That's the dillio. It's not much bigger, and it has loads more capabilities... It's certainly portable, and you can actually record with it, should you wish. I have an Mbox2 Mini, and I really dig it... The micro makes me think that digidesign is panicked about something... I gotta wonder what...syrupcore wrote:For 50 bucks more, I'd rather get a mini.
Mbox 2 Micro YEAH RIGHT!!!
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 8876
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:10 pm
- Location: NYC/Brooklyn
- Contact:
price aside, I am glad it exists. I like to have choices in the marketplace, of which there are more than EVER. There are 50 illion times the number of pre's, ways to record, microphones.... everything to do with recording, really... more than ever before, and I love it. I like that we all have the option to get whatever the hell we want, even if this thing seems retarded to you, it may be perfect for me. I probably would just get a mini, but maybe I would just get this litle dongle and keep it in my laptop case. That way if I was at a session, working on an HD rig, and I needed to to some bounces to burn a listener for a session player that was leaving before we would be totally done, my assistant could do it right on the laptop.or maybe some editing to be done on a song while I am mixing something else ? Of course, that sort of situation has been dealt with just fine with my old 1st gen Mbox, and a laptop, and LE7.1, but this little thing is kind of an awesome way to do that sort of thing and not even need to find a place to put the Mbox or the Mini... My assistant could be editing , sitting on the couch comfortably...
I am just glad that the companies keep making things for us to choose from. WHether we buy it or not remains to be seen , of course....
I am just glad that the companies keep making things for us to choose from. WHether we buy it or not remains to be seen , of course....
-
- suffering 'studio suck'
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:18 pm
- Location: NYC
- MichaelAlan
- tinnitus
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 9:21 am
- Location: Passing under Sleep's dark and silent gate
- Contact:
-
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:04 am
I don?t use protools, but it?s still interesting for me. here?s a quote form unicornation, perhaps this helps anyone around here.
jrdmcdnld wrote:I found a workaround to get audio into PTLE directly from my 828mkII.
I took a screen video in case anyone is interested in this. It works well, but I haven't tested the latency of overdubbing factor yet. Hopefully I can come up with a workaround for that too.
Basically, you use JackOSX's audio server and VST plugin wrapped as RTAS to access the 828mkII (or any audio interface). As I've found out, the latency has to match in the PTLE session and JackOSX server (1024 in this case) otherwise there are bad audio artifacts.
Enjoy.
http://www.savefile.com/files/1156203
(there is no sound in the vid)
-Jay
-
- suffering 'studio suck'
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:18 pm
- Location: NYC
Will this work with any MOTU device, like the MOTU Traveller, and will it work in PT 7.3.1, not just 6.9?vier-personen wrote:I don?t use protools, but it?s still interesting for me. here?s a quote form unicornation, perhaps this helps anyone around here.
jrdmcdnld wrote:I found a workaround to get audio into PTLE directly from my 828mkII.
I took a screen video in case anyone is interested in this. It works well, but I haven't tested the latency of overdubbing factor yet. Hopefully I can come up with a workaround for that too.
Basically, you use JackOSX's audio server and VST plugin wrapped as RTAS to access the 828mkII (or any audio interface). As I've found out, the latency has to match in the PTLE session and JackOSX server (1024 in this case) otherwise there are bad audio artifacts.
Enjoy.
http://www.savefile.com/files/1156203
(there is no sound in the vid)
-Jay
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests