Kudos to the AT 4033
-
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:18 am
- Location: Portland OR
- Contact:
Kudos to the AT 4033
They sound great!
Mine took a 3 foot fall last night (Gasp!) onto cement and came it back like a champion!
It still sounds great!
Mine took a 3 foot fall last night (Gasp!) onto cement and came it back like a champion!
It still sounds great!
Kyle
- loudmusic
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 4:46 am
- Location: athens, ga usa
- Contact:
Re: Kudos to the AT 4033
Mine has a big dent in the grill from a fall... it stilll sounds great. Another reason for a newbie to save up for one of these... They are pretty tough.
Marty
Marty
- Madness
- gimme a little kick & snare
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 1:06 pm
- Location: Nashville
- Contact:
Re: Kudos to the AT 4033
My first good mic! This mic got me thru for several years before I managed to buy several. The price has dropped since those days- it listed at around $750 back then, and I think I paid $495 from Caruso Music in CT- plug...
A great mic for someone who can't afford much but who needs something quality. AT is making great mics.
Phil
A great mic for someone who can't afford much but who needs something quality. AT is making great mics.
Phil
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 8876
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
- Location: NYC/Brooklyn
- Contact:
Re: Kudos to the AT 4033
You cant go wrong with a 4033. Unless you do go wrong.
Re: Kudos to the AT 4033
I have two of these mics. They're honest + .
Re: Kudos to the AT 4033
what about the 4050? I've heard the same of this mic aswell, how do they compair?
don't worry we don't need to track, we'll fix it later!
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 5:41 am
- Location: Germany - Old Europe
Re: Kudos to the AT 4033
I have dropped a 4033a from at least 3 ft. once and it didn't complain. I've never dropped a At 4050 but I've dropped a M160 from about 2 ft. and except for a little dent in the grill it wasn't harmed. I've seen a large diaphragm vacuum tube mics fall with it's stand from 5 ft and it wasn't broken. I guess from the experience that I've made so far a At 4050 would behave the same as a At 4033a would when you let it drop from let's say 3-4 ft.
It still would be a very good microphone and it still would not have the slight 2-3 KHz boost that the At 4033a has and it still would have three switchable pick up patterns.
But if you ask me don't drop it at all.
Max.
It still would be a very good microphone and it still would not have the slight 2-3 KHz boost that the At 4033a has and it still would have three switchable pick up patterns.
But if you ask me don't drop it at all.
Max.
Re: Kudos to the AT 4033
I've been using the 4040, which, if I'm not mistaken, replaced the 4033 in the AT catalog.
Great mic, reasonable priced. Clear crisp, responsive...blah, blah, blah. If you only have $300 to spend on a mic, then get the 4040.
The 4050 is virtually the same mic but has switchable patterns.
On the record I just made I used to 4040 almost exclusively for the home demos' vocals and then when I got to Chicago to make the record the producer used both the 4050 and a Blue Mouse depending on the tune. All sounded great and the 4050 held up brilliantly against the much more expensive Mouse.
I have dropped all of my mics and never had a problem. The producer drops everything and must own stock in Duct Tape. But everything keeps on truckin'
Great mic, reasonable priced. Clear crisp, responsive...blah, blah, blah. If you only have $300 to spend on a mic, then get the 4040.
The 4050 is virtually the same mic but has switchable patterns.
On the record I just made I used to 4040 almost exclusively for the home demos' vocals and then when I got to Chicago to make the record the producer used both the 4050 and a Blue Mouse depending on the tune. All sounded great and the 4050 held up brilliantly against the much more expensive Mouse.
I have dropped all of my mics and never had a problem. The producer drops everything and must own stock in Duct Tape. But everything keeps on truckin'
- just like honey
- studio intern
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 2:40 pm
- Location: PDX
Re: Kudos to the AT 4033
the 4040 did replace the 4033 for a short time... the 4033 is back as the "classic edition" and is $100 more now.
they arent the same mic, but damn close. supposedly the 4040 has an extened bump in the high end and a higher output... i own two 4033's and one 4040. they are pretty similar, probally identical in most ways, though i do like my 4033's better. i need to use them both at the same time, on the same source, to really get a feel of what the differnce is. havent used the 4040 on a session yet.
the 4050 is supposed to be the multi pattern version of the 4033, but i think it has a little more warmth to it.
j
they arent the same mic, but damn close. supposedly the 4040 has an extened bump in the high end and a higher output... i own two 4033's and one 4040. they are pretty similar, probally identical in most ways, though i do like my 4033's better. i need to use them both at the same time, on the same source, to really get a feel of what the differnce is. havent used the 4040 on a session yet.
the 4050 is supposed to be the multi pattern version of the 4033, but i think it has a little more warmth to it.
j
Re: Kudos to the AT 4033
A friend of mine has had 2 for many many years and swears by them.
Although when they were selling for $299, he did gripe about paying $700 apiece for them "way back when"....
Although when they were selling for $299, he did gripe about paying $700 apiece for them "way back when"....
Re: Kudos to the AT 4033
i have compared the 4033 and 4050 side by side.
The 4033 is like the SM57 of condensors, by which i mean it is really useful, always sounds good, but it really has its own sound. Not particularly transparent. I found it a little closed sounding, very focussed, not open. When you reach for this mic, you're reaching for a particular sound, and it's useful in a lot of places.
The 4050 is much more hi-fi, it's very transparent, and therefore useful on many different sources. You could use it on everything in a recording with no problematic buildup. It has very little character of its own, i would say. When you reach for this mic, you just want a nice, neutral picture of the source.
If you were going to have one good mic, i'd say you'd do better with the 4050. On the other hand, if you have a huge mic cabinet, you might have better things to use than the 4050, but you might still reach for the 4033 now and then (like a 57).
The 4033 is like the SM57 of condensors, by which i mean it is really useful, always sounds good, but it really has its own sound. Not particularly transparent. I found it a little closed sounding, very focussed, not open. When you reach for this mic, you're reaching for a particular sound, and it's useful in a lot of places.
The 4050 is much more hi-fi, it's very transparent, and therefore useful on many different sources. You could use it on everything in a recording with no problematic buildup. It has very little character of its own, i would say. When you reach for this mic, you just want a nice, neutral picture of the source.
If you were going to have one good mic, i'd say you'd do better with the 4050. On the other hand, if you have a huge mic cabinet, you might have better things to use than the 4050, but you might still reach for the 4033 now and then (like a 57).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests