hank to hendrix

Discussion on new albums, developing listening skills, critical listening to others' work, as well as TOMB members' MP3 links, online recording critiques

Moderator: cgarges

Post Reply
ampguy
buyin' a studio
Posts: 996
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:44 pm
Location: ca

hank to hendrix

Post by ampguy » Sun Mar 30, 2014 10:31 pm


Bro Shark
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 653
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: SF

Post by Bro Shark » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:29 pm

Vocals are way too loud.

ampguy
buyin' a studio
Posts: 996
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:44 pm
Location: ca

Thanks

Post by ampguy » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:37 pm

I'll do this one over with lower vocals. How are the harp and guitar?
Bro Shark wrote:Vocals are way too loud.

Bro Shark
re-cappin' neve
Posts: 653
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: SF

Re: Thanks

Post by Bro Shark » Thu Apr 03, 2014 10:58 am

ampguy wrote:I'll do this one over with lower vocals. How are the harp and guitar?
Definitely on par with the other songs you've posted. Actually maybe the vocals were too spiky. Did you use any compression?

ampguy
buyin' a studio
Posts: 996
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:44 pm
Location: ca

Re: Thanks

Post by ampguy » Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:53 pm

No compression, but part of the mix (fx send) went through a rack vocal delay that might have some in it.

I used to use an RNC 1/3 rack mount box, but didn't really like it. It's out of the chain for now.

I'm thinking perhaps harp/vocal tunes may need that compression.
Bro Shark wrote:
ampguy wrote:I'll do this one over with lower vocals. How are the harp and guitar?
Definitely on par with the other songs you've posted. Actually maybe the vocals were too spiky. Did you use any compression?

ampguy
buyin' a studio
Posts: 996
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:44 pm
Location: ca

lowered vocals

Post by ampguy » Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:46 pm


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests