what is figure-8 ambient sound sensitivity?

Recording Techniques, People Skills, Gear, Recording Spaces, Computers, and DIY

Moderators: drumsound, tomb

Post Reply
dumbangel
pushin' record
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:41 pm
Location: Paris

what is figure-8 ambient sound sensitivity?

Post by dumbangel » Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:15 am

Omni is 100%

cardioid is 33%

hyper-cardioid is 25%

How about figure-8?

drumsound
zen recordist
Posts: 7494
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Bloomington IL
Contact:

Post by drumsound » Sun Oct 21, 2007 1:51 pm

I don't understand your figures.

Max
takin' a dinner break
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 5:41 am
Location: Germany - Old Europe

Post by Max » Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:10 pm

Are you talking about off-axis sensitivity? A figure of 8 mic should have 0% at 90 degrees to the mic's main pick up axis.

dumbangel
pushin' record
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:41 pm
Location: Paris

Post by dumbangel » Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:58 pm

Omni mics are sensitive to sounds coming from ALL the axises in space around them. (front, back, up, down, sides, etc?)

Cardioid mics are sensitive to sounds coming from only 33% of these axises, etc?

I don't know the ratio for figure-8.

philbo
suffering 'studio suck'
Posts: 469
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:43 pm
Contact:

Post by philbo » Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:55 pm

Putting a single number on mic pickup polar patterns is sort of useless.

It's like asking how bright the sun will shine tomorrow - - in the shadow of the moon, it'll be 0% bright, but in the plains, it'll be 40%t. And if you are on Mercury, it'll be 97%.

The pickup of a mic, from a given direction, for a given frequency, will be described by it's polar plot diagram. This is a 3D array of values. One dimension is the angle of the sound source relative to the mic diaphragm. Another is the frequency. The 3rd is the amount of attenuation that sound will have, relative to a 1 KHz sound whose source is directly in front of the diaphragm.

The reason polar plots are used is because a single number is just not sufficient to describe the pickup pattern. Dumbing it down to a single number is misleading at best.
________
EXPERT INSURANCE
Last edited by philbo on Sun Mar 20, 2011 12:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

dumbangel
pushin' record
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:41 pm
Location: Paris

Post by dumbangel » Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:32 am

I read these figures in this thread:

http://messageboard.tapeop.com/viewtopi ... ensitivity

don't know where the author found them originally. Or did he make them up?

User avatar
red cross
buyin' gear
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 4:43 am
Location: The Far East

Post by red cross » Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:22 am

dumbangel wrote:Omni mics are sensitive to sounds coming from ALL the axises in space around them. (front, back, up, down, sides, etc?)

Cardioid mics are sensitive to sounds coming from only 33% of these axises, etc?

I don't know the ratio for figure-8.
Not really as simple as that. Omnis tend to be directional at high frequencies too. And the off axis freq response of various cardiod microphones has quite a large effect on how they sound as well.

joel hamilton
zen recordist
Posts: 8876
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
Location: NYC/Brooklyn
Contact:

Post by joel hamilton » Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:01 pm

I am 100% sure this will never help me make a better record.

:)

:shock: :roll: :?:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: digitaldrummer, drumsound and 97 guests