Tracking Vocals Without Headphones
-
- audio school
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh
Tracking Vocals Without Headphones
Hi,
I often record my own vocals, however I despise singing with heaphones on (even with only one ear covered)
I have quite severe tinnitus in my right ear and i find when wearing cans its nigh on impossible to find pitch.
I have heard stories of vocals being tracked in the control room - monitors blaring and nothing but a carefully placed cardoid to minimise/kill bleed.
Do you have any stories/tips/tricks you care to share that may help me find a solution?
Many Thanks
Elliot
I often record my own vocals, however I despise singing with heaphones on (even with only one ear covered)
I have quite severe tinnitus in my right ear and i find when wearing cans its nigh on impossible to find pitch.
I have heard stories of vocals being tracked in the control room - monitors blaring and nothing but a carefully placed cardoid to minimise/kill bleed.
Do you have any stories/tips/tricks you care to share that may help me find a solution?
Many Thanks
Elliot
- Gregg Juke
- cryogenically thawing
- Posts: 3544
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:35 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
- Contact:
Yeah, what vvv said and a microphone with a nice null area. There was a Ronan's Recording Show episode featuring the technique (sorry I don't have a link right now). But look it up.
GJ
GJ
Gregg Juke
Nocturnal Productions Music Group
Drum! Magazine Contributor
http://MightyNoStars.com
"He's about to learn the most important lesson in the music business-- 'Never trust people in the music business.' "
Nocturnal Productions Music Group
Drum! Magazine Contributor
http://MightyNoStars.com
"He's about to learn the most important lesson in the music business-- 'Never trust people in the music business.' "
- A.David.MacKinnon
- ears didn't survive the freeze
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:57 am
- Location: Hamilton ON, Canada
- Contact:
I've done this quite a bit. With active monitors put an in line polarity reverse dodad on the line of one monitor. If you're using passive speakers swap the + & - on one of the monitors. Or find a plug in that allows you to flip the polarity on one side of your master bus. MONITOR IN MONO. This only works if the same info is coming out of both speakers.vvv wrote:I've not tried it, but the theory is that you stand between two monitors, one phase-reversed, so that they cancel out.
Once you've got it set up, put up your mic, hit record and then play a test tone through the speakers. Move the mic around until you find the spot where L & R cancel each other out most.
It never cancels 100% but should put things to reasonable levels. Deadening the area behind and around the mic also helps. You want to keep the sound from splashing off the back wall into the mic.
Another trick is to leave the vocal mic in place and record a track of the bleed. Apply all the same processing to the bleed track that you apply to the lead vocal but reverse the polarity on the bleed track. When mixed at the same level as the vocal it should cancel out another 10 or 20db of the bleed.
-
- audio school
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh
No, it makes it work!
If it was stereo, the two channels, polarity aside, would have different info - stereo information.
In mono they have the same mono info, and thus when one side is inverted and the mic is exactly between, well, in theory they should cancel.
(Thanks to A.David.MacKinnon for pointing that out.)
If it was stereo, the two channels, polarity aside, would have different info - stereo information.
In mono they have the same mono info, and thus when one side is inverted and the mic is exactly between, well, in theory they should cancel.
(Thanks to A.David.MacKinnon for pointing that out.)
If you try the "record a track of the bleed," maintain your singing position in front of the mic while doing so. Your head and body were acting as a meat gobo during the take, you don't want to remove them from the acoustic environment. It also helps to compare flipping speaker polarity to flipping mic polarity, they sometimes give different results.
Village Idiot.
-
- audio school
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5593
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
Re: Tracking Vocals Without Headphones
Aerosmith's "I don't Want to Miss a Thing".ElliottheRussian wrote: I have heard stories of vocals being tracked in the control room - monitors blaring and nothing but a carefully placed cardoid to minimise/kill bleed.
A friend recorded Tyler in the control room with an SM58, monitors blaring. He likes it like that.
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
- Nick Sevilla
- on a wing and a prayer
- Posts: 5593
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:34 pm
- Location: Lake Arrowhead California USA
- Contact:
Kenny Loggins "It's about Time".vvv wrote:I've not tried it, but the theory is that you stand between two monitors, one phase-reversed, so that they cancel out.
I recorded him on this one, using monitors instead of headphones, due to an earache that got very bad if he placed headphones on his head. Excruciatingly painful.
Here is how you do it technically speaking:
You set up a Stereo headphone cue, but send EVERYTHING except his vocals into this mix in MONO. All of it, center right down the middle, even if it is some "stereo" keyboard of whatever.
You will need a good tape measure, and a good sound pressure level meter to set up the speakers and the microphone, and you will need to be able to calibrate the level of the two speakers as close as possible.
For this, you set up the monitors at ear height of the artist, and make SURE they line up facing each other PERFECTLY, and also that they are EXACTLY the SAME distance away from the very CENTER of the microphone center, and that the diafragm of the microphone is EXACTLY perpendicular to the speakers.
Now, use a sine wave oscillator first without the artist present of course, to set the level of each speaker independently. the easy way to do this is to do it controlling the levels from your DAW to the speaker.
In Pro Tools for example, you can create two MONO sends, and keep everything MONO going to two MONO sends, each one feeding a different speaker. Then simply have a master aux fader send (aux channel) with which to control the overall level to the speaker.
Now, once your sine wave is set, try some pink noise as well, to fine tune the levels. Play it back from each speaker independently, and measure right at the center of the set up, i.e. right at the center of the mic diafragm.
Now, once the levels are set, take a "trim" plug in on BOTH sends (in case this introduces latency, which will phuck this up big time), and flip the phase on ONE side.
As you do this, do have the microphone channel on, and you listening to the input of the mic. When you reverse the phase on one channel, it should drop SIGNIFICANTLY. It will not cancel out perfectly, but boy will it turn it down. Enough so that you can actually edit the recorded voice with almost no issues of background noise.
The stuff that does not cancel out are the room reflections of the sound you are pumping in there. But, those are low enough to not be an issue. Unless you are in a tiny bathroom of course. When I did this with Kenny, we were using a giant live room in a professional studio, approximately 2400sq feet, with high ceilings, so the room reflections were so tiny as to be non noticeable. Your results may vary, according to your room size.
Cheers
Howling at the neighbors. Hoping they have more mic cables.
-
- audio school
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh
- JGriffin
- zen recordist
- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:44 pm
- Location: criticizing globally, offending locally
- Contact:
Other singers who have tracked vocals without headphones, using a speaker for reference:
Bono (with an SM58, on "Achtung Baby")
John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Starr (using the "White Elephant" speaker - a speaker set to the side of the vocalist, in the null point of the fig-8 vocal mic)
Bono (with an SM58, on "Achtung Baby")
John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Starr (using the "White Elephant" speaker - a speaker set to the side of the vocalist, in the null point of the fig-8 vocal mic)
"Jeweller, you've failed. Jeweller."
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
"Lots of people are nostalgic for analog. I suspect they're people who never had to work with it." ? Brian Eno
All the DWLB music is at http://dwlb.bandcamp.com/
Iggy apparently does it a lot; the Funhouse sessions famously had him singing with a PA blaring: cite.
I mean, I know that's like way different, but it's such a great story!
" "About 30 percent of the modulation on the vocal track is drum hash," says Inglot [re-master engineer]. "
But on point, "Rhinestone Cowboy".
I mean, I know that's like way different, but it's such a great story!
" "About 30 percent of the modulation on the vocal track is drum hash," says Inglot [re-master engineer]. "
But on point, "Rhinestone Cowboy".
-
- zen recordist
- Posts: 7527
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Bloomington IL
- Contact:
Put the singer toward the back of the room and don't blast the monitors. One speaker out of phase for an entire day of tracking would drive me completely batty. I'd probably feel the need to go throw up. Garges or somebody once said "turn down the overheads, that's the only thing that will bleed and cause problems later." It's sometimes easier with a dynamic, but condensers can be fine.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests