Portastudio vs. "Real" Analog Rigs
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:37 am
- Location: Lawrence, KS
Portastudio vs. "Real" Analog Rigs
Greetings all, this is my first post. I am new to recording and know embarrassingly little, so I thought I would seek your expertise! A couple of years ago, I wanted to experiment with recording, and without doing a lot of research, I bought a Tascam 424mkIII Portastudio because (1) it was inexpensive, and (2) I liked the idea of having an analog rig because I liked a lot of old analog recordings and because I thought that it would be nice to have real, physical knobs, faders, and tape at my fingertips without relying on a computer.
Also, I guess I knew that the Portastudio was an ancient, bare-bones recorder, and I liked the "challenge" of impressing people with amazing recordings that they couldn't believe came from THAT thing! Not sure I've accomplished that yet, but the whole premise assumes that the Portastudio is a mere toy compared to "real" rigs - is this at all accurate?
I'm still not very good, but I've been impressed with some of the recordings that I've captured on the Portastudio, likely because my expectations weren't too high! I've thought about looking into a "real" analog reel to reel rig and wondered whether it would provide any advantages over the Portastudio. For the sake of fairness, let's try to compare apples and apples: Portastudio 4 track vs. Reel to reel 4 track.
(1) Tape: does the tape used in reel to reel 4-tracks differ in any way from the cassette tape used in the Portastudio (width, thickness, etc.)? I think that most reel to reel 4 tracks use 1/4" tape, but not sure what's in a cassette.
(2) Tape speed: is one faster than the other for reduced noise? I run my Portastudio at high speed - 9.5cm/sec or 3.75 inches/second.
(3) Components: are the mic pres and other components of similar quality?
(4) Noise Reduction.
(5) Editing Capabilities: I think that a reel to reel likely wins here because you can splice tape, while I don't think the Portastudio has any editing capabilities other than punching in and re-recording a passage.
Thank you guys for your help. If any of you have achieved good recordings with a Portastudio, please post them to give me something to shoot for and learn from!!!
Also, I guess I knew that the Portastudio was an ancient, bare-bones recorder, and I liked the "challenge" of impressing people with amazing recordings that they couldn't believe came from THAT thing! Not sure I've accomplished that yet, but the whole premise assumes that the Portastudio is a mere toy compared to "real" rigs - is this at all accurate?
I'm still not very good, but I've been impressed with some of the recordings that I've captured on the Portastudio, likely because my expectations weren't too high! I've thought about looking into a "real" analog reel to reel rig and wondered whether it would provide any advantages over the Portastudio. For the sake of fairness, let's try to compare apples and apples: Portastudio 4 track vs. Reel to reel 4 track.
(1) Tape: does the tape used in reel to reel 4-tracks differ in any way from the cassette tape used in the Portastudio (width, thickness, etc.)? I think that most reel to reel 4 tracks use 1/4" tape, but not sure what's in a cassette.
(2) Tape speed: is one faster than the other for reduced noise? I run my Portastudio at high speed - 9.5cm/sec or 3.75 inches/second.
(3) Components: are the mic pres and other components of similar quality?
(4) Noise Reduction.
(5) Editing Capabilities: I think that a reel to reel likely wins here because you can splice tape, while I don't think the Portastudio has any editing capabilities other than punching in and re-recording a passage.
Thank you guys for your help. If any of you have achieved good recordings with a Portastudio, please post them to give me something to shoot for and learn from!!!
Last edited by markesquire on Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
- @?,*???&?
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5804
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 4:36 pm
- Location: Just left on the FM dial
- Contact:
I had a Porta 05 for years. Noisy beast. The dbx noise reduction kept tape noise low, but there is so much system noise with nothing playing it's always a compromise. I'm not sure this kind of noise would be deemed 'charming' by anyone. There was thing cool disc done by a group called Geggy Tah (their first release) that was a hybrid of their low-fi 4-track demos combined with big studio production that had an interesting texture sonically.
If you're striving for clarity, a machine like this might not be your best choice, but if you're striving to learn creative thinking through problem solving (i.e. bouncing, combining tracks, mixing and settling with the best possible input signal with only low and high frequency eq) you should set your self to task and dive in.
A 'real' multi-track tape machine at a 'real' is going to sound way more open with practically no inherent built-in system noise. Much cleaner, way more precise. Everything you'd expect from a larger, more expensive machine.
If you're striving for clarity, a machine like this might not be your best choice, but if you're striving to learn creative thinking through problem solving (i.e. bouncing, combining tracks, mixing and settling with the best possible input signal with only low and high frequency eq) you should set your self to task and dive in.
A 'real' multi-track tape machine at a 'real' is going to sound way more open with practically no inherent built-in system noise. Much cleaner, way more precise. Everything you'd expect from a larger, more expensive machine.
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:37 am
- Location: Lawrence, KS
- ;ivlunsdystf
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:15 am
- Location: The Great Frontier of the Southern Anoka Sand Plain
- Contact:
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:37 am
- Location: Lawrence, KS
Professional reel to reel multitrack recorders move the tape past the recording/playbacks head 5 to 10 times faster than a cassette multitrack. The tape is wider as well. Both of these result in higher fildelity.If "real" tape rigs sound better than a Portastudio, what makes that the case?
"Politics are like sports, where all the teams suck"
- tubetapexfmr
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:39 pm
- Location: Vacuum
I believe you're thinking of the Tascam 388. It would be a great step up from the Porta cassette units. The workflow would be similar so the learning curve would be minimal. The best thing about the 388 is if you wind up getting a computer rig later it folds right in to a hybrid setup perfectly. They are fairly easy to get and there are even two of them on ebay right now.I do recall demoing on some all-in-one Tascam with 1/4" reel to reel; I think it was an 8-track?
Had a mixer built in, though.
http://cgi.ebay.com/TASCAM-388-STUDIO-8 ... 0290153876
http://cgi.ebay.com/Classic-Analog-Tasc ... 0315591366
- timmymacdd
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 4:35 am
- Location: Rochester, MI
- Contact:
Wider tapes makes less noise between the channels so it is better....however tape is expensive. It is a waste of time too. People are more impressed with a good song than a good recording of it.
I love the old 8 track analogue machines they sound great.....Problem comes when the people that you are going to actually be able to listen to your music are going to want it in mp3 format....I didn't see anyone even asking for a cd player this christmas......
I love the old 8 track analogue machines they sound great.....Problem comes when the people that you are going to actually be able to listen to your music are going to want it in mp3 format....I didn't see anyone even asking for a cd player this christmas......
-
- pluggin' in mics
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:14 am
- Location: Holland
- Contact:
Altough you are absolutely right, I would never use that as a reason to abondon tape. A lot of people/mucians a still appreciate the sound and working method of tape as opposed to digital workflow. I don't really care too much about people who listen to mp3 only...(as music loving people only of course, I can understand the benefits of mp3's.)Wider tapes makes less noise between the channels so it is better....however tape is expensive. It is a waste of time too. People are more impressed with a good song than a good recording of it.
I love the old 8 track analogue machines they sound great.....Problem comes when the people that you are going to actually be able to listen to your music are going to want it in mp3 format....I didn't see anyone even asking for a cd player this christmas......
So, get yourself a tape machine! tascam 388 or similar is great...
record hot (stuff)!
http://www.myspace.com/casacassette
http://www.myspace.com/casacassette
-
- ghost haunting audio students
- Posts: 3490
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:11 pm
- Location: Saint Paul, MN
Besides the tape differences (wider, faster), the electronics on "real" decks are quite a bit more substantial. What people mistake for a "tape" sound is really the electronics. Sometimes people will run a signal through the deck just for the inputs and outputs (i.e. no tape). Joel Hamilton (one of the moderators on this board) favors this.markesquire wrote:If "real" tape rigs sound better than a Portastudio, what makes that the case?
That being said, learning how to get the most out of a Portastudio is a worthwhile venture. Many of us older folks started out that way (I started on a PortaOne, graduated to a 238s, and now work with a HD24), and these days I would say the key advantage to learning on a Portastudio is workflow. How to bounce, how to decide whether to keep or toss a track, make decisions on outboard gear with limited aux busses, etc.
IMHO, the people start on DAWs strap every plug-in on every channel, loop aimlessly, and it becomes a compositional and computational mess in a hurry.
Whatever you decide as your next step, don't ever sell off your PortaStudio- it's a gem, and you may even want to go back to it on occasion, if only to remember how to bang out a song in a hurry
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:37 am
- Location: Lawrence, KS
Thanks for the thoughts.
First, exactly what is the width difference between a reel to reel 4 track and a cassette?
Second, what is the speed difference. My cassette tape goes pretty fast because I've set it to "fast" tape speed AND I've maxed the pitch control as well, which runs the tape faster in both recording and playback. Does that even put me in the same speed ballpark?
Would someone mind posting what they consider to be an excellent Portastudio recording?
First, exactly what is the width difference between a reel to reel 4 track and a cassette?
Second, what is the speed difference. My cassette tape goes pretty fast because I've set it to "fast" tape speed AND I've maxed the pitch control as well, which runs the tape faster in both recording and playback. Does that even put me in the same speed ballpark?
Would someone mind posting what they consider to be an excellent Portastudio recording?
-
- dead but not forgotten
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:22 am
- Location: Ramah, New Mexico
+1 on this.kayagum wrote:Whatever you decide as your next step, don't ever sell off your PortaStudio- it's a gem, and you may even want to go back to it on occasion, if only to remember how to bang out a song in a hurrymarkesquire wrote:If "real" tape rigs sound better than a Portastudio, what makes that the case?
The built-in limiter in the portastudio "sounds" so awesome. It sounds "small" but sometimes that's exactly what you need. Keep it around for smashing drums, overheads and guitars at least. And as other's have already commented, they're outstanding tools to learn on, have fun with, use as a scratchpad, and produce demo's with.
"The mushroom states its own position very clearly. It says, "I require the nervous system of a mammal. Do you have one handy?" Terrence McKenna
-
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:01 am
- Location: The Oldest Town in Texas
- Contact:
cassette is 1/8"(actually 0.15 inch, 3.81 mm) and 4 track reels are usually 1/4". That's twice the width of a cassette. Like was already mentioned, real open reel machines run at higher speeds. They also use higher quality heads and run at more stable speeds(often more than one speed choice so the user can choose quality over tape cost or vice versa). I liked my first cheap digital systems better than any of my old 4 tracks, but the 4 track cassette is how I got my start in recording. That and stereo cassette live recordings.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: T-rex and 138 guests