Anyone mixing to Cassette?
Anyone mixing to Cassette?
Not a late april fools I assure you!
My client loves what his fourtrack does to his demos. Can't quite get that sound from the full album mixes. He wants to try dumping them to his 4 track. I'm not too keen on the idea, as I will have to convert the mixes back to digital through my 002, and its one extra conversion. On the other hand I'm willing to give it a try as it may add more than what the 002 takes away.
He's dropping the 4-track off next week for me. In the meantime I dug out my old Sony Professional WM-D6C recordable walkman
http://picnic.ciao.com/de/21770090.jpg
I've always loved this portable machine. It has the best tape heads I've ever seen in a cassette recorder.
So I've hooked this up as a hardware insert in pro tools. Sending ready mixed songs to it is a bit problematic as the levels are too hot for it.
I suppose I could put my Tfpro P2 before it and pad the inputs.
I figure the mechanism in this machine is better than the 4-track, and i'll have double the tape diameter from it.
My meandering question/musing is therefore does anyone here regularly mixdown to cassette? any tips?
I know Portishead have done for their new album "Third"
My client loves what his fourtrack does to his demos. Can't quite get that sound from the full album mixes. He wants to try dumping them to his 4 track. I'm not too keen on the idea, as I will have to convert the mixes back to digital through my 002, and its one extra conversion. On the other hand I'm willing to give it a try as it may add more than what the 002 takes away.
He's dropping the 4-track off next week for me. In the meantime I dug out my old Sony Professional WM-D6C recordable walkman
http://picnic.ciao.com/de/21770090.jpg
I've always loved this portable machine. It has the best tape heads I've ever seen in a cassette recorder.
So I've hooked this up as a hardware insert in pro tools. Sending ready mixed songs to it is a bit problematic as the levels are too hot for it.
I suppose I could put my Tfpro P2 before it and pad the inputs.
I figure the mechanism in this machine is better than the 4-track, and i'll have double the tape diameter from it.
My meandering question/musing is therefore does anyone here regularly mixdown to cassette? any tips?
I know Portishead have done for their new album "Third"
- blackdiscoball
- suffering 'studio suck'
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:32 pm
- ;ivlunsdystf
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:15 am
- Location: The Great Frontier of the Southern Anoka Sand Plain
- Contact:
As the JV self-recordist that I am, I send stuff to a 4-track and sometimes an 8-track (both cassette) and then playback and record back into DAW. All the time. It does nice things for the sound. Tuning for later overdubs becomes a challenge, as pitch can vary within the song once it's been tainted by a cassette multitrack machine. That's half the fun, though.
I have also mixed from DAW direct to 2-track cassette and have generally hated the ensuing sound. That's my ears' experience, not yours.
I have also mixed from DAW direct to 2-track cassette and have generally hated the ensuing sound. That's my ears' experience, not yours.
-
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:30 pm
- Location: The US North Coast
- Contact:
-
- dead but not forgotten
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:22 am
- Location: Ramah, New Mexico
+1 on this possibility, FWIW.Andy Smash wrote:Eeew. Are you sure he actually likes the cassette format? Maybe what he really likes is the sound of the electronics in his 4-track.
It's easy to imitate that "sound" by sending a mix through something like a Tascam PE-40 in Bypass mode - there's really no noise added and in bypass you're not letting the EQ circuit f*&k up your mix. BTW, that little trick also works for trying to get a mic like the 4033 to sound a little darker like a 4047.
"The mushroom states its own position very clearly. It says, "I require the nervous system of a mammal. Do you have one handy?" Terrence McKenna
you might be able to do that as part of the mastering process. if you send it to tape after compressing you might be able to ride the whole mix hotter to the cassette and get more tape compression, avoid clipping, and and get a better signal to noise ratio. if you master/compress after the 4-track you might bring up a lot of noise.
but if that's not an option, just go for it.
i like mixing down to a 4 track... i still run the mics through a board and compress/limit stuff like crazy so i don't have to worry about clipping at the 4-track input. and it requires mixing a lot of stuff on the fly so you don't have to obsess later. i did the Gaye Blades 7" "I'd Brave Anything For You" like this with some $30 condenser mics and the tape op omni. they had a good time recording (because it's easy) and i'm pretty sure they were happy with the result.
http://www.bompstore.com/servlet/Detail?no=6968
http://www.myspace.com/thegayeblades
but if that's not an option, just go for it.
i like mixing down to a 4 track... i still run the mics through a board and compress/limit stuff like crazy so i don't have to worry about clipping at the 4-track input. and it requires mixing a lot of stuff on the fly so you don't have to obsess later. i did the Gaye Blades 7" "I'd Brave Anything For You" like this with some $30 condenser mics and the tape op omni. they had a good time recording (because it's easy) and i'm pretty sure they were happy with the result.
http://www.bompstore.com/servlet/Detail?no=6968
http://www.myspace.com/thegayeblades
-
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:30 pm
- Location: The US North Coast
- Contact:
-
- ass engineer
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:57 pm
- Location: SLC, UT
because tape is inconsistent & you'll never get it to match up to the digital files (tape machine runs slow/fast... even if you have a super tuned tape machine I doubt that you'd get the files to line up)qball wrote:Why not send a squashed mix to tape, then mix that back in with the un-squashed original to taste?
-
- ass engineer
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:57 pm
- Location: SLC, UT
Got me there.JohnnyDemonic wrote:because tape is inconsistent & you'll never get it to match up to the digital files (tape machine runs slow/fast... even if you have a super tuned tape machine I doubt that you'd get the files to line up)qball wrote:Why not send a squashed mix to tape, then mix that back in with the un-squashed original to taste?
I think women should leave the toilet seat UP!!!
-
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:30 pm
- Location: The US North Coast
- Contact:
Yeah, silly me. I was thinking of a cassette player as being a two-head machine, but of course it's not going to be able to play back a given signal at the same time that it's recording that signal. If you did get some kind of signal back, all you'd be getting is the sound of the electronics, not the tape itself. That or feedback. I suppose you could time out the delay, but that'd take a lot of work and you'd probably still wind up with phasing or timing issues all over the place.
Recall--how'd it work out?
Recall--how'd it work out?
-
- ass engineer
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 12:54 am
- Location: Porvoo, Finland
Hi, it's my first post here, so don't kill me or anything.
This guy I know and played some drums for a while back does all his recording to a newish Fostex 4-track cassette recorder that he has modified slightly in the preamps. And I mean everything, vocals, drums, everything.
From there he goes into Nuendo at 96/24 for the final mix.
Check it out here: www.pepedeluxe.com
This guy I know and played some drums for a while back does all his recording to a newish Fostex 4-track cassette recorder that he has modified slightly in the preamps. And I mean everything, vocals, drums, everything.
From there he goes into Nuendo at 96/24 for the final mix.
Check it out here: www.pepedeluxe.com
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: bluesman and 131 guests