Those electric tamburas are cool, but the place I saw one wanted a shit-ton of money for it. how much was yours?MoreSpaceEcho wrote:those angels get nothing. NOTHING!
rigs, no pix, but http://www.rohdelikat.com/deafanddear.htm
first song, the 'chorus'. it probably doesn't sound that amazing in context with the 400 million other things i stupidly thought needed to be in this song, but solo'd it was pretty great.
a variation on this trick:
i have an electronic tambura, yunno just a drone box basically, runs on batteries, i put that on my chair, mic'd it from about a foot away, stood off to the side and spun the chair around. that's on the song 'laudanum', which is also up on our site somewhere. dunno how apparent it is....i think you can hear it on the break between the first and second verses...
Post Your Coolest Recording Gimic or Trick
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6686
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6686
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
thanks man. alas the only way you'll hear it solo'd is if you come over my house and dig through the backups for that record...which you are of course welcome to do...i'll make coffee...ipressrecord wrote: You are my hero. Awesome. I want to hear this solo'd, too!
anyway, i don't want to go back to work so i'm gonna continue to ramble here...on track 7 from that same link, we ran one of the vocal tracks out to a speaker, with an acoustic guitar right in front of it, tuned to the key of the song, actually it was probably just tuned all to "C", but anyway we just mic'd up the guitar and recorded that back in. pretty standard trick, the ol' resonant acoustic.
i think for that same song we tried recording the vox with my singer's head in a dryer. haha. great IDEA, sounded terrible though.
what else i got....oh, as mentioned elsewhere today...play a guitar with a soft cloth instead of a pick...makes for a lovely texture...
hhmmm...wine glass, i've played that on loads of songs...another lovely sound
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
We've done the "small guitar amp in the dryer" thing, sounds good. I also did a vocal on my last record with my head in a bowling locker. Drove the bass player nuts--as we were mixing he kept saying, "let's strip the ambience off that vocal," and I kept grinning and saying, "can't."MoreSpaceEcho wrote:i think for that same song we tried recording the vox with my singer's head in a dryer. haha. great IDEA, sounded terrible though.
He had to eventually resign himself to the idea that I wanted it to sound that way. Sometimes he needs a little push.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
For GREATLY exaggerated FAT, WARM, THICK, old-school analog BLISS mixdown which greatly accentuates the true virtues of analog saturation about tenfold:
Pioneer RT-701/707 (yes, quarter track), NO recal of the factory calibration (sounds crazy, huh?), 3.75ips (YES, 3.75ips), dbx I (yep, noise reduction, and NOT Dolby), Emtec/Basf/RMG 468, +5db peaks, "eq" and "bias" settings set to "hi" (or, the OUT settings).
I know this sounds like heresy, and a lot of people probably wouldn't even be able to bring themselves to try it because it goes against all the "right" way to do things. Sure, high end is slightly rolled off (what slow speed analog isn't?); sure, it's not "accurate"...BUT, it sounds AMAZING on the right material. A good description is all the analog attributes everyone loves and states they want amplified by about 30 times on the verge of being overbearing. No easier way to obtain highly exaggerated analog warmth and low end thickness and compression than by slowing the tape speed down and slamming a capable tape as in the above example. If your mix sounds "empty" or has too much "space", this can work wonders.
Pioneer RT-701/707 (yes, quarter track), NO recal of the factory calibration (sounds crazy, huh?), 3.75ips (YES, 3.75ips), dbx I (yep, noise reduction, and NOT Dolby), Emtec/Basf/RMG 468, +5db peaks, "eq" and "bias" settings set to "hi" (or, the OUT settings).
I know this sounds like heresy, and a lot of people probably wouldn't even be able to bring themselves to try it because it goes against all the "right" way to do things. Sure, high end is slightly rolled off (what slow speed analog isn't?); sure, it's not "accurate"...BUT, it sounds AMAZING on the right material. A good description is all the analog attributes everyone loves and states they want amplified by about 30 times on the verge of being overbearing. No easier way to obtain highly exaggerated analog warmth and low end thickness and compression than by slowing the tape speed down and slamming a capable tape as in the above example. If your mix sounds "empty" or has too much "space", this can work wonders.
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6686
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
oh yeah...playing stuff back half speed off tape is another classic...half speed and backwards is usually even better...
...if i don't change the tape in my namesake for a really long time it gets all stretched and horrible sounding, gets all pitchy and crazy, probably NOT what you want on the lead vocal, but it's great as a really ear-grabbing effect in the right spot. that's made a couple records over the years....
...easy to do on a computer: take your lead vocal, reverse it. put reverb on it, set the verb to 100% wet, render that as its own track. then reverse that and put it under your regular vocal. you'll probably have to fiddle with the time a little bit on the reverb track, but now you have the reverb anticipating the real vocal. good in reasonable doses.
want some nice, melodic ambience? find a really really long reverb (i like the longest one on ye olde midiverb, but whatever will work) preferably not too bright, and set up a send from the vocal. then work that send knob dub style only on occasional sustained vowel sounds. presto. works a treat. yes i stole this trick from fucking pearl jam ('even flow', the very top of the second verse), i ain't ashamed.
...if i don't change the tape in my namesake for a really long time it gets all stretched and horrible sounding, gets all pitchy and crazy, probably NOT what you want on the lead vocal, but it's great as a really ear-grabbing effect in the right spot. that's made a couple records over the years....
...easy to do on a computer: take your lead vocal, reverse it. put reverb on it, set the verb to 100% wet, render that as its own track. then reverse that and put it under your regular vocal. you'll probably have to fiddle with the time a little bit on the reverb track, but now you have the reverb anticipating the real vocal. good in reasonable doses.
want some nice, melodic ambience? find a really really long reverb (i like the longest one on ye olde midiverb, but whatever will work) preferably not too bright, and set up a send from the vocal. then work that send knob dub style only on occasional sustained vowel sounds. presto. works a treat. yes i stole this trick from fucking pearl jam ('even flow', the very top of the second verse), i ain't ashamed.
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
Don't be ashamed, it's a great trick.
In that same vein, lately I've been ripping off Radiohead's trick of sending a single syllable of a vocal to a really short delay with lots of feedback for a sustained ringy note of just that one bit of the vocal. I know RH aren't the only ones to do that, but that's the quickest obvious example.
In that same vein, lately I've been ripping off Radiohead's trick of sending a single syllable of a vocal to a really short delay with lots of feedback for a sustained ringy note of just that one bit of the vocal. I know RH aren't the only ones to do that, but that's the quickest obvious example.
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
Somewhere in my box of old tapes is about 20 minutes of an electric oscillating fan mic'd in stereo, run through a flanger with no sweep and lots of feedback, some short echo, and a little chorus for good measure. It was a great drone by itself, but it got really interesting when I tapped various things in the room - the effects managed to mask any of the actual sounds being made, and instead turned everything into the fattest, heaviest jaw harp you could imagine.
-- There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary, and those who don't --
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6686
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
explain yourself newcomer!
seriously. this sounds cool but i'm dim so i'm not following what exactly you did. the micing the fan bit i get. it's the tapping things in the room bit i'm confused about. help me out.
some more dumb shit....put one mic on a guitar amp as usual, take another one and move it around over the course of the take. i mean wave it around like a crazy person. record to separate tracks, pan them on top of each other or hard l and r. see what happens.
on a similar note, there was some track on some song where i ran it out to a guitar amp, and my singer and i both had a mic in hand and waved them around over the course of the take. we looked like idiots. interpretive dancing idiots. no idea if that actually got used, but it's a cool idea.
that thing i posted earlier about the vocal through the speaker with the acoustic guitar in front of it....that wasn't what i did at all, i just remembered. it was a floor tom in front of the amp, laid on its side, mic on the resonant head. i could never get the acoustic thing to work actually, always too much of the direct sound. anybody have any success with that idea?
seriously. this sounds cool but i'm dim so i'm not following what exactly you did. the micing the fan bit i get. it's the tapping things in the room bit i'm confused about. help me out.
some more dumb shit....put one mic on a guitar amp as usual, take another one and move it around over the course of the take. i mean wave it around like a crazy person. record to separate tracks, pan them on top of each other or hard l and r. see what happens.
on a similar note, there was some track on some song where i ran it out to a guitar amp, and my singer and i both had a mic in hand and waved them around over the course of the take. we looked like idiots. interpretive dancing idiots. no idea if that actually got used, but it's a cool idea.
that thing i posted earlier about the vocal through the speaker with the acoustic guitar in front of it....that wasn't what i did at all, i just remembered. it was a floor tom in front of the amp, laid on its side, mic on the resonant head. i could never get the acoustic thing to work actually, always too much of the direct sound. anybody have any success with that idea?
Run a send from a guitar or non-percussion instrument into a trigger input on the D4. Tweak the trigger parameters so it retriggers as quickly as possible and follows the dynamics of the input signal. Assign that trigger to a cymbal through some combination of distortion and reverb for a crazy sound I can only call "sheen". Or use a kick or tom sound for something similar to a motorcycle or muscle car revving to the music.
lie an amp on the floor pointing at the ceiling and close mic it.
Hang a mic from the ceiling and let it swing back and forth over the amp.
when they are panned center you get a cool physical phasing effect.
Try it with more than one swinging mic for weird panned phasing.
alway keep the close mic center and pan teh other mics as hard left and right
as you want.
Hang a mic from the ceiling and let it swing back and forth over the amp.
when they are panned center you get a cool physical phasing effect.
Try it with more than one swinging mic for weird panned phasing.
alway keep the close mic center and pan teh other mics as hard left and right
as you want.
-
- pushin' record
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 11:57 pm
that sounds so amazingMoreSpaceEcho wrote:those angels get nothing. NOTHING!
rigs, no pix, but http://www.rohdelikat.com/deafanddear.htm
first song, the 'chorus'. it probably doesn't sound that amazing in context with the 400 million other things i stupidly thought needed to be in this song, but solo'd it was pretty great.
a variation on this trick:
i have an electronic tambura, yunno just a drone box basically, runs on batteries, i put that on my chair, mic'd it from about a foot away, stood off to the side and spun the chair around. that's on the song 'laudanum', which is also up on our site somewhere. dunno how apparent it is....i think you can hear it on the break between the first and second verses...
I was going to suggest this same thing, except I use it on guitar solos too.MoreSpaceEcho wrote:
...easy to do on a computer: take your lead vocal, reverse it. put reverb on it, set the verb to 100% wet, render that as its own track. then reverse that and put it under your regular vocal. you'll probably have to fiddle with the time a little bit on the reverb track, but now you have the reverb anticipating the real vocal. good in reasonable doses.
-
- alignin' 24-trk
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:42 am
- Location: Lancaster, PA
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests