Double-Mic'in'
Double-Mic'in'
Anybody into double-mic'ing a source?
Lately I find myself doing this a lot, with a off-panned room mic with the close-mic'd guitar amp, or a double-mic'd vocal where one is mebbe pass-filtered and limited, the other track more heavily EQ'd and effected ...
It's nothing new of course; it's even trad to D.I. and mic the same stuff (ex., bass) sometimes, or have a close and farther mic (or rear mic, flipped) onna guitar amp, amnd combine them to make a single sound.
I'm just wondering if anyone else is seeing the value in and does mebbe consistently double-mic'ing of untraditional sources like vox ("Heroes" aside) or mebbe guitars for panning and effects purposes.
Me, I find myself using a double-mc'd track as I would a parallel track, but with a inherently different EQ (different mic and placement), or even a natural delay, etc., and I like a little panning (static or moving) in there as spice ...
Lately I find myself doing this a lot, with a off-panned room mic with the close-mic'd guitar amp, or a double-mic'd vocal where one is mebbe pass-filtered and limited, the other track more heavily EQ'd and effected ...
It's nothing new of course; it's even trad to D.I. and mic the same stuff (ex., bass) sometimes, or have a close and farther mic (or rear mic, flipped) onna guitar amp, amnd combine them to make a single sound.
I'm just wondering if anyone else is seeing the value in and does mebbe consistently double-mic'ing of untraditional sources like vox ("Heroes" aside) or mebbe guitars for panning and effects purposes.
Me, I find myself using a double-mc'd track as I would a parallel track, but with a inherently different EQ (different mic and placement), or even a natural delay, etc., and I like a little panning (static or moving) in there as spice ...
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Totally! As an experiment, I once did a record where every overdub used one room mic in the same position, in addition to whatever close mic was on the source. It provided all room-style reverb for the entire session. Ate up a lot of extra tracks though!
For that record (Josh Dion, I think) it was a bi-directional ribbon mic - I even put most of the new sound sources right in the mic's null spot and cranked the gain. The idea was to make the sound of natural room bleed on overdubs to maintain a live feel. Sounded cool as sh*t, I think. You can hear it on my website reel.
I used to try all sorts of multi-micing stuff, but now I do so a little less. I think as your chops, decisiveness and access to great microphones grow, it becomes less and less necessary. I mean, once you have a U67 in the room you don't have to do a lot of crazy sh*t to make it sound good! Just point it in the right place, and work on the instrument, performance, and arrangement.
For that record (Josh Dion, I think) it was a bi-directional ribbon mic - I even put most of the new sound sources right in the mic's null spot and cranked the gain. The idea was to make the sound of natural room bleed on overdubs to maintain a live feel. Sounded cool as sh*t, I think. You can hear it on my website reel.
I used to try all sorts of multi-micing stuff, but now I do so a little less. I think as your chops, decisiveness and access to great microphones grow, it becomes less and less necessary. I mean, once you have a U67 in the room you don't have to do a lot of crazy sh*t to make it sound good! Just point it in the right place, and work on the instrument, performance, and arrangement.
-
- pushin' record
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:31 am
- Location: San Mateo, CA
I'd never done it consistently until recently, but now in my little studio room at home I have a homemade Rat Shack omni electret mic hanging from the ceiling. It's hanging off the top of an angled wall/ceiling absorption panel so it isn't subject to too much in the area of nasty close reflections, theoretically about 50% of the pickup is "infinite" space. I use my console to mix it in with close mics to the same track, though I could track it separately with a flip of the pan/group assignment. I'm mostly tracking guitars, wurli, small percussion and the occasional painful vocal and I'm really liking being able to automatically dial in some kind of room tone/ambiance and just print it with the track. The room is small so keeping the mic in one place has been fine.
I set it up after reading a bunch of Bruce Swedien's GS posts and how he always sends synths through an amp to get room sound (I think it was specifically for first reflections?) around them.
I like the idea of automating a panning ambiance track while the close stays put. Gonna have to try that.
I set it up after reading a bunch of Bruce Swedien's GS posts and how he always sends synths through an amp to get room sound (I think it was specifically for first reflections?) around them.
I like the idea of automating a panning ambiance track while the close stays put. Gonna have to try that.
"Strawberry Fields was a fucking mess, we didn't know what to do with it. Then one day, it just all came together." -Geoff Emerick
http://www.anthonymcaruso.com
http://www.anthonymcaruso.com
-
- gimme a little kick & snare
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:41 pm
- Location: Near the Salty Water
- Contact:
- jgimbel
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:51 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
I've rarely been happy with using two close mics on guitar amps - usually I find it more natural and taking less processing just to use a different mic that has the qualities I'm looking for. However I almost always use a room mic with the close mic on guitar amps, sometimes two, like a far distance one and one in between. The last EP recorded here was a blues album with one gritty guitar on each song, no guitar layering except the occasional solo. The music was very guitar-based though so I wanted it to be pretty full in the mix. I did a close mic down the middle, far mic heavily compressed and hard panned L, middle mic compressed and hard panned R. Sounds like it'd be unbalanced, but with some playing of volumes and put in the context of a mix it's a really nice way to have a bit of "stereo" action with a bit of difference from left to right.
On bass cab I've done two mics, definitely. I've done a LDD with an SDC and that's worked really nice. I always forget just how nice SDCs can be on bass cab, they just don't always pick up that really deep low end, hence the LDD. I've even done the occasional room mic on bass with the close mic. Room mics on vocals every once in a while. Definitely on guitars though, doesn't sound as much like an electric guitar to me without one in there at least a little bit.
On bass cab I've done two mics, definitely. I've done a LDD with an SDC and that's worked really nice. I always forget just how nice SDCs can be on bass cab, they just don't always pick up that really deep low end, hence the LDD. I've even done the occasional room mic on bass with the close mic. Room mics on vocals every once in a while. Definitely on guitars though, doesn't sound as much like an electric guitar to me without one in there at least a little bit.
My first new personal album in four years - pay what you want - http://jessegimbel.bandcamp.com
kinda off topic. but the other day i was tracking a song and for all the drums and electric guitar over dubs i miced up the grand piano in the room and put some heavy books on the sustain pedal. after every drum hit or loud guitar part there would be this crazy harmonious decay from the piano. was wicked.
- SafeandSoundMastering
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:34 am
- Contact:
Very often Ac. Guitars always. Guitar cabs almost always if not triple. (421, 57 or i5 and At4033 distant mic).
It gives you choice and breadth of sound and you can test budget or "odd" mics out by getting a good sound with what you have and then bunging another on to see what happens, great fun.
It gives you choice and breadth of sound and you can test budget or "odd" mics out by getting a good sound with what you have and then bunging another on to see what happens, great fun.
SafeandSound Mastering
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
- LupineSound
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 1:42 pm
- Location: Pawtucket, RI
- Contact:
-
- pushin' record
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:31 am
- Location: San Mateo, CA
The MO is typically to use different microphones, like people mentioning a dynamic (57 or whatever) condenser (414 or whatever) and a ribbon (121 or whatever) all on the same guitar cab, for example. Not only are they different mics with different electrical outputs/sonic characteristics, none of them are in the exact same spot. Even right next to each other, capsules like 1/2" away, they are picking up very different sounds from the source, as the speaker's surface is a constantly varying source as you move around it. So even if you used 3 of the same mic, they are not putting out identical signals. Close but never identical.
So yeah, there's a lot of additive and subtractive stuff going on as they combine, but it's not interactions of a) the same exact electrical signal or b) the same exact sound source, such as if you dup a DAW track and knock it back 100 samples and get that hollow phasey weirdness. Not to say multi-mic'ing can't sound like shit, but done well the sum of the signals offer a "bigger picture" so to speak.
When you start getting into close mic/far mic stuff, it seems to be a bit more susceptible to sounding weird, but again it's just a matter of finding the sweet spot where the cancellations/additions are of benefit to the overall combined sound.
So yeah, there's a lot of additive and subtractive stuff going on as they combine, but it's not interactions of a) the same exact electrical signal or b) the same exact sound source, such as if you dup a DAW track and knock it back 100 samples and get that hollow phasey weirdness. Not to say multi-mic'ing can't sound like shit, but done well the sum of the signals offer a "bigger picture" so to speak.
When you start getting into close mic/far mic stuff, it seems to be a bit more susceptible to sounding weird, but again it's just a matter of finding the sweet spot where the cancellations/additions are of benefit to the overall combined sound.
"Strawberry Fields was a fucking mess, we didn't know what to do with it. Then one day, it just all came together." -Geoff Emerick
http://www.anthonymcaruso.com
http://www.anthonymcaruso.com
- LupineSound
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 1:42 pm
- Location: Pawtucket, RI
- Contact:
-
- pushin' record
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:31 am
- Location: San Mateo, CA
And going back to vvv's original thought about multi-mic-ing vocals, I remember reading something about Bowie vocals (don't remember which).
Vocal close mic as usual, and 3 room mics of increasing distance. Closest room mic is ungated, to give a little ambience. Middle and far room mics are gated, sidechains of each gate being fed by the close mic signal. Thresholds are set in such a way that when he's singing quiet, it's just close mic and closest room mic. As he gets louder, the gate on the second room mic opens up. As he gets louder still, the third room mic opens up. Add in a dynamic singer with good control like Bowie, and you have a very cool effect!
Vocal close mic as usual, and 3 room mics of increasing distance. Closest room mic is ungated, to give a little ambience. Middle and far room mics are gated, sidechains of each gate being fed by the close mic signal. Thresholds are set in such a way that when he's singing quiet, it's just close mic and closest room mic. As he gets louder, the gate on the second room mic opens up. As he gets louder still, the third room mic opens up. Add in a dynamic singer with good control like Bowie, and you have a very cool effect!
"Strawberry Fields was a fucking mess, we didn't know what to do with it. Then one day, it just all came together." -Geoff Emerick
http://www.anthonymcaruso.com
http://www.anthonymcaruso.com
- Sean Sullivan
- moves faders with mind
- Posts: 2555
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:24 pm
- Location: Nashville
- Contact:
I like to stereo mic most acoustic instruments and pan them slightly. Like...2 o'clock and 4 o'clock on the pan pots (or 20 and 40 in a DAW haha!)
This works great with bluegrass, it helps the instruments fills up a lot of empty space. Fiddle can be difficult to stereo mic. Well, easy if you have a STEREO microphone but using two microphones is difficult especially since fiddlers tend to move around a bit.
I don't usually pan a source hard left and hard right unless I want the listener to be "inside" an instrument. Good a B3 leslie...having it swirl around the listeners head.
But, electric sources, I usually find one mic about a foot out from the speaker captures the full range of the amp and I don't have to supplement it. I usually use an Electro-Voice RE20 or an Audio Upgrades AKG C 414 B-ULS.
This works great with bluegrass, it helps the instruments fills up a lot of empty space. Fiddle can be difficult to stereo mic. Well, easy if you have a STEREO microphone but using two microphones is difficult especially since fiddlers tend to move around a bit.
I don't usually pan a source hard left and hard right unless I want the listener to be "inside" an instrument. Good a B3 leslie...having it swirl around the listeners head.
But, electric sources, I usually find one mic about a foot out from the speaker captures the full range of the amp and I don't have to supplement it. I usually use an Electro-Voice RE20 or an Audio Upgrades AKG C 414 B-ULS.
Still waiting for a Luna reunion
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests