves. I was even trying to keep things short, considering that I may not be hearing what he intended, but he did spend a moment on the phone with me to get my impressions (with a grain of salt, of course). My man is, if anything, a pro, which is why I like working with him.
Prog out with your cog out.
- Jay Reynolds
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:48 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
Update: my guy just called me to tell me that he's got another reference for the clients. He told me he heard the EQ issues that I had heard and that he checked the whole program once he'd fixed them. And he's not going to charge me for the revision. I'm not sure how to take this last part. He's never charged for revisions before, but usually I just ask for a coupe minor changes on a song or two, at the most. But maybe he just wants it to be clear that he's not going to spend hours on a cd for free without a good reason.
Prog out with your cog out.
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
-
- speech impediment
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
- Contact:
- Jay Reynolds
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:48 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
interesting. Is this because I didn't quibble with him about what he may or may not be charging the clients for? Would it be more indicative of a healthy relationship if I'd lead with, "What the fuck are you doing to my mixes?"subatomic pieces wrote:sounds like there are some really weird, passive agressive communication issues at work here. I don't know if it's because of you or your ME. But, the first thing that I'd do is find a ME that you feel comfortable discussing these things with.
Prog out with your cog out.
-
- speech impediment
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
- Contact:
probably. It would definitely be more indicative of a healthy relationship if you had just felt comfortable going to him and saying, "something is not right here. can you listen to this and tell me what's happening?" but, you were uneasy about that conversation for some reason. and, you're also pondering what he meant when he said that he wouldn't charge this time. I would have said something along the lines of, "well, you never have before and that's why I love you"...
it seems that it's anxiety about this situation that brought you to post this in the first place. Like I said, I don't know who's responsible or if you both are, but one way or another you've got communication problems with this guy. Just like any other relationship, this one will work better if you feel comfortable communicating with each other.
it seems that it's anxiety about this situation that brought you to post this in the first place. Like I said, I don't know who's responsible or if you both are, but one way or another you've got communication problems with this guy. Just like any other relationship, this one will work better if you feel comfortable communicating with each other.
- Jay Reynolds
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:48 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
not to speak for superaction, but i think it's totally natural to be uneasy about it. i don't think anyone likes telling someone else they're not happy with their work. i had a record i did mastered by someone everyone knows and it came back NOT AT ALL how i (or the artist) wanted it. the artist and i were both kinda freaked out and i was definitely feeling like "what the fuck did you do to my mixes????" but i stayed out of it, the artist politely said "i really want it to be a lot less aggressive...", the ME was cool, redid the whole thing, the second version was great.subatomic pieces wrote: but, you were uneasy about that conversation for some reason.
i dunno what my point is....i guess just that this ME is someone both the artist and i are friendly with, and we still were like "uhhhh how should we address this?"
- Jay Reynolds
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:48 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
You articulated that better than I could have. Perhaps taking it a step further, I like it better when, after mixing a song, I hear "We'd like the vocal more out front" as opposed to "That doesn't sound very good".MoreSpaceEcho wrote:not to speak for superaction, but i think it's totally natural to be uneasy about it. i don't think anyone likes telling someone else they're not happy with their work. i had a record i did mastered by someone everyone knows and it came back NOT AT ALL how i (or the artist) wanted it. the artist and i were both kinda freaked out and i was definitely feeling like "what the fuck did you do to my mixes????" but i stayed out of it, the artist politely said "i really want it to be a lot less aggressive...", the ME was cool, redid the whole thing, the second version was great.subatomic pieces wrote: but, you were uneasy about that conversation for some reason.
i dunno what my point is....i guess just that this ME is someone both the artist and i are friendly with, and we still were like "uhhhh how should we address this?"
Prog out with your cog out.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests