Reamp
Apparently there is some controversy about whether or not he was the first to "invent" it, or simply the first to market such a device.
I don' really know the details though.
Anyway, other than that, I agree with everything else you said above!
I don' really know the details though.
Anyway, other than that, I agree with everything else you said above!
"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."
-
- speech impediment
- Posts: 4270
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Norman, OK
- Contact:
What about this... I've seen bands send their vocals through stomp boxes, what is needed to do this? Do I need to buy a reamp, or can i just get a XLR->1/4" (unbalanced) converter, and then on the way out send it through a direct box? I'd also want to send it to a guitar amp (may be micing/putting effects on harmonicas/melodicas, etc...)
- Ryan Silva
- tinnitus
- Posts: 1229
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:46 pm
- Location: San Francisco
-
- gettin' sounds
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:19 pm
- Glenn Baughman
- audio school
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:52 pm
This one seems pretty interesting.....
http://www.recordingmag.com/resources/r ... /314.html- seems pretty solid in style and substance
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthre ... 79228-some people chatting on a jensen reamp schematic. (a little deeper down the rabbit hole)
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthre ... 79228-some people chatting on a jensen reamp schematic. (a little deeper down the rabbit hole)
What does it SOUND like baby?
-Ray Charles
-Ray Charles
I interned for that dude a long time ago. He was always cool to me. There were some funny stories when Live (the band) came around.T-rex wrote:BTW, the Reamp is the original, I mean that guy invented it and produces it in very small numbers so I totally understand the $200 price tag. I would have loved to have bought one from him just to support small business and because he tracked those Dead kennedys albums; but I had to spend the money elsewhere and the ProRMP fits the bill.
- mixohoytian
- pluggin' in mics
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 4:45 pm
I'm not an engineer, jut a guitarist
but why is a reamp thingy necessary
I always thought the signal would just come out of the computer back into a different amp or whatever..and then re recorded on a different track?
also, with reamping
if Guns n roses chineese democracy is considered a good example, I say re amping guitars sucks...but i think in terms of that GNR album, remaping was code for amp modeling..??
I'm all about tube tone pushing air into a mic
if you re amp into another amp and mic it
can one really predict certain feed back nuances ..I mean if you are getting a vibe from a certain amp and playing off it's feedback, how could you possibly get that same feedback on a different amp without hours and hours of testing
but why is a reamp thingy necessary
I always thought the signal would just come out of the computer back into a different amp or whatever..and then re recorded on a different track?
also, with reamping
if Guns n roses chineese democracy is considered a good example, I say re amping guitars sucks...but i think in terms of that GNR album, remaping was code for amp modeling..??
I'm all about tube tone pushing air into a mic
if you re amp into another amp and mic it
can one really predict certain feed back nuances ..I mean if you are getting a vibe from a certain amp and playing off it's feedback, how could you possibly get that same feedback on a different amp without hours and hours of testing
Part of the thing about re-amping a signal back to another amp is you want (probably) the signal to hit the amp at the same impedance a guitar would so that it sounds like a guitar should through that amp;
The re-amp boxes are said adjust the computer output to do that.
The G&R record is kinda weird, no? Better than I thought, but somehow not good enough.
I do'nt re-amp (guitars, anyway) but I don't think you really do it on feedbacking tracks, for the reason(s) you said.
The re-amp boxes are said adjust the computer output to do that.
The G&R record is kinda weird, no? Better than I thought, but somehow not good enough.
I do'nt re-amp (guitars, anyway) but I don't think you really do it on feedbacking tracks, for the reason(s) you said.
-
- audio school graduate
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 10:47 am
- Location: S.F. Bay Area
- Contact:
roygbiv wrote:Apparently there is some controversy about whether or not he was the first to "invent" it, or simply the first to market such a device.
I don' really know the details though.
Anyway, other than that, I agree with everything else you said above!
For the record: I never said I invented re-amping, only the Reamp.
- ubertar
- ears didn't survive the freeze
- Posts: 3775
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:20 pm
- Location: mid-Atlantic US
- Contact:
Plugging a mic into an xlr to 1/4" impedance matching converter then to a stompbox then an amp will work fine. Reamping is for after you've recorded the track, and you want to send what you've recorded back through an amp to record again.wesimel wrote:What about this... I've seen bands send their vocals through stomp boxes, what is needed to do this? Do I need to buy a reamp, or can i just get a XLR->1/4" (unbalanced) converter, and then on the way out send it through a direct box? I'd also want to send it to a guitar amp (may be micing/putting effects on harmonicas/melodicas, etc...)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests