Maybe it's a quality control thing. The two I have listened to were just plain noisy. The noise on the one I helped track with wasn't so noticeable when using just the preamp with a mic that had a good strong signal, but when it was used to submix drums, taking 4 mics and outputting one signal, it was a fizzy mess.Mradyfist wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm not really sure why everybody here thinks Behringer mixers are so noisy.
How are Behringer Mixers?
not to worry, just keep tracking....
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:20 pm
- Location: Twin Cities, MN
- Contact:
I suppose that's possible. People with problems are always louder than people without. Also, maybe it's a size issue? I don't know that much about analog electronics, but for reference the Behringer pre I used for the test was in the baby mixer, which had (I believe) 2 pres total. Could it be that the larger Behringer mixers are underpowered or trying to pull too much from the power supply, or does that only affect headroom?Randy wrote: Maybe it's a quality control thing. The two I have listened to were just plain noisy. The noise on the one I helped track with wasn't so noticeable when using just the preamp with a mic that had a good strong signal, but when it was used to submix drums, taking 4 mics and outputting one signal, it was a fizzy mess.
Also, I do know that most Behringers use a switching power supply (which is usually noisy in RF), and the little ones (like the one I tested) have external inline boxes while the larger ones (like the 12-channel one I have) put the power supply in the case, with just an IEC plug going to the back.
Has anybody compared the noise levels between a Behringer with an internal power supply, and a Behringer without?
- weatherbox
- re-cappin' neve
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:59 am
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
- inverseroom
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5031
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 8:37 am
- Location: Ithaca, NY
- Contact:
I think that Behringer mixers are noisy because my Behringer mixer is noisy. If yours is nice and quiet, whoopee for you, but that doesn't mean mine is also quiet.Mradyfist wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm not really sure why everybody here thinks Behringer mixers are so noisy.
I will say that their rackmount line mixer, the RX16something, is actually fairly quiet and sounds OK.
This shouldn't even be debatable! Behringer makes horrible stuff. It's cheap and breakes easily. If it works, it usually barely does the job. Sound harsh to you? I have a good sounding Soundtracs mixer in my studio and my friend has a Behringer Mixer in his. All his recordings sound noisy, thin, and full of terrible artifacts from the on board effects. I cannot listen to these recordings. If the mixer were to be used in such a way that it would be moved around, it would surely break.
Derrick
We have a pool... and a pond. Pond's good for you though.
- The Real MC
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:50 am
- Location: Tranquil secluded country
- Contact:
In addition to chronic failure rates and poor quality mic preamps, Behringers have the most useless EQs on the planet. When you cut or boost, the spectrum across the affected bandwidth is not uniform - you can hear uneven harmonic distribution. Couple that with bandwidth that is too wide and you can't attenuate a problem resonance without sacrificing something detrimental. Boosting the EQs has no color at all.
The only good EQ on a Behringer mixer is the low cut switch.
The only good EQ on a Behringer mixer is the low cut switch.
- The Real MC
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:50 am
- Location: Tranquil secluded country
- Contact:
That is a given with ANY line mixer. Line mixers operate at unity gain because they are designed to work with +4dB inputs (that's *LINE* level) and do not require a 60dB mic preamp.inverseroom wrote:I will say that their rackmount line mixer, the RX16something, is actually fairly quiet and sounds OK.
Noise, distortion, bandwidth, and the like are much less of an issue with unity gain preamp than they are with 60dB preamps. So yes, *ANY* line mixer will be quiet and pristine. That doesn't put a saving grace on Behringer in my book.
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:20 pm
- Location: Twin Cities, MN
- Contact:
I mostly like discussing Behringer because of how angry people get over it. I noticed nobody addressed my question; has anybody compared Behringers with internal power supplies to Behringers with external power supplies? And as a reference for noise, I run sound over at my church, which has a Mackie 24:8. THAT thing is noisy; I have a policy of only bussing channels that I'm going to use, because even with the faders down there's a noticeable amount of hiss added with each channel bussed to the master fader. And I know this isn't a gain structure issue, because I installed the system myself. My Behringer MX3242X doesn't put out anywhere near this much noise from the line amps; I always zeroed it out with everything bussed to the main mix for quick setup.
Again, I'd like to raise the possibility that Behringer's older MX series was usable, albeit not great sounding. Reliability on my MX has been great; If anybody here has heard of the Mifflin Street Block Party (kind of like Mardi Gras in Madison WI, 20,000 drunken frat kids crammed into two city blocks worth of street), my MX did two tours of duty there, and every knob and fader still works great. Every UB series mixer I've used has had problems with the faders in a smoke-free studio setting, so I'm willing to concede to anybody who says they're shit for reliability.
This is the problem you run into when asking about something as generic as an entire brand of mixers. Behringer has at least three distinct lines of mixers, two of which I tried, one which was good and one which was bad. I'm not going to claim that every Mackie product is noisy because the one I used was noisy, especially since I think Mackie's stuff has gone through a number of revisions since the one I use.
The Real MC, apparently not all line mixers are quiet and pristine, because the Mackie at my church can't mix more than 8 channels together without making enough noise to get on my nerves in a live setting. Again, this is even with the faders and preamps down; as far as I'm concerned, I've had just as much success with Behringer as with Mackie. With regards to Behringer EQs, I've never tried using them in anything other than a live setting. They worked alright for that, but I don't think I'd pick them over anything else I have available.
Again, I'd like to raise the possibility that Behringer's older MX series was usable, albeit not great sounding. Reliability on my MX has been great; If anybody here has heard of the Mifflin Street Block Party (kind of like Mardi Gras in Madison WI, 20,000 drunken frat kids crammed into two city blocks worth of street), my MX did two tours of duty there, and every knob and fader still works great. Every UB series mixer I've used has had problems with the faders in a smoke-free studio setting, so I'm willing to concede to anybody who says they're shit for reliability.
This is the problem you run into when asking about something as generic as an entire brand of mixers. Behringer has at least three distinct lines of mixers, two of which I tried, one which was good and one which was bad. I'm not going to claim that every Mackie product is noisy because the one I used was noisy, especially since I think Mackie's stuff has gone through a number of revisions since the one I use.
The Real MC, apparently not all line mixers are quiet and pristine, because the Mackie at my church can't mix more than 8 channels together without making enough noise to get on my nerves in a live setting. Again, this is even with the faders and preamps down; as far as I'm concerned, I've had just as much success with Behringer as with Mackie. With regards to Behringer EQs, I've never tried using them in anything other than a live setting. They worked alright for that, but I don't think I'd pick them over anything else I have available.
- trodden
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5698
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 8:21 am
- Location: C-attle
- Contact:
yeah, or the 1202 with the mid freg eq as well. mine has seen the most brutal touring/road conditions and is still going strong after 8 years. I use it to route synths/samplers/effects for my live set up. its been dropped numerous times and at least 50 gallons of sweat and beer dumped on it.inverseroom wrote:Get a used Mackie 1202, the original one.
My electronica duo has a Behringer powered mixer and it's noisy as hell, and very thin sounding. It was a waste of money.
and at least 10 of those 50 gallons are from one show in drinkin' lincoln, Nebraska.
-
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:20 pm
- Location: Twin Cities, MN
- Contact:
Hmm, that's interesting to note. What model is it?A-Barr wrote: My noisy Behr has an external psu, if that helps any.
Last edited by Mradyfist on Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 8:08 pm
- Location: little rock, arkansas
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests