MBV Loveless Remasters
MBV Loveless Remasters
So after all these years, My Bloody Valentine's Loveless has been remastered. Most of us never thought this would see the light of day, as rumor had it that this would happen years ago.
It was released as a two disk set, with one disk being a remaster from the 1/2" mixdown, and the other being essentially (from what I've gathered) a normalized version of the original CD (the original CD was mastered from a DAT mix.)
To quote Kevin Shield's Pitchfork interview:
"...the processors in CD players and most digital playback systems operate at their best in the top three dB-- the player acts like all the stuff below that level isn't as important, so it won't process it as heavily.
So, of the two Loveless CDs that are coming out, one of them is exactly the same as the original, but everything's brought up to zero without crushing it with digital limiting."
First off, I think Mr Shields is quite a genius, but I'm not sure if he's got his facts straight on this one. As for the digital information on the CD, there can't be any additional information added, since the full 16 bits were never used in the first place due to the low levels on the DAT, correct? As for CD players, another poster on this forum had mentioned less than optimal performance once the converters hit around -3 dbfs. Anyone care to chime in on this?
In addition, it should be noted that Sony apparently labeled disk 1 as disk 2 (and vice versa.) It's also been said that there is a terrible digital glitch on the 1/2" analog remaster, the only one that really seems deserving of a listen.
I'm pretty bummed out, as I was really curious about this release, but shelling out close to $30 for this is a tough sell.
It was released as a two disk set, with one disk being a remaster from the 1/2" mixdown, and the other being essentially (from what I've gathered) a normalized version of the original CD (the original CD was mastered from a DAT mix.)
To quote Kevin Shield's Pitchfork interview:
"...the processors in CD players and most digital playback systems operate at their best in the top three dB-- the player acts like all the stuff below that level isn't as important, so it won't process it as heavily.
So, of the two Loveless CDs that are coming out, one of them is exactly the same as the original, but everything's brought up to zero without crushing it with digital limiting."
First off, I think Mr Shields is quite a genius, but I'm not sure if he's got his facts straight on this one. As for the digital information on the CD, there can't be any additional information added, since the full 16 bits were never used in the first place due to the low levels on the DAT, correct? As for CD players, another poster on this forum had mentioned less than optimal performance once the converters hit around -3 dbfs. Anyone care to chime in on this?
In addition, it should be noted that Sony apparently labeled disk 1 as disk 2 (and vice versa.) It's also been said that there is a terrible digital glitch on the 1/2" analog remaster, the only one that really seems deserving of a listen.
I'm pretty bummed out, as I was really curious about this release, but shelling out close to $30 for this is a tough sell.
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6671
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
Re: MBV Loveless Remasters
he doesn't. he's talking crazy.btswire wrote:but I'm not sure if he's got his facts straight on this one.
correct. regardless of how many bits were used on the DAT.As for the digital information on the CD, there can't be any additional information added, since the full 16 bits were never used in the first place due to the low levels on the DAT, correct?
probably more like -.3As for CD players, another poster on this forum had mentioned less than optimal performance once the converters hit around -3 dbfs. Anyone care to chime in on this?
annoying....and you wonder how that got past Mr Perfectionist, but that really shouldn't be too hard to fix...i'm looking forward to hearing it.It's also been said that there is a terrible digital glitch on the 1/2" analog remaster, the only one that really seems deserving of a listen.
- frans_13
- takin' a dinner break
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:46 am
- Location: Bavaria, Germany
- Contact:
Duh! I still got the CD they released back then... do you think there really will be a new MBV record soon? Or what's the reissue for if not drumming up some press to prepare for a new CD?
In the meantime you could listen to the Fleeting Joys, maybe the only MBV 'clone' that nailed the sound and took it further.
In the meantime you could listen to the Fleeting Joys, maybe the only MBV 'clone' that nailed the sound and took it further.
-
- steve albini likes it
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 3:46 pm
- Location: Tacoma, WA
- Contact:
I've had a couple beers so I'll admit this: I've always thought the production of Loveless was kinda sucky, thin and lifeless. I'm into the MBV thing and all things shoegaze, but comparing Loveless to, say, Swervedriver's Mescal Head or Catherine Wheel's Chrome, Loveless sounds like frayed paper, to me anyway. Hopefully the remasters add some beef.
- xpulsar
- pushin' record
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 7:55 pm
- Location: Nashville , TN
- Contact:
Agree!Rolsen wrote:I've had a couple beers so I'll admit this: I've always thought the production of Loveless was kinda sucky, thin and lifeless. I'm into the MBV thing and all things shoegaze, but comparing Loveless to, say, Swervedriver's Mescal Head or Catherine Wheel's Chrome, Loveless sounds like frayed paper, to me anyway. Hopefully the remasters add some beef.
Loveless is one of my favorite albums but it is lacking in low frequencies and transients in the lows and transients in general. It is hard to listen to it loud on studio monitors and my AKG K240's which are pretty flat headphones and not hyped in the highs.
-Collin
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Thinking that Loveless is a totally weird, f*d up and frayed-sounding record is not a shocking or novel position, and requires no beers to say in mixed company. I mean, it's clearly a mess from a traditional production standpoint. Some people like that about it though.Rolsen wrote:I've had a couple beers so I'll admit this: I've always thought the production of Loveless was kinda sucky
Loveless is an acquired taste, like liver and onions, or gorgonzola cheese, or more accurately, some type of food that requires massive quantities of pot to learn to enjoy. (Party mix made from Doritos and Skittles; Cold pizza with maple syrup, something like that.)
In any event, it's a seminal record and it deserves our respect, if not our sonic emulation. Definitely not that. It's a record that without fail, makes stereos sound broken.
I'd be curious to hear what the remaster sounds like.
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6671
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
ms. morespace gave me the remaster for my birthday yesterday, only had a chance for a quick listen, but on first inspection i gotta say the 1/2" analog master sounds AMAZING. pick your adjective: warmer, fuller, rounder, deeper.
the severely pushed high mids on the original seem completely absent, which means you can listen to it loud without wanting to die. it really is so much nicer and more engaging to listen to. i was surprised at how different it is.
and amazingly enough it's not limited AT ALL. peaks look entirely untouched. if i could make every record as loud as this one life would be incredible.
the severely pushed high mids on the original seem completely absent, which means you can listen to it loud without wanting to die. it really is so much nicer and more engaging to listen to. i was surprised at how different it is.
and amazingly enough it's not limited AT ALL. peaks look entirely untouched. if i could make every record as loud as this one life would be incredible.
- fossiltooth
- carpal tunnel
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6671
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 11:15 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests