Chopin Waltz, Op. 64, No. 2 in C-Sharp Minor

Discussion on new albums, developing listening skills, critical listening to others' work, as well as TOMB members' MP3 links, online recording critiques

Moderator: cgarges

Post Reply

Which interpretation do you like best?

Rubenstein
1
20%
Horowitz
1
20%
Rachmaninoff
3
60%
 
Total votes: 5

XDigitalpostXGoldstar
audio school graduate
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:53 am
Contact:

Chopin Waltz, Op. 64, No. 2 in C-Sharp Minor

Post by XDigitalpostXGoldstar » Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:10 am

Here are three interpretations. I like Rachmaninoff best.

Chopin Waltz, Op. 64, No. 2 in C-Sharp Minor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDP5rOTp ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WpDH5zb ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SVW_O5D ... re=related


I think Rachmaninoff plays with genuine emotion and gets that is about a man and women in a relationship, with ups and downs.

Actually I forgot about this guy, I like it a lot also.

Paderewski Chopin Waltz 1917

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9ZxnObm ... re=related
PLACE THE AUDIO HOOK IN THE FIRST 5 SECONDS OF YOUR TRACK OR I MOVE TO NEXT ONE! [I have a short attention span & so does America] 1989, This was Digital Post next 2 Disney> http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... D=41802256

User avatar
Young Winston
ass engineer
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:23 pm
Location: Room 101

Post by Young Winston » Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:28 am

Didn't hook me in the first 5 seconds. I moved on.
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength

User avatar
Nick Sevilla
on a wing and a prayer
Posts: 5571
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
Contact:

Post by Nick Sevilla » Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:37 am

Young Winston wrote:Didn't hook me in the first 5 seconds. I moved on.
LOL

Chopin is not about the first 5 seconds. It will take you a lifetime to learn to appreciate his genius, unless you ave Polish blood.

Oh, and I also like the Paderewski interpretation the best.

Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.

XDigitalpostXGoldstar
audio school graduate
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:53 am
Contact:

Piano vs Guitar on Chopin

Post by XDigitalpostXGoldstar » Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:26 pm

Well they are not Rachmaninoff, but here are two interesting guitar versions of Chopin, Electric and classical guitar. I think Harmonic tapping of parts of this might proves interesting if it is doable. Anyway give a listen. Once the novelty wears off, it's not Rachmaninoff.

Is it the players comparatively? Or is piano just more expressive than guitar in it's ability to control dynamic volume? I think less compression on the electric guitar might be worth a try... :rockin:

Electric :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvMJ9AhBcjc

Classic Guitar:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzfmWzNU ... re=related

:worthy:
PLACE THE AUDIO HOOK IN THE FIRST 5 SECONDS OF YOUR TRACK OR I MOVE TO NEXT ONE! [I have a short attention span & so does America] 1989, This was Digital Post next 2 Disney> http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... D=41802256

Winstontaneous
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:37 am
Location: Berkeley, CA

Post by Winstontaneous » Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:44 pm

I like the Rachmaninoff best, too, though Art Tatum's version is pretty badass:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fylxor4z ... re=related

Rubinstein takes the middle of the road, which is how I've usually heard this piece done.

Fun stuff--I'm like this with Debussy. I obsessively collect his piano Preludes and Etudes; I must have at least 7 or 8 recordings of each. I'm a novice pianist, but it's great to hear what can be done!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests